Suppr超能文献

切口疝修补术。

Repair of incisional hernia.

作者信息

Houck J P, Rypins E B, Sarfeh I J, Juler G L, Shimoda K J

机构信息

Surgical Service, Veterans Administration, Long Beach, California.

出版信息

Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1989 Nov;169(5):397-9.

PMID:2530641
Abstract

Because wound infection is a major cause of incisional hernia, the question posed is whether or not repairs of incisional hernias are at a higher risk for wound infection also. To answer this, we analyzed the incidence of wound infection after repair of incisional hernias during a 30 month period and compared it with the infection rate in all other clean procedures performed during the same period. All repairs of incisional hernias were performed upon patients with completely healed incisions without clinical signs of infection. Patients undergoing concomitant procedures upon the gastrointestinal tract were excluded. During the 30 month period, 995 clean operations were performed. In the 80 repairs of incisional hernias, there were 13 infections proved by culture, yielding an over-all infection rate of 16 per cent. In the remaining 915 clean procedures, there were 14 wound infections (1.5 per cent, p less than 0.0001). Of these 915 clean operations, 241 were repairs of inguinal hernias. Two infections occurred in this subgroup (0.8 per cent, p less than 0.0001, compared with repairs of incisional hernias). In patients undergoing repairs of incisional hernias with previously documented wound infections, 41 per cent had infected repairs. By comparison, only 12 per cent of patients without a prior infection had infections develop in the hernial repair (p less than 0.05). The infection rate for patients not receiving prophylactic antibiotics (21 per cent) was almost twice the rate for those receiving antibiotics (11 per cent), p = 0.07. We concluded that repair of incisional hernias has a significantly higher rate of infection than do other clean general surgical procedures. Herniorrhaphy of a wound that was previously infected is at a higher risk for reinfection, despite complete healing of the skin and absence of clinical signs of infection. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis may be indicated, but randomized studies are needed. For reporting and surveillance purposes, repairs of incisional hernias should not be classified as clean surgical procedures.

摘要

由于伤口感染是切口疝的主要原因,因此提出的问题是切口疝修补术发生伤口感染的风险是否也更高。为了回答这个问题,我们分析了30个月期间切口疝修补术后伤口感染的发生率,并将其与同期进行的所有其他清洁手术的感染率进行了比较。所有切口疝修补术均在切口完全愈合且无感染临床体征的患者身上进行。排除同时进行胃肠道手术的患者。在30个月期间,共进行了995例清洁手术。在80例切口疝修补术中,有13例经培养证实发生感染,总体感染率为16%。在其余915例清洁手术中,有14例伤口感染(1.5%,p<0.0001)。在这915例清洁手术中,有241例是腹股沟疝修补术。该亚组中有2例感染(0.8%,与切口疝修补术相比,p<0.0001)。在先前有伤口感染记录的切口疝修补患者中,41%的修补术发生感染。相比之下,先前无感染的患者中只有12%在疝修补术中发生感染(p<0.05)。未接受预防性抗生素治疗的患者感染率(21%)几乎是接受抗生素治疗患者感染率(11%)的两倍,p = 0.07。我们得出结论,切口疝修补术的感染率明显高于其他清洁普通外科手术。尽管皮肤已完全愈合且无感染临床体征,但先前感染过的伤口进行疝修补术再次感染的风险更高。围手术期可能需要使用抗生素预防,但需要进行随机研究。为了报告和监测目的,切口疝修补术不应归类为清洁手术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验