• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血清与尿液免疫固定电泳的差异。

Differences identified between serum and urine immunofixation electrophoresis.

机构信息

Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.

Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.

出版信息

Clin Chim Acta. 2015 Jan 15;439:68-70. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2014.10.002. Epub 2014 Oct 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.cca.2014.10.002
PMID:25307209
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Different patterns between serum immunofixation electrophoresis (SIFE) and urine immunofixation electrophoresis (UIFE) happen occasionally and laboratorians should understand the mechanisms behind the differences and additional tests required for complicated cases.

METHODS

We investigated a complicated multiple myeloma case that showed inconsistent patterns of SIFE and UIFE. To differentiate monoclonal proteins (M-proteins), the urine sample was treated with dithiothreitol to open up the IgA molecule and urine free light chain assay was used for free light chain analysis.

RESULTS

The patient's SIFE indicated 2 IgA λ and 1 IgM κ M-proteins, while UIFE revealed monoclonal free λ light chains and a suspicious monoclonal IgA κ protein. Subsequent treatment of the urine sample with dithiothreitol and urine free light chain assay demonstrated that the suspicious monoclonal IgA κ protein was actually a monoclonal IgA λ and a free κ light chain that had similar electrophoretic mobility.

CONCLUSIONS

The differences identified between SIFE and UIFE in this case are due to the limitation of immunofixation electrophoresis on different specimen types and intra-molecular disulfide bonds formation in IgA. The laboratorians must be cognizant of the strengths and limitations of the procedure being performed and the ancillary testing techniques available to solve the problem.

摘要

背景

血清免疫固定电泳(SIFE)和尿液免疫固定电泳(UIFE)的结果偶尔会出现不一致的情况,检验人员应了解导致这种差异的机制以及复杂病例所需的额外检测。

方法

我们研究了一例复杂的多发性骨髓瘤病例,其 SIFE 和 UIFE 的结果不一致。为了区分单克隆蛋白(M 蛋白),我们对尿液样本进行了二硫苏糖醇处理以打开 IgA 分子,并使用尿液游离轻链检测进行游离轻链分析。

结果

患者的 SIFE 显示 2 种 IgA λ 和 1 种 IgM κ M 蛋白,而 UIFE 显示单克隆游离 λ 轻链和可疑的单克隆 IgA κ 蛋白。随后对尿液样本进行二硫苏糖醇处理和尿液游离轻链检测表明,可疑的单克隆 IgA κ 蛋白实际上是单克隆 IgA λ 和具有相似电泳迁移率的游离 κ 轻链。

结论

本例中 SIFE 和 UIFE 之间的差异是由于免疫固定电泳在不同标本类型上的局限性以及 IgA 分子内二硫键的形成所致。检验人员必须了解所进行的检测程序的优势和局限性,以及可用的辅助检测技术来解决问题。

相似文献

1
Differences identified between serum and urine immunofixation electrophoresis.血清与尿液免疫固定电泳的差异。
Clin Chim Acta. 2015 Jan 15;439:68-70. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2014.10.002. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
2
Polyclonal free light chain of Ig may interfere with interpretation of monoclonal free light chain κ/λ ratio.免疫球蛋白的多克隆游离轻链可能会干扰单克隆游离轻链κ/λ比值的解读。
Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2010 Fall;40(4):348-53.
3
Development of a highly-sensitive multi-plex assay using monoclonal antibodies for the simultaneous measurement of kappa and lambda immunoglobulin free light chains in serum and urine.开发一种使用单克隆抗体的高灵敏度多重分析检测方法,用于同时测量血清和尿液中的kappa 和 lambda 免疫球蛋白游离轻链。
J Immunol Methods. 2013 May 31;391(1-2):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2013.01.014. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
4
Detection of kappa and lambda light chain monoclonal proteins in human serum: automated immunoassay versus immunofixation electrophoresis.人血清中κ和λ轻链单克隆蛋白的检测:自动免疫分析与免疫固定电泳法
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2006 Feb;13(2):277-80. doi: 10.1128/CVI.13.2.277-280.2006.
5
[Evaluation of the new Hevylite™ IgA assay for the diagnosis and follow-up of monoclonal gammopathies].[新型Hevylite™ IgA检测法在单克隆丙种球蛋白病诊断及随访中的评估]
Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2013 Mar-Apr;71(2):157-63. doi: 10.1684/abc.2013.0805.
6
[Analysis of monoclonal protein in 72 cases of multiple myeloma].72例多发性骨髓瘤患者单克隆蛋白分析
Hunan Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2001 Apr 28;26(2):152-4.
7
Combined light chain immunofixation to detect monoclonal gammopathy: a comparison to standard electrophoresis in serum and urine.联合轻链免疫固定法检测单克隆丙种球蛋白病:与血清和尿液标准电泳法的比较
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2014 Jul;52(7):981-7. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2014-0023.
8
Serum free light chain assay reduces the need for serum and urine immunofixation electrophoresis in the evaluation of monoclonal gammopathy.血清游离轻链检测减少了在单克隆丙种球蛋白病评估中对血清和尿免疫固定电泳的需求。
Ann Clin Biochem. 2009 Sep;46(Pt 5):407-12. doi: 10.1258/acb.2009.009038. Epub 2009 Jul 29.
9
Quantification by Ultrafiltration and Immunofixation Electrophoresis Testing for Monoclonal Serum Free Light Chains.用超滤和免疫固定电泳检测法对单克隆血清游离轻链进行定量分析。
Lab Med. 2020 Nov 2;51(6):592-600. doi: 10.1093/labmed/lmaa012.
10
Comparison of serum immunofixation electrophoresis and free light chain assays in the detection of monoclonal gammopathies.血清免疫固定电泳与游离轻链检测在单克隆丙种球蛋白病检测中的比较。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2010 Aug;10(4):278-80. doi: 10.3816/CLML.2010.n.057.