Bourantas Christos V, Serruys Patrick W, Nakatani Shimpei, Zhang Yao-Jun, Farooq Vasim, Diletti Roberto, Ligthart Jurgen, Sheehy Alexander, van Geuns Robert-Jan M, McClean Dougal, Chevalier Bernard, Windecker Stephan, Koolen Jacques, Ormiston John, Whitbourn Robert, Rapoza Richard, Veldhof Susan, Onuma Yoshinobu, Garcia-Garcia Hector M
Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
EuroIntervention. 2015 Nov;11(7):746-56. doi: 10.4244/EIJY14M10_06.
To evaluate the implications of an Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (Absorb BVS) on the morphology of the superficial plaques.
Forty-six patients who underwent Absorb BVS implantation and 20 patients implanted with bare metal stents (BMS) who had serial optical coherence tomographic examination at baseline and follow-up were included in this analysis. The thin-capped fibroatheromas (TCFA) were identified in the device implantation regions and in the adjacent native coronary segments. Within all regions, circumferential locations of TCFA and calcific tissues were identified, and the neointimal thickness was measured at follow-up. At six to 12-month follow-up, only 8% of the TCFA detected at baseline were still present in the Absorb BVS and 27% in the BMS implantation segment (p=0.231). Sixty percent of the TCFA in native segments did not change their phenotype at follow-up. At short-term follow-up, significant reduction in the lumen area of the BMS was noted, which was higher compared to that reported in the Absorb BVS group (-2.11±1.97 mm2 vs. -1.34±0.99 mm2, p=0.026). In Absorb BVS, neointima tissue continued to develop at midterm follow-up (2.17±0.48 mm2 vs. 1.38±0.52 mm2, p<0.0001) and covered the underlying tissues without compromising the luminal dimensions (5.93±1.49 mm2 vs. 6.14±1.49 mm2, p=0.571) as it was accommodated by the expanded scaffold (8.28±1.74 mm2 vs. 7.67±1.28 mm2, p<0.0001).
Neointimal tissue develops following either Absorb BVS or BMS implantation and shields lipid tissues. The neointimal response in the BMS causes a higher reduction of luminal dimensions compared to the Absorb BVS. Thus, Absorb BVS may have a value in the invasive re-capping of high-risk plaques.
评估Absorb生物可吸收血管支架(Absorb BVS)对浅表斑块形态的影响。
本分析纳入了46例行Absorb BVS植入术的患者以及20例行裸金属支架(BMS)植入术且在基线和随访时接受了系列光学相干断层扫描检查的患者。在器械植入区域及相邻的自身冠状动脉节段中识别出薄帽纤维粥样斑块(TCFA)。在所有区域内,确定TCFA和钙化组织的圆周位置,并在随访时测量新生内膜厚度。在6至12个月的随访中,基线时检测到的TCFA在Absorb BVS中仅8%仍然存在,在BMS植入节段中为27%(p = 0.231)。自身节段中60%的TCFA在随访时未改变其表型。在短期随访中,注意到BMS的管腔面积有显著减小,与Absorb BVS组相比更高(-2.11±1.97mm²对-1.34±0.99mm²,p = 0.026)。在Absorb BVS中,新生内膜组织在中期随访时持续生长(2.17±0.48mm²对1.38±0.52mm²,p<0.0001),并覆盖下层组织而不影响管腔尺寸(5.93±1.49mm²对6.14±1.49mm²,p = 0.571),因为它被扩张的支架容纳(8.28±1.74mm²对7.67±1.28mm²,p<0.0001)。
Absorb BVS或BMS植入后都会形成新生内膜组织并覆盖脂质组织。与Absorb BVS相比,BMS中的新生内膜反应导致管腔尺寸减小更明显。因此,Absorb BVS在高危斑块的侵入性再覆盖方面可能具有价值。