Department of Dermatology, University Hospital-Inselspital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Section of Dermatology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015 Jun;29(6):1107-13. doi: 10.1111/jdv.12758. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
Management of oral lichen planus (OLP) is challenging and therapeutic options are limited. The use of topical tacrolimus has shown promising results. We reviewed our daily life experience with topical tacrolimus in OLP patients.
This retrospective unicentre study included all 21 patients with OLP, which were evaluated over a 53-month period and treated with topical tacrolimus. Patients were initially given a topical preparation of 0.1% tacrolimus twice daily. The response to treatment was assessed using a 4-point scale at month 2 and 6: complete response of affected area (CR), major remission (>50%, MR), partial remission (25-50%, PR) and either no response (<25%) or worsening. The pain score was also assessed using a 3-point scale.
Four of 21 patients (19%) showed a CR at month 2, whereas at month 6, 7 (33%) had a CR. For patients who reported MR (n = 2) and PR (n = 8) at month 2, the therapy was continued. Of those, at 6 months, three patients showed a CR, while four maintained a PR. The pain score improved during treatment. After 2 months of therapy, eight of 10 patients with an initial high pain score achieved a significant improvement. In patients starting with moderate pain an improvement was observed in one of seven patients. Overall, for three patients there was a complete loss of pain, while in nine there was a reduction. Except for transitory burning sensation and altered taste sensation, no relevant side-effects were reported.
This retrospective analysis confirms that topical tacrolimus is a valuable therapeutic option in severe or treatment-resistant OLP. Our findings in daily practice suggested nevertheless that the efficacy of topical tacrolimus is overestimated with regard to both complete response and pain reduction.
口腔扁平苔藓(OLP)的治疗颇具挑战,且治疗选择有限。局部他克莫司的应用已显示出良好的效果。我们回顾了在 OLP 患者中使用局部他克莫司的日常经验。
这项回顾性单中心研究纳入了 21 例 OLP 患者,这些患者在 53 个月的时间里接受了评估,并接受了局部他克莫司治疗。患者最初每天接受两次 0.1%他克莫司的局部制剂。在第 2 个月和第 6 个月,采用 4 分制评估治疗反应:受影响区域的完全缓解(CR)、主要缓解(>50%,MR)、部分缓解(25%-50%,PR),以及无反应(<25%)或恶化。疼痛评分也采用 3 分制进行评估。
21 例患者中有 4 例(19%)在第 2 个月时出现 CR,而在第 6 个月时,有 7 例(33%)出现 CR。对于第 2 个月报告 MR(n=2)和 PR(n=8)的患者,继续进行治疗。其中,在第 6 个月时,有 3 例患者出现 CR,4 例患者维持 PR。治疗期间疼痛评分有所改善。在治疗 2 个月后,10 例初始高疼痛评分患者中有 8 例显著改善。在 7 例中度疼痛患者中,有 1 例疼痛有所改善。总体而言,3 例患者完全缓解疼痛,9 例患者疼痛减轻。除了短暂的烧灼感和味觉改变外,没有报告其他明显的不良反应。
这项回顾性分析证实,局部他克莫司是治疗严重或难治性 OLP 的一种有价值的治疗选择。但我们在日常实践中的发现表明,局部他克莫司在完全缓解和疼痛减轻方面的疗效被高估了。