• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外用环孢素治疗口腔扁平苔藓——21例开放标签、双相、单病例观察系列研究

Topical Cyclosporine in Oral Lichen Planus-A Series of 21 Open-Label, Biphasic, Single-Patient Observations.

作者信息

Monshi Babak, Ellersdorfer Christina, Edelmayer Michael, Dvorak Gabriella, Ganger Clemens, Ulm Christian, Rappersberger Klemens, Vujic Igor

机构信息

Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Klinik Landstraße, Juchgasse 25, 1030 Vienna, Austria.

Clinical Division of Oral Surgery, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Sensengasse 2a, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 22;10(22):5454. doi: 10.3390/jcm10225454.

DOI:10.3390/jcm10225454
PMID:34830736
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8622196/
Abstract

Topical cyclosporine (CSA) has been reported as an alternative treatment in steroid-refractory oral lichen planus (OLP), but evidence is limited and conflicting. An N-of-1 trial setting could be appropriate to evaluate interindividual differences in treatment response. We studied a series of 21 open-label, biphasic single-patient observations. Patients (15 women, 6 men) with OLP recalcitrant to topical steroids received four weeks of CSA mouth rinse (200 mg/twice daily) followed by four weeks of drug withdrawal. Pain (visual analogue scale (VAS) score), disease extent (physicians' global assessment (PGA) score) and quality of life (Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score,) were assessed at baseline (T0), after four weeks of treatment (T1) and after another four weeks without treatment (T2). Median age was 58 years (interquartile range/IQR = 52-67) and median disease duration was 18 months (IQR = 12-44). Median baseline VAS score decreased significantly at T1 ( = 0.0003) and increased at T2 ( = 0.032) (T0 = 5 (IQR = 3-6.5); T1 = 2 (IQR = 0.5-3.4); T2 = 3 (IQR = 2-4.8)). Similarly, median baseline PGA score decreased significantly at T1 ( = 0.001) and increased at T2 ( = 0.007) (T0 = 2 (IQR = 1.3-2.5); T1 = 1 (IQR = 1-2); T2 = 2 (IQR = 1-2)). Median baseline DLQI score also decreased significantly at T1 ( =.027) but did not change at T2 ( = 0.5) (T0 = 2.5 (IQR = 1-5.8); T1 = 1 (IQR = 0-3); T2 = 1 (IQR = 1-4)). CSA responders ( = 16) had significantly higher median baseline VAS scores (5.2 (IQR = 5-6.5)) than nonresponders ( =5) (2 (IQR = 2-3.5) ( = 0.02). In our study, pain, disease extent and quality of life of patients with OLP improved significantly during therapy with low-dose CSA mouth rinse and exacerbated after drug withdrawal. Remarkably, patients with high initial VAS scores seemed to profit most.

摘要

局部用环孢素(CSA)已被报道可作为类固醇难治性口腔扁平苔藓(OLP)的替代治疗方法,但证据有限且相互矛盾。N-of-1试验设置可能适合评估个体间治疗反应的差异。我们研究了一系列21例开放标签、双相单患者观察病例。对局部类固醇治疗无效的OLP患者(15名女性,6名男性)接受了四周的CSA漱口水治疗(200毫克/每日两次),随后停药四周。在基线(T0)、治疗四周后(T1)和停药四周后(T2)评估疼痛(视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分)、疾病范围(医生整体评估(PGA)评分)和生活质量(皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)评分)。中位年龄为58岁(四分位间距/IQR = 52 - 67),中位病程为18个月(IQR = 12 - 44)。中位基线VAS评分在T1时显著降低( = 0.0003),在T2时升高( = 0.032)(T0 = 5(IQR = 3 - 6.5);T1 = 2(IQR = 0.5 - 3.4);T2 = 3(IQR = 2 - 4.8))。同样,中位基线PGA评分在T1时显著降低( = 0.001),在T2时升高( = 0.007)(T0 = 2(IQR = 1.3 - 2.5);T1 = 1(IQR = 1 - 2);T2 = 2(IQR = 1 - 2))。中位基线DLQI评分在T1时也显著降低( =.027),但在T2时未改变( = 0.5)(T0 = 2.5(IQR = 1 - 5.8);T1 = 1(IQR = 0 - 3);T2 = 1(IQR = 1 - 4))。CSA反应者( = 16)的中位基线VAS评分(5.2(IQR = 5 - 6.5))显著高于无反应者( =5)(2(IQR = 2 - 3.5)( = 0.02)。在我们的研究中,OLP患者的疼痛、疾病范围和生活质量在低剂量CSA漱口水治疗期间显著改善,停药后加重。值得注意的是,初始VAS评分高的患者似乎获益最大。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/190e/8622196/51aa530a3397/jcm-10-05454-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/190e/8622196/53088bdfcdf3/jcm-10-05454-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/190e/8622196/bbd76399371d/jcm-10-05454-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/190e/8622196/dddb67c18027/jcm-10-05454-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/190e/8622196/51aa530a3397/jcm-10-05454-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/190e/8622196/53088bdfcdf3/jcm-10-05454-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/190e/8622196/bbd76399371d/jcm-10-05454-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/190e/8622196/dddb67c18027/jcm-10-05454-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/190e/8622196/51aa530a3397/jcm-10-05454-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Topical Cyclosporine in Oral Lichen Planus-A Series of 21 Open-Label, Biphasic, Single-Patient Observations.外用环孢素治疗口腔扁平苔藓——21例开放标签、双相、单病例观察系列研究
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 22;10(22):5454. doi: 10.3390/jcm10225454.
2
Topical calcineurin inhibitors in the treatment of oral lichen planus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.局部钙调磷酸酶抑制剂治疗口腔扁平苔藓:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Dermatol. 2019 Dec;181(6):1166-1176. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17898. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
3
Management of reticular oral lichen planus patients with burning mouth syndrome-like oral symptoms: a pilot study.伴有灼口综合征样口腔症状的网状口腔扁平苔藓患者的管理:一项初步研究。
J Dermatolog Treat. 2018 Sep;29(6):623-629. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2018.1425359. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
4
A Comparative Evaluation of Low-Level Laser and Topical Steroid Therapies for the Treatment of Erosive-Atrophic Lichen Planus.低强度激光与外用类固醇疗法治疗糜烂萎缩型扁平苔藓的比较评估
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2015 Sep 15;3(3):462-6. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2015.072. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
5
A new delivery system of clobetasol-17-propionate (lipid-loaded microspheres 0.025%) compared with a conventional formulation (lipophilic ointment in a hydrophilic phase 0.025%) in topical treatment of atrophic/erosive oral lichen planus. A Phase IV, randomized, observer-blinded, parallel group clinical trial.一种新的丙酸氯倍他索递送系统(0.025%载脂微球)与传统制剂(亲水性基质中含0.025%亲脂性软膏)用于萎缩性/糜烂性口腔扁平苔藓局部治疗的比较。一项IV期、随机、观察者盲法、平行组临床试验。
Br J Dermatol. 2004 May;150(5):984-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.05943.x.
6
Intralesional injection versus mouth rinse of triamcinolone acetonide in oral lichen planus: a randomized controlled study.局部注射与曲安奈德口含漱液治疗口腔扁平苔藓的随机对照研究。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Mar;148(3):443-9. doi: 10.1177/0194599812473237. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
7
Topical therapies for oral lichen planus management and their efficacy: a narrative review.口腔扁平苔藓管理的局部治疗及其疗效:叙述性综述。
Curr Pharm Des. 2012;18(34):5470-80. doi: 10.2174/138161212803307617.
8
A randomized-controlled trial to compare topical cyclosporin with triamcinolone acetonide for the treatment of oral lichen planus.一项比较局部用环孢素与曲安奈德治疗口腔扁平苔藓的随机对照试验。
J Oral Pathol Med. 2007 Mar;36(3):142-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2007.00510.x.
9
Effect of oral care gel on the quality of life for oral lichen planus in patients with chronic HCV infection.口腔护理凝胶对慢性 HCV 感染患者口腔扁平苔藓生活质量的影响。
Virol J. 2011 Jul 12;8:348. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-8-348.
10
Alteration of Streptococcus salivarius in Buccal Mucosa of Oral Lichen Planus and Controlled Clinical Trial in OLP Treatment.口腔扁平苔藓口腔黏膜中唾液链球菌的改变及对口腔扁平苔藓的临床疗效观察。
Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2020 Dec;12(4):1340-1348. doi: 10.1007/s12602-020-09664-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Interventions for treating oral lichen planus: corticosteroid therapies.治疗口腔扁平苔藓的干预措施:皮质类固醇疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 28;2(2):CD001168. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001168.pub3.
2
Topical calcineurin inhibitors in the treatment of oral lichen planus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.局部钙调磷酸酶抑制剂治疗口腔扁平苔藓:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Dermatol. 2019 Dec;181(6):1166-1176. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17898. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
3
A systematic review of the pain scales in adults: Which to use?成人疼痛量表的系统评价:该用哪个?
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Apr;36(4):707-714. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
4
Oral tacrolimus: a treatment option for recalcitrant erosive lichen planus.口服他克莫司:顽固性糜烂性扁平苔藓的一种治疗选择。
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2016 Aug;41(6):684-5. doi: 10.1111/ced.12858. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
5
CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015: explanation and elaboration.报告单病例试验(CENT)的CONSORT扩展版2015:解释与详述。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Aug;76:18-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.05.018. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
6
Efficacy of topical tacrolimus for oral lichen planus: real-life experience in a retrospective cohort of patients with a review of the literature.他克莫司软膏治疗口腔扁平苔藓的疗效:回顾性队列研究中患者的真实世界经验并进行文献复习。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015 Jun;29(6):1107-13. doi: 10.1111/jdv.12758. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
7
Single-patient (n-of-1) trials: a pragmatic clinical decision methodology for patient-centered comparative effectiveness research.单病例(n-of-1)试验:一种以患者为中心的比较有效性研究的实用临床决策方法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;66(8 Suppl):S21-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.04.006.
8
Pimecrolimus vs. tacrolimus for the topical treatment of unresponsive oral erosive lichen planus: a 8 week randomized double-blind controlled study.吡美莫司与他克莫司用于局部治疗难治性口腔糜烂性扁平苔藓:一项为期8周的随机双盲对照研究。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014 Apr;28(4):475-82. doi: 10.1111/jdv.12128. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
9
Oral lichen planus: REU scoring system correlates with pain.口腔扁平苔藓:REU 评分系统与疼痛相关。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012 Jul;114(1):75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2012.02.013. Epub 2012 May 22.
10
Interventions for erosive lichen planus affecting mucosal sites.针对累及黏膜部位的糜烂性扁平苔藓的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15;2012(2):CD008092. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008092.pub2.