艾灸治疗腹泻型肠易激综合征的析因研究。

Factorial study of moxibustion in treatment of diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.

作者信息

Zhao Ji-Meng, Wu Lu-Yi, Liu Hui-Rong, Hu Hong-Yi, Wang Jia-Ying, Huang Ren-Jia, Shi Yin, Tao Shan-Ping, Gao Qiang, Zhou Ci-Li, Qi Li, Ma Xiao-Peng, Wu Huan-Gan

机构信息

Ji-Meng Zhao, Lu-Yi Wu, Hong-Yi Hu, Ren-Jia Huang, Jia-Ying Wang, Li Qi, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Oct 7;20(37):13563-72. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i37.13563.

Abstract

AIM

To identify an appropriate therapeutic regimen for using aconite cake-separated moxibustion to treat diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (D-IBS).

METHODS

A factorial design was employed to examine the two factors of moxibustion frequency and number of cones. The two tested frequencies were three or six moxibustion sessions per week, and the two tested doses were one or two cones per treatment. A total of 166 D-IBS patients were randomly divided into four treatment groups, which included each combination of the examined frequencies and doses. The bilateral Tianshu acupoints (ST25) and the Qihai acupoint (RN6) were selected for aconite cake-separated moxibustion. Each patient received two courses of treatment, and each course had a duration of 2 wk. For each group, the scores on the Birmingham irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptom questionnaire, the IBS Quality of Life scale, the Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), the Hamilton Depression (HAMD) scale, and the Hamilton Anxiety (HAMA) scale were determined before treatment, after the first course of treatment, and after the second course of treatment.

RESULTS

The symptom, quality of life, SDS, SAS, HAMD, and HAMA scores of the patients in all 4 aconite cake-separated moxibustion groups were significantly lower after the first and second courses of treatment than before treatment (P < 0.001 for all). The symptom, quality of life, SDS, SAS, HAMD, and HAMA scores of the patients in all four aconite cake-separated moxibustion groups were significantly lower after the second course of treatment than after the first course of treatment (P < 0.001 for all). Between-group comparisons after the second course of treatment revealed that the symptom scores for group 1 (1 cone, 3 treatments/wk) and group 3 (2 cones, 3 treatments/wk) were significantly lower than that for group 2 (1 cone, 6 treatments/wk) (5.55 ± 5.05 vs 10.45 ± 6.61, P < 0.001; 5.65 ± 4.00 vs 10.45 ± 6.61, P < 0.001). Regarding the two levels of the two examined factors for aconite cake-separated moxibustion, after the first course of treatment, the changes in HAMA scores were significantly different for the two tested moxibustion frequencies (P = 0.011), with greater changes for the "6 treatments/wk" groups than for the "3 treatments/wk" groups; in addition, there were interaction effects between the number of cones and moxibustion frequency (P = 0.028). After the second course of treatment, changes in symptom scores for the 2 tested moxibustion frequencies were significantly different (P = 0.002), with greater changes for the "3 treatments/wk" groups than for the "6 treatments/wk" groups.

CONCLUSION

An aconite cake-separated moxibustion treatment regimen of 3 treatments/wk and 1 cone/treatment appears to produce better therapeutic effects for D-IBS compared with the other tested regimens.

摘要

目的

探寻一种合适的附子饼隔灸治疗腹泻型肠易激综合征(D-IBS)的治疗方案。

方法

采用析因设计来研究艾灸频率和艾炷数量这两个因素。所测试的两种频率为每周3次或6次艾灸,两种测试剂量为每次治疗1炷或2炷。总共166例D-IBS患者被随机分为4个治疗组,每个组包含所测试频率和剂量的每种组合。选取双侧天枢穴(ST25)和气海穴(RN6)进行附子饼隔灸。每位患者接受两个疗程的治疗,每个疗程持续2周。对于每个组,在治疗前、第一个疗程治疗后和第二个疗程治疗后,测定伯明翰肠易激综合征(IBS)症状问卷评分、IBS生活质量量表评分、自评抑郁量表(SDS)评分、自评焦虑量表(SAS)评分、汉密尔顿抑郁(HAMD)量表评分以及汉密尔顿焦虑(HAMA)量表评分。

结果

所有4个附子饼隔灸组患者在第一个疗程和第二个疗程治疗后的症状、生活质量、SDS、SAS、HAMD和HAMA评分均显著低于治疗前(所有P<0.001)。所有4个附子饼隔灸组患者在第二个疗程治疗后的症状、生活质量、SDS、SAS、HAMD和HAMA评分均显著低于第一个疗程治疗后(所有P<0.001)。第二个疗程治疗后的组间比较显示,第1组(1炷,每周3次治疗)和第3组(2炷,每周3次治疗)的症状评分显著低于第2组(1炷,每周6次治疗)(5.55±5.05对10.45±6.61,P<0.001;5.65±4.00对10.45±6.61,P<0.001)。关于附子饼隔灸所测试的两个因素的两个水平,在第一个疗程治疗后,两种测试艾灸频率的HAMA评分变化有显著差异(P = 0.011),“每周6次治疗”组的变化大于 “每周3次治疗” 组;此外,艾炷数量和艾灸频率之间存在交互作用(P = 0.028)。在第二个疗程治疗后,两种测试艾灸频率的症状评分变化有显著差异(P = 0.002),“每周3次治疗” 组的变化大于 “每周次治疗” 组。

结论

与其他测试方案相比,每周3次治疗、每次1炷的附子饼隔灸治疗方案对D-IBS似乎能产生更好的治疗效果。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索