Duncan Alison B, Agnew Philip, Noel Valérie, Michalakis Yannis
MIVEGEC, UMR CNRS-IRD-UM1-UM2 5290, Centre IRD, 911 avenue Agropolis, 34394, Montpellier CEDEX 5, France.
J Anim Ecol. 2015 Mar;84(2):498-508. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12302. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
Co-infections may modify parasite transmission opportunities directly as a consequence of interactions in the within-host environment, but also indirectly through changes in host life history. Furthermore, host and parasite traits are sensitive to the abiotic environment with variable consequences for parasite transmission in co-infections. We investigate how co-infection of the mosquito Aedes aegypti with two microsporidian parasites (Vavraia culicis and Edhazardia aedis) at two levels of larval food availability affects parasite transmission directly, and indirectly through effects on host traits. In a laboratory infection experiment, we compared how co-infection, at low and high larval food availability, affected the probability of infection, within-host growth and the transmission potential of each parasite, compared to single infections. Horizontal transmission was deemed possible for both parasites when infected hosts died harbouring horizontally transmitting spores. Vertical transmission was judged possible for E. aedis when infected females emerged as adults. We also compared the total input number of spores used to seed infections with output number, in single and co-infections for each parasite. The effects of co-infection on parasite fitness were complex, especially for V. culicis. In low larval food conditions, co-infection increased the chances of mosquitoes dying as larvae or pupae, thus increasing opportunities for V. culicis' horizontal transmission. However, co-infection reduced larval longevity and hence time available for V. culicis spore production. Overall, there was a negative net effect of co-infection on V. culicis, whereby the number of spores produced was less than the number used to seed infection. Co-infections also negatively affected horizontal transmission of the more virulent parasite, E. aedis, through reduced longevity of pre-adult hosts. However, its potential transmission suffered less relative to V. culicis. Our results show that co-infection can negatively affect parasite transmission opportunities, both directly as well as indirectly via effects on host life history. We also find that transmission is contingent on the combined effect of the abiotic environment.
共感染可能会由于宿主体内环境中的相互作用而直接改变寄生虫的传播机会,也可能通过宿主生活史的变化而间接改变。此外,宿主和寄生虫的特征对非生物环境敏感,这对共感染中寄生虫的传播会产生不同的影响。我们研究了埃及伊蚊在两种幼虫食物可获得水平下被两种微孢子虫寄生虫(库蚊瓦氏微孢子虫和埃及伊蚊埃氏微孢子虫)共感染如何直接影响寄生虫传播,并通过对宿主特征的影响间接影响寄生虫传播。在一项实验室感染实验中,我们比较了在低幼虫食物可获得水平和高幼虫食物可获得水平下,与单一感染相比,共感染如何影响感染概率、宿主体内生长以及每种寄生虫的传播潜力。当受感染宿主死亡时携带水平传播的孢子,则认为两种寄生虫都可能进行水平传播。当受感染的雌性成虫羽化时,判断埃及伊蚊埃氏微孢子虫可能进行垂直传播。我们还比较了在每种寄生虫的单一感染和共感染中,用于接种感染的孢子总输入数量与输出数量。共感染对寄生虫适应性的影响很复杂,尤其是对库蚊瓦氏微孢子虫。在低幼虫食物条件下,共感染增加了蚊子幼虫或蛹期死亡的几率,从而增加了库蚊瓦氏微孢子虫水平传播的机会。然而,共感染缩短了幼虫寿命,因此减少了库蚊瓦氏微孢子虫产孢的时间。总体而言,共感染对库蚊瓦氏微孢子虫有负面净效应,即产生的孢子数量少于用于接种感染的数量。共感染还通过缩短成虫前期宿主的寿命,对毒性更强寄生虫埃及伊蚊埃氏微孢子虫的水平传播产生负面影响。然而,相对于库蚊瓦氏微孢子虫,其潜在传播受到的影响较小。我们的结果表明,共感染会对寄生虫传播机会产生负面影响,既直接影响,也通过对宿主生活史的影响间接影响。我们还发现,传播取决于非生物环境的综合影响。