Joa K L, Kwon S Y, Choi J W, Hong S E, Kim C H, Jung H Y
Clinical Neurorehabilitation Section, Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine School of Medicine, InHa University, Korea -
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015 Oct;51(5):619-25. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
Few guidelines are available to assist clinicians with assessment of whether a patient is a household or community walker.
To assess the Korean Berg balance scale (K-BBS) and gait velocity cut-off points of a household walker versus a community walker and evaluate which combinations of the three scales (K-BBS, upright motor control test (UMCT), and gait velocity) best assessed walking ability.
Cross-sectional study.
Outpatient.
A total of 124 stroke patients with walking difficulty.
Participants were classified into one of six walking classifications (three household walkers and three community walkers) and K-BBS, UMCT, and gait velocity were evaluated. The optimal cut-off scores for walking classification were determined based on received operator characteristic (ROC) analyses.
The cut-off value of K-BBS for dividing the household walker versus the community walker was 42 points. The cut-off value of gait velocity was 48 m/s for the community walker. The area under the ROC curve of the combined K-BBS and gait velocity values was larger than that of each individual scale and those of the other combined scales.
The results suggest that K-BBS, gait velocity, and UMCT are useful instruments for classifying household ambulation and community ambulation. The authors recommend K-BBS as single scale and K-BBS and gait velocity as combined scales for evaluating community ambulation in stroke patients
In this report, we have some clinical implication. We recommend 3 outcome measures to assess walking ability about home or community; K-BBS (>42 points), gait speed (>48 m/min), UMCT (strong grade in either knee flexion of extension). Suggesting cut-off points of Korean Berg balance scale, gait velocity, and level of upright motor control test for community ambulation could be used as outcome measures to evaluate patient's actual performance level. It is also important to combine several scales for determining walking classification. We suggest to evaluate walking ability by combining K-BBS and UMCT to best predict community ambulation.
几乎没有指南可协助临床医生评估患者是居家步行者还是社区步行者。
评估韩国版伯格平衡量表(K-BBS)以及居家步行者与社区步行者的步态速度分界点,并评估这三个量表(K-BBS、直立运动控制测试(UMCT)和步态速度)的哪些组合能最佳地评估步行能力。
横断面研究。
门诊。
总共124名有步行困难的中风患者。
将参与者分为六种步行分类中的一种(三种居家步行者和三种社区步行者),并评估K-BBS、UMCT和步态速度。基于受试者工作特征(ROC)分析确定步行分类的最佳分界分数。
区分居家步行者与社区步行者的K-BBS分界值为42分。社区步行者的步态速度分界值为48米/秒。K-BBS和步态速度值组合的ROC曲线下面积大于每个单独量表以及其他组合量表的面积。
结果表明,K-BBS、步态速度和UMCT是用于区分居家行走和社区行走的有用工具。作者推荐将K-BBS作为单一量表,将K-BBS和步态速度作为组合量表用于评估中风患者的社区行走能力。
在本报告中,我们有一些临床意义。我们推荐三种结果测量方法来评估家庭或社区中的步行能力;K-BBS(>42分)、步速(>48米/分钟)、UMCT(膝关节屈伸中任意一项为强等级)。提出韩国版伯格平衡量表、步态速度和直立运动控制测试水平用于社区行走的分界点可作为评估患者实际表现水平的结果测量方法。结合多个量表来确定步行分类也很重要。我们建议通过结合K-BBS和UMCT来评估步行能力,以最佳地预测社区行走能力。