• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优化儿童耐万古霉素肠球菌菌血症的治疗

Optimizing therapy for vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteremia in children.

作者信息

Tamma Pranita D, Hsu Alice J

机构信息

aDivision of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine bDepartment of Pharmacy, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2014 Dec;27(6):517-27. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000115.

DOI:10.1097/QCO.0000000000000115
PMID:25313503
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Uncertainties exist regarding the optimal treatment for vancomycin-resistant enterococcal (VRE) bloodstream infections, particularly in settings in which ampicillin cannot be used.

RECENT FINDINGS

Quinupristin-dalfopristin, linezolid, and daptomycin, all approved between 1999 and 2003, represent the mainstays of therapy for VRE bacteremia, although only linezolid has been specifically approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for this indication. The main objective of this review is to compare the relative efficacies, dosing strategies, and side-effect profiles of quinupristin-dalfopristin, linezolid, and daptomycin for VRE bacteremia in the pediatric population. A brief description of recently approved broad-spectrum Gram-positive agents that may have a role in the management of VRE bacteremia in upcoming years is also provided.

SUMMARY

Linezolid, despite its bacteriostatic activity against VRE, may be the most versatile of the available drugs. It has activity against both Enterococcus faecalis and E. faecium, can be administered orally, and resistance appears to be less of a concern with linezolid compared with the other agents. Additionally, the results of two recent meta-analyses demonstrate more favorable outcomes with linezolid compared with daptomycin for the treatment of VRE bacteremia. The clinical pharmacokinetics of linezolid have been well described in children. The most notable concern with linezolid, however, is toxicities associated with prolonged use. Until more prospective data are available, we favor linezolid as first-line therapy for the treatment of VRE bacteremia in children.

摘要

综述目的

对于耐万古霉素肠球菌(VRE)血流感染的最佳治疗方案存在不确定性,尤其是在不能使用氨苄西林的情况下。

最新发现

1999年至2003年间获批的奎奴普丁-达福普汀、利奈唑胺和达托霉素是VRE菌血症治疗的主要药物,不过只有利奈唑胺获得了美国食品药品监督管理局针对该适应症的专门批准。本综述的主要目的是比较奎奴普丁-达福普汀、利奈唑胺和达托霉素在儿童VRE菌血症治疗中的相对疗效、给药策略和副作用情况。还简要介绍了可能在未来几年VRE菌血症管理中发挥作用的近期获批的广谱革兰氏阳性药物。

总结

利奈唑胺尽管对VRE具有抑菌活性,但可能是现有药物中用途最广泛的。它对粪肠球菌和屎肠球菌均有活性,可口服给药,与其他药物相比,利奈唑胺的耐药性似乎不太令人担忧。此外,两项近期的荟萃分析结果表明,与达托霉素相比,利奈唑胺治疗VRE菌血症的疗效更佳。利奈唑胺的临床药代动力学在儿童中已有充分描述。然而,使用利奈唑胺最值得关注的是长期使用相关的毒性。在获得更多前瞻性数据之前,我们倾向于将利奈唑胺作为儿童VRE菌血症治疗的一线药物。

相似文献

1
Optimizing therapy for vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteremia in children.优化儿童耐万古霉素肠球菌菌血症的治疗
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2014 Dec;27(6):517-27. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000115.
2
Treatment options for vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infections.耐万古霉素肠球菌感染的治疗选择。
Drugs. 2002;62(3):425-41. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200262030-00002.
3
Antimicrobial activity of mupirocin, daptomycin, linezolid, quinupristin/dalfopristin and tigecycline against vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) from clinical isolates in Korea (1998 and 2005).韩国临床分离株中莫匹罗星、达托霉素、利奈唑胺、奎奴普丁/达福普汀和替加环素对耐万古霉素肠球菌(VRE)的抗菌活性(1998年和2005年)
J Biochem Mol Biol. 2007 Nov 30;40(6):881-7. doi: 10.5483/bmbrep.2007.40.6.881.
4
Vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteremia pharmacotherapy.耐万古霉素肠球菌菌血症的药物治疗
Ann Pharmacother. 2015 Jan;49(1):69-85. doi: 10.1177/1060028014556879. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
5
Quinupristin-dalfopristin versus linezolid for the treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bacteraemia: efficacy and development of resistance.奎奴普丁-达福普汀与利奈唑胺治疗耐万古霉素屎肠球菌菌血症的疗效及耐药性发展
Scand J Infect Dis. 2010 Jul;42(6-7):491-9. doi: 10.3109/00365541003699623.
6
Daptomycin versus linezolid for the treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteraemia: implications of daptomycin dose.达托霉素与利奈唑胺治疗万古霉素耐药肠球菌菌血症:达托霉素剂量的影响。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016 Oct;22(10):890.e1-890.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.07.018. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
7
Impact of the more-potent antibiotics quinupristin-dalfopristin and linezolid on outcome measure of patients with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus bacteremia.更强效抗生素奎奴普丁-达福普汀和利奈唑胺对耐万古霉素肠球菌血症患者预后指标的影响。
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Jan 1;46(1):30-6. doi: 10.1086/523588.
8
The importance of adjusting for enterococcus species when assessing the burden of vancomycin resistance: a cohort study including over 1000 cases of enterococcal bloodstream infections.评估万古霉素耐药性负担时调整肠球菌种属的重要性:一项包括 1000 多例肠球菌血流感染病例的队列研究。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018 Nov 14;7:133. doi: 10.1186/s13756-018-0419-9. eCollection 2018.
9
Vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteremia: comparison of clinical features and outcome between Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis.耐万古霉素肠球菌血症:粪肠球菌和屎肠球菌临床特征及结局的比较
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2008 Apr;41(2):124-9.
10
Bactericidal activity of daptomycin, vancomycin, teicoplanin and linezolid against Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium using human peak free serum drug concentrations.使用人游离峰血清药物浓度时,达托霉素、万古霉素、替考拉宁和利奈唑胺对金黄色葡萄球菌、粪肠球菌和屎肠球菌的杀菌活性。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2007 Mar;29(3):322-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2006.10.003. Epub 2007 Jan 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Enterococcal bacteremia in febrile neutropenic children and adolescents with underlying malignancies, and clinical impact of vancomycin resistance.中性粒细胞减少伴发热的恶性肿瘤患儿和青少年肠球菌菌血症,以及万古霉素耐药的临床影响。
Infection. 2019 Jun;47(3):417-424. doi: 10.1007/s15010-018-1260-z. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
2
Proper use of antibiotics: situation of linezolid at the intensive care unit of the Tunisian Military Hospital.抗生素的合理使用:突尼斯军事医院重症监护病房的利奈唑胺情况
Pan Afr Med J. 2016 Nov 28;25:196. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2016.25.196.9476. eCollection 2016.