Yanos Philip T, Lucksted Alicia, Drapalski Amy L, Roe David, Lysaker Paul
Psychology Department, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland Medical School.
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2015 Jun;38(2):171-178. doi: 10.1037/prj0000100. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
With growing awareness of the impact of mental illness self-stigma, interest has arisen in the development of interventions to combat it. The present article briefly reviews and compares interventions targeting self-stigma to clarify the similarities and important differences between the interventions.
We conducted a narrative review of published literature on interventions targeting self-stigma.
Six intervention approaches (Healthy Self-Concept, Self-Stigma Reduction Program, Ending Self-Stigma, Narrative Enhancement and Cognitive Therapy, Coming Out Proud, and Anti-Stigma Photo-Voice Intervention) were identified and are discussed, and data is reviewed on format, group-leader backgrounds, languages, number of sessions, primary mechanisms of action, and the current state of data on their efficacy.
We conclude with a discussion of common elements and important distinctions between the interventions and a consideration of which interventions might be best suited to particular populations or settings.
随着人们对精神疾病自我污名化影响的认识不断提高,开发对抗自我污名化的干预措施的兴趣日益浓厚。本文简要回顾并比较了针对自我污名化的干预措施,以阐明这些干预措施之间的异同。
我们对已发表的针对自我污名化干预措施的文献进行了叙述性综述。
确定并讨论了六种干预方法(健康自我概念、自我污名化减少计划、终结自我污名化、叙事增强与认知疗法、自豪地公开、反污名化照片发声干预),并审查了有关形式、小组组长背景、语言、疗程数、主要作用机制以及其疗效数据现状的数据。
我们最后讨论了这些干预措施的共同要素和重要区别,并考虑了哪些干预措施可能最适合特定人群或环境。