Suppr超能文献

超声引导下腰椎神经根周围注射:旁正中矢状面与旁正中矢状斜切面入路的比较研究

Ultrasound-guided Pararadicular Injection in the Lumbar Spine: A Comparative Study of the Paramedian Sagittal and Paramedian Sagittal Oblique Approaches.

作者信息

Kim Young Hoon, Park Hue Jung, Moon Dong Eon

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Pain Pract. 2015 Nov;15(8):693-700. doi: 10.1111/papr.12249. Epub 2014 Oct 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound-guided nerve root blocks and transforaminal injections are well established, and several procedural feasibility studies have been reported. However, the contrast dispersion pattern during ultrasound-guided pararadicular injection has not been reported. We hypothesized that the paramedian sagittal oblique approach provides a superior intraforaminal contrast-spread pattern compared to the paramedian sagittal approach during ultrasound-guided pararadicular injections in the lumbar spine.

METHODS

Ninety injections were performed in 42 adult patients using pararadicular injections. Each injection was allocated to 1 of 2 groups. In the paramedian sagittal approach group, the transducer was positioned perpendicularly over the skin, and a bent needle was inserted using an in-plane technique. In the paramedian sagittal oblique approach group, the needle was advanced with the transducer tilted ~20 to 25° toward the pararadicular aditus plane. In both groups, the needle was advanced until the intertransverse ligament was punctured. Nonionic contrast media was injected under fluoroscopic guidance.

RESULTS

The contrast was injected in the targeted pararadicular compartment in 83 of 90 injections (92.2%). Among the successful pararadicular injections, the intraforaminal contrast pattern was detected in 17 cases (39.5%) in the paramedian sagittal approach group and in 35 cases (87.5%) in the paramedian sagittal oblique approach group (P < 0.001). Both groups showed significant pain reduction compared to the baseline (P < 0.001); however, the visual analog scale for pain showed significantly lower pain in the paramedian sagittal oblique approach group compared to the paramedian sagittal approach group (P = 0.036). Rates of ventral epidural flow, intra- and extraepineural pattern of contrast, and intravascular injections were similar between the two approaches.

CONCLUSION

The paramedian sagittal oblique approach delivered a superior intraforaminal contrast-spread pattern and significantly greater pain relief than the paramedian sagittal approach during ultrasound-guided pararadicular injections in the lumbar spine.

摘要

背景

超声引导下神经根阻滞和经椎间孔注射已得到广泛应用,并且已有多项关于操作可行性的研究报道。然而,超声引导下椎旁注射时造影剂的弥散模式尚未见报道。我们推测,在腰椎超声引导下椎旁注射时,与正中矢状位入路相比,旁正中矢状斜位入路能提供更好的椎间孔内造影剂扩散模式。

方法

对42例成年患者进行了90次椎旁注射。每次注射被分配到2组中的1组。在正中矢状位入路组中,将探头垂直置于皮肤上,采用平面内技术插入弯曲的针。在旁正中矢状斜位入路组中,随着探头向椎旁入口平面倾斜约20至25°推进针。在两组中,针均推进至穿刺横突间韧带。在透视引导下注射非离子型造影剂。

结果

90次注射中有83次(92.2%)将造影剂注射到目标椎旁间隙。在成功的椎旁注射中,正中矢状位入路组17例(39.5%)检测到椎间孔内造影剂模式,旁正中矢状斜位入路组35例(87.5%)检测到(P < 0.001)。与基线相比,两组疼痛均显著减轻(P < 0.001);然而,视觉模拟疼痛评分显示,旁正中矢状斜位入路组的疼痛明显低于正中矢状位入路组(P = 0.036)。两种入路的硬膜外前间隙流动率、神经内和神经外造影剂模式以及血管内注射率相似。

结论

在腰椎超声引导下椎旁注射时,旁正中矢状斜位入路比正中矢状位入路能提供更好的椎间孔内造影剂扩散模式,且疼痛缓解明显更大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验