• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作记忆中的加工水平:额颞叶网络的不同参与情况

Levels of processing in working memory: differential involvement of frontotemporal networks.

作者信息

Rose Nathan S, Craik Fergus I M, Buchsbaum Bradley R

机构信息

University of Wisconsin-Madison.

出版信息

J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Mar;27(3):522-32. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00738. Epub 2014 Oct 14.

DOI:10.1162/jocn_a_00738
PMID:25313657
Abstract

How does the brain maintain to-be-remembered information in working memory (WM), particularly when the focus of attention is drawn to processing other information? Cognitive models of WM propose that when items are displaced from focal attention recall involves retrieval from long-term memory (LTM). In this fMRI study, we tried to clarify the role of LTM in performance on a WM task and the type of representation that is used to maintain an item in WM during rehearsal-filled versus distractor-filled delays. Participants made a deep or shallow levels-of-processing (LOP) decision about a single word at encoding and tried to recall the word after a delay filled with either rehearsal of the word or a distracting math task. Recalling one word after 10 sec of distraction demonstrated behavioral and neural indices of retrieval from LTM (i.e., LOP effects and medial-temporal lobe activity). In contrast, recall after rehearsal activated cortical areas that reflected reporting the word from focal attention. In addition, areas that showed an LOP effect at encoding (e.g., left ventrolateral VLPFC and the anterior temporal lobes [ATLs]) were reactivated at recall, especially when recall followed distraction. Moreover, activity in left VLPFC during encoding, left ATL during the delay, and left hippocampus during retrieval predicted recall success after distraction. Whereas shallow LOP and rehearsal-related areas supported active maintenance of one item in focal attention, the behavioral processes and neural substrates that support LTM supported recall of one item after it was displaced from focal attention.

摘要

大脑如何在工作记忆(WM)中维持待记忆信息,尤其是当注意力焦点被吸引去处理其他信息时?工作记忆的认知模型提出,当项目从焦点注意力中被替换时,回忆涉及从长期记忆(LTM)中检索。在这项功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究中,我们试图阐明长期记忆在工作记忆任务表现中的作用,以及在充满复述与充满干扰物的延迟期间用于在工作记忆中维持一个项目的表征类型。参与者在编码时对单个单词做出深加工或浅加工水平(LOP)的决策,并在经过一段延迟后尝试回忆该单词,延迟期间要么是对该单词的复述,要么是一项干扰性的数学任务。在10秒的干扰后回忆一个单词显示出从长期记忆中检索的行为和神经指标(即加工水平效应和内侧颞叶活动)。相比之下,复述后的回忆激活了反映从焦点注意力中报告该单词的皮质区域。此外,在编码时显示出加工水平效应的区域(例如左腹外侧前额叶皮层[VLPFC]和前颞叶[ATL])在回忆时被重新激活,尤其是当回忆发生在干扰之后。此外,编码期间左VLPFC、延迟期间左ATL和检索期间左海马体的活动预测了干扰后回忆的成功。虽然浅加工水平和与复述相关的区域支持在焦点注意力中对一个项目的主动维持,但支持长期记忆的行为过程和神经基质支持一个项目从焦点注意力中被替换后的回忆。

相似文献

1
Levels of processing in working memory: differential involvement of frontotemporal networks.工作记忆中的加工水平:额颞叶网络的不同参与情况
J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Mar;27(3):522-32. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00738. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
2
Short-term retention of a single word relies on retrieval from long-term memory when both rehearsal and refreshing are disrupted.当复述和刷新都受到干扰时,单个单词的短期记忆依赖于从长期记忆中检索。
Mem Cognit. 2014 Jul;42(5):689-700. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0398-x.
3
Distinct neural correlates of associative working memory and long-term memory encoding in the medial temporal lobe.内侧颞叶中联想工作记忆和长时记忆编码的不同神经关联。
Neuroimage. 2012 Nov 1;63(2):989-97. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.047. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
4
Support for an auto-associative model of spoken cued recall: evidence from fMRI.对口语线索回忆的自动联想模型的支持:来自功能磁共振成像的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2007 Mar 2;45(4):824-35. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.08.013. Epub 2006 Sep 20.
5
Prefrontal working memory activity predicts episodic memory performance: A neuroimaging study.前额叶工作记忆活动预测情景记忆表现:一项神经影像学研究。
Behav Brain Res. 2020 Feb 3;379:112307. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112307. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
6
Are latent working memory items retrieved from long-term memory?潜伏的工作记忆项目是否从长期记忆中检索出来?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Aug;77(8):1703-1726. doi: 10.1177/17470218231217723. Epub 2023 Dec 30.
7
Complex span tasks and hippocampal recruitment during working memory.复杂跨度任务和工作记忆期间的海马体招募。
Neuroimage. 2011 Mar 15;55(2):773-87. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.033. Epub 2010 Dec 21.
8
Differential activation of ventrolateral prefrontal cortex during working memory retrieval.工作记忆提取过程中腹外侧前额叶皮层的差异激活。
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(12):2558-63. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.05.015.
9
Neural substrates of successful working memory and long-term memory formation in a relational spatial memory task.在一项关系性空间记忆任务中成功的工作记忆和长期记忆形成的神经基础。
Cogn Process. 2016 Nov;17(4):377-387. doi: 10.1007/s10339-016-0772-7. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
10
Synchronized brain activity during rehearsal and short-term memory disruption by irrelevant speech is affected by recall mode.排练期间的同步大脑活动以及无关言语对短期记忆的干扰受回忆模式的影响。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2006 Aug;61(2):188-203. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.10.001. Epub 2005 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
The interactive effects of divided attention and semantic elaboration on associative recognition memory: an fMRI study.分散注意力和语义加工对联想识别记忆的交互作用:一项功能磁共振成像研究
Cereb Cortex. 2024 Dec 3;34(12). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhae464.
2
Deep versus Shallow Processing: A Learning and Memory Experiment for Asynchronous and Synchronous Online Platforms.深度加工与浅度加工:一项针对异步和同步在线平台的学习与记忆实验
J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2022 Jun 1;20(2):A146-A149. doi: 10.59390/FEAP4736. eCollection 2022 Winter.
3
Dissociating refreshing and elaboration and their impacts on memory.
分离刷新和详述及其对记忆的影响。
Neuroimage. 2019 Oct 1;199:585-597. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.028. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
4
Aging and Sequential Strategy Interference: A Magnetoencephalography Study in Arithmetic Problem Solving.衰老与序列策略干扰:算术问题解决中的脑磁图研究
Front Aging Neurosci. 2018 Aug 8;10:232. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00232. eCollection 2018.
5
Does Controlling for Temporal Parameters Change the Levels-of-Processing Effect in Working Memory?控制时间参数会改变工作记忆中的加工水平效应吗?
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2016 Mar 31;12(1):2-9. doi: 10.5709/acp-0182-3. eCollection 2016.
6
Semantic and phonological contributions to short-term repetition and long-term cued sentence recall.语义和语音对短期复述及长期线索化句子回忆的作用。
Mem Cognit. 2016 Feb;44(2):307-29. doi: 10.3758/s13421-015-0554-y.
7
From perceptual to lexico-semantic analysis--cortical plasticity enabling new levels of processing.从感知分析到词汇语义分析——实现新处理水平的皮质可塑性。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Nov;36(11):4512-28. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22939. Epub 2015 Aug 25.