University of Zurich and University Priority Program Dynamics of Healthy Aging, Switzerland.
University of Essex, UK.
Neuroimage. 2019 Oct 1;199:585-597. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.028. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
Maintenance of information in working memory (WM) is assumed to rely on refreshing and elaboration, but clear mechanistic descriptions of these cognitive processes are lacking, and it is unclear whether they are simply two labels for the same process. This fMRI study investigated the extent to which refreshing, elaboration, and repeating of items in WM are distinct neural processes with dissociable behavioral outcomes in WM and long-term memory (LTM). Multivariate pattern analyses of fMRI data revealed differentiable neural signatures for these processes, which we also replicated in an independent sample of older adults. In some cases, the degree of neural separation within an individual predicted their memory performance. Elaboration improved LTM, but not WM, and this benefit increased as its neural signature became more distinct from repetition. Refreshing had no impact on LTM, but did improve WM, although the neural discrimination of this process was not predictive of the degree of improvement. These results demonstrate that refreshing and elaboration are separate processes that differently contribute to memory performance.
工作记忆(WM)中的信息维持被认为依赖于刷新和详述,但这些认知过程的明确机制描述却缺乏,而且不清楚它们是否只是同一过程的两个标签。这项 fMRI 研究调查了在 WM 和长期记忆(LTM)中,刷新、详述和重复 WM 中的项目在多大程度上是不同的神经过程,具有可分离的行为结果。fMRI 数据的多元模式分析揭示了这些过程的可区分的神经特征,我们在另一组独立的老年人样本中也复制了这些特征。在某些情况下,个体内部的神经分离程度可以预测他们的记忆表现。详述提高了 LTM,但没有提高 WM,而且随着其神经特征与重复的区别越来越大,这种益处会增加。刷新对 LTM 没有影响,但确实改善了 WM,尽管该过程的神经辨别力并不能预测改善的程度。这些结果表明,刷新和详述是不同的过程,它们以不同的方式对记忆表现做出贡献。