Perrella Sharon L, Hepworth Anna R, Simmer Karen N, Geddes Donna T
*School of Chemistry and Biochemistry †Centre for Neonatal Research and Education, School of Paediatrics and Child Health, the University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015 Feb;60(2):264-71. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000596.
The aim of the present study was to determine whether specific biochemical and energy concentrations influence gastric emptying of unfortified and fortified mother's own milk (MOM) in stable preterm infants, and whether gastric emptying differs between feeds of unfortified MOM and feeds fortified with S-26 or FM 85 human milk fortifier (HMF) when infants are fed the same volume under similar conditions. Influences of infant gestation, age, and weight, and feed characteristics were also explored.
Stomach volumes of 25 paired unfortified and fortified MOM feeds were monitored prefeed and postfeed delivery and at 30-minute intervals thereafter. For each feed, MOM samples were analyzed to determine concentrations of total protein, casein, whey, carbohydrate, lactose, fat, and energy. Fortified feed compositions were calculated by adding fortifier biochemical and energy concentrations to unfortified MOM concentrations. Ultrasound images were used to calculate infant stomach volumes. Statistical comparisons were made of paired stomach volume measurements.
Higher feed concentrations of casein were associated with faster gastric emptying during feed delivery (P = 0.007). When compared with unfortified MOM, S-26 fortified feeds emptied similarly, whereas FM 85 fortified feeds emptied more slowly both during feed delivery and during the postprandial period (P = 0.002, <0.001, respectively). Gastric emptying was slower for 2-hourly feeds compared with that for 3-hourly feeds (P = 0.003) and in supine position compared with that in prone (P = 0.001).
Breast milk composition influences gastric emptying in stable preterm infants, with feeds of higher casein concentration emptying faster during feeding than otherwise equivalent feeds, and FM 85 fortified MOM emptying more slowly than unfortified MOM.
本研究旨在确定特定的生化和能量浓度是否会影响稳定的早产儿未强化和强化的母乳(MOM)的胃排空,以及在相似条件下以相同体积喂养婴儿时,未强化母乳与添加S-26或FM 85母乳强化剂(HMF)的强化母乳之间的胃排空是否存在差异。同时还探讨了婴儿的孕周、年龄和体重以及喂养特性的影响。
对25对未强化和强化的母乳进行胃容量监测,分别在喂奶前、喂奶后以及之后每隔30分钟进行一次监测。对每份母乳样本进行分析以确定总蛋白、酪蛋白、乳清蛋白、碳水化合物、乳糖、脂肪和能量的浓度。通过将强化剂的生化和能量浓度添加到未强化母乳的浓度中来计算强化母乳的成分。使用超声图像计算婴儿的胃容量,并对配对的胃容量测量值进行统计学比较。
较高的酪蛋白喂养浓度与喂奶期间更快的胃排空相关(P = 0.007)。与未强化的母乳相比,添加S-26强化剂的母乳排空情况相似,但添加FM 85强化剂的母乳在喂奶期间和餐后排空都更慢(分别为P = 0.002,<0.001)。与每3小时喂奶一次相比每2小时喂奶一次时胃排空更慢(P = 0.003),与俯卧位相比仰卧位时胃排空更慢(P = 0.001)。
母乳成分会影响稳定早产儿的胃排空,酪蛋白浓度较高的母乳在喂养期间比其他等效母乳排空更快,添加FM 85强化剂后的母乳比未强化母乳排空更慢。