Orozco María Marcela, Miccio Luciano, Enriquez Gustavo Fabián, Iribarren Fabián Eduardo, Gürtler Ricardo Esteban
J Zoo Wildl Med. 2014 Sep;45(3):555-63. doi: 10.1638/2013-0230R1.1.
The transmission of pathogens between domestic dogs and generalist wildlife species may be modified by environmental degradation, biodiversity losses, host densities, and increased contact rates in remnant forest patches. A serologic survey of canine parvovirus (CPV) in rural domestic dogs and wild mammals was conducted in two neighboring rural areas (disturbed and protected) from Pampa del Indio, northeastern Argentina, between 2008 and 2011. A total of 174 domestic dogs and 26 wild mammals-4 crab-eating foxes (Cerdocyon thous), 3 crab-eating raccoons (Procyon cancrivorus), 17 white-eared opossums (Didelphis albiventris), and 2 gray four-eyed opossums (Philander opossum)-were examined for antibodies to CPV using a hemagglutination inhibition assay. Domestic dogs were numerous and their movements unrestricted. The main function of dogs differed significantly between areas, with more dogs used for herding or hunting around the protected area. The seroprevalence of antibodies to CPV in dogs from both areas was very high (93.9-94.6%) and increased steeply with age. Nearly all carnivores and marsupials showed high exposure to CPV. Although a higher exposure to CPV was expected in wild mammals from disturbed areas as a result of enhanced contact between dogs and wildlife, no significant differences were found between areas. To the authors' knowledge, this study is the first to document exposure to CPV of free-ranging Pr. cancrivorus, D. albiventris, and Ph. opossum, and include a detailed demographic study of the domestic dog populations living in the area. This study highlights that dogs and wildlife have potential opportunities for contact and shows that the edges of the protected area may be as suitable as other fragmented areas for the transmission of CPV. Rural domestic dogs may pose serious threats to the health and conservation of wild carnivores in both disturbed and protected areas, especially in the Gran Chaco, where habitat fragmentation is severely increasing.
家犬与普通野生动物物种之间病原体的传播可能会因环境退化、生物多样性丧失、宿主密度以及残留森林斑块中接触率的增加而发生改变。2008年至2011年期间,在阿根廷东北部潘帕德尔印第奥的两个相邻农村地区(受干扰地区和保护区)对农村家犬和野生哺乳动物进行了犬细小病毒(CPV)的血清学调查。总共对174只家犬和26只野生哺乳动物——4只食蟹狐(Cerdocyon thous)、3只食蟹浣熊(Procyon cancrivorus)、17只白耳负鼠(Didelphis albiventris)和2只灰四眼负鼠(Philander opossum)——使用血凝抑制试验检测了CPV抗体。家犬数量众多且活动不受限制。两个地区家犬的主要功能差异显著,在保护区周围用于放牧或狩猎的家犬更多。两个地区家犬中CPV抗体的血清阳性率都非常高(93.9 - 94.6%),并且随年龄急剧上升。几乎所有的食肉动物和有袋动物都显示出对CPV的高暴露率。尽管由于家犬与野生动物之间接触增加,预计受干扰地区的野生哺乳动物对CPV的暴露率会更高,但两个地区之间未发现显著差异。据作者所知, 本研究首次记录了野生食蟹浣熊、白耳负鼠和灰四眼负鼠接触CPV的情况,并对该地区家犬种群进行了详细的种群统计学研究。这项研究强调了家犬和野生动物有潜在的接触机会,并表明保护区的边缘可能与其他破碎化地区一样适合CPV的传播。农村家犬可能对受干扰地区和保护区的野生食肉动物的健康和保护构成严重威胁,尤其是在大查科地区,那里栖息地破碎化正在严重加剧。