Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Butler University, 4600 Sunset Ave., Indianapolis, IN, 46208, USA,
Paediatr Drugs. 2014 Dec;16(6):523-9. doi: 10.1007/s40272-014-0093-1.
Extended-interval aminoglycoside (EIAG) and extended- and continuous-infusion β-lactam (EIBL and CIBL) dosing strategies are increasingly used in adults, but pediatric literature is limited.
The objective of this study was to describe the use of EIAG, EIBL, and CIBL dosing in pediatric hospitals in the USA.
STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A national survey of children's hospitals was conducted. A single practitioner from each target hospital was identified through the Children's Hospital Association. Practice-based survey questions identified whether hospitals utilize EIAG, EIBL, and CIBL dosing.
The main outcome measure was the percentage utilization of the dosing strategies, with secondary outcomes being the reasons for not using these dosing strategies.
Seventy-seven of 215 identified practitioners (36 %) participated in the survey. EIAG, EIBL, and CIBL dosing were utilized in 63 %, 24 %, and 13 % of responding hospitals, respectively. The most common reasons for not using EIAG were concern regarding lack of efficacy data (56 %) and concern regarding the duration of the drug-free period (41 %). Respondents who did not utilize EIBL cited concern due to lack of pediatric EIBL efficacy data (54 %), the need for more intravenous access (54 %), intravenous medication compatibility issues (39 %), and the time during which the patient is attached to an intravenous infusion (31 %).
This survey of children's hospitals indicates that EIAG is used in over 50 % of hospitals, but there is some lag in adoption of EIBL and CIBL dosing, both of which are used in fewer than 25 % of hospitals. Additional studies may provide much-needed evidence to increase the utilization of these strategies.
在成人中,越来越多地使用延长间隔氨基糖苷类(EIAG)和延长及持续输注β-内酰胺类(EIBL 和 CIBL)给药策略,但儿科文献有限。
本研究旨在描述美国儿科医院中 EIAG、EIBL 和 CIBL 给药的使用情况。
研究设计、地点和参与者:对儿童医院进行了全国性调查。通过儿童医院协会,从每个目标医院确定一名单一的从业者。基于实践的调查问题确定了医院是否使用 EIAG、EIBL 和 CIBL 给药。
主要观察指标是给药策略的使用率,次要观察指标是不使用这些给药策略的原因。
在确定的 215 名从业者中,有 77 名(36%)参与了调查。分别有 63%、24%和 13%的医院使用 EIAG、EIBL 和 CIBL 给药。不使用 EIAG 的最常见原因是担心缺乏疗效数据(56%)和担心无药期持续时间(41%)。不使用 EIBL 的受访者提到了缺乏儿科 EIBL 疗效数据(54%)、需要更多静脉通路(54%)、静脉药物相容性问题(39%)以及患者附着在静脉输注上的时间(31%)等原因。
这项对儿童医院的调查表明,EIAG 在超过 50%的医院中使用,但 EIBL 和 CIBL 给药的采用率较低,这两种方法在不到 25%的医院中使用。进一步的研究可能会提供急需的证据,以增加这些策略的应用。