Al-Moraissi Essam Ahmed, Ellis Edward
PhD Student, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt; Lecturer, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Thamar University, Thamar, Yemen.
Professor and Chair, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Dec;72(12):2507.e1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.07.042. Epub 2014 Aug 2.
The aims of this study were to 1) determine which fixation method has the fewest complications in the treatment of anterior mandibular fractures (AMFs) and 2) provide scientific data to enable surgeons to make evidence-based decisions regarding the best technique.
A comprehensive electronic search without date and language restrictions was performed in March 2014. Studies in humans, including randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, and retrospective studies, were included with the aim of comparing fixation techniques (lag screws, 3-dimensional plates, 1 plate, and 2 miniplates) in the management of AMFs. The incidence of postoperative complications was evaluated.
Thirteen publications were included: 8 randomized controlled trials, 3 controlled clinical trials, and 2 retrospective studies. Seven studies showed a low risk for bias, 3 studies showed a moderate risk for bias, and 3 studies showed a high risk for bias. There were statistically significant advantages for lag screws and 1 plate plus an arch bar. There was no statistically significant difference between 3-dimensional plates and 2 miniplates. The cumulative odds ratio was 0.29, meaning that the use of lag screws in the fixation of AMFs decreases the risk for postoperative complications by 71% over the use of 2 miniplates. The cumulative odds ratio for 1 plate plus an arch bar was 0.28, showing that the use of 1 plate plus an arch bar in the fixation of AMFs decreases the risk for postoperative complications by 72% over the use of 2 plates.
The results of this meta-analysis revealed that the use of both lag screws and 1 plate plus an arch bar were superior to 2 miniplates in reducing the incidence of postoperative complications in the management of AMFs. Also, there were significantly shorter operating times with lag screws and 3-dimensional miniplates over 2 miniplates in the fixation of AMFs.
本研究的目的是:1)确定在下颌骨前部骨折(AMF)治疗中哪种固定方法并发症最少;2)提供科学数据,使外科医生能够就是否采用最佳技术做出循证决策。
2014年3月进行了一项无日期和语言限制的全面电子检索。纳入了针对人类的研究,包括随机或半随机对照试验、对照临床试验和回顾性研究,目的是比较下颌骨前部骨折治疗中不同固定技术(拉力螺钉、三维钢板、一块钢板和两块微型钢板)。评估术后并发症的发生率。
纳入了13篇文献:8篇随机对照试验、3篇对照临床试验和2篇回顾性研究。7项研究显示偏倚风险较低,3项研究显示偏倚风险中等,3项研究显示偏倚风险较高。拉力螺钉和一块钢板加牙弓夹板具有统计学上的显著优势。三维钢板和两块微型钢板之间无统计学显著差异。累积比值比为0.29,这意味着在固定下颌骨前部骨折时,使用拉力螺钉比使用两块微型钢板可使术后并发症风险降低71%。一块钢板加牙弓夹板的累积比值比为0.28,表明在固定下颌骨前部骨折时,使用一块钢板加牙弓夹板比使用两块微型钢板可使术后并发症风险降低72%。
本荟萃分析结果显示,在降低下颌骨前部骨折治疗术后并发症发生率方面,使用拉力螺钉和一块钢板加牙弓夹板均优于两块微型钢板。此外,在固定下颌骨前部骨折时,使用拉力螺钉和三维微型钢板的手术时间明显短于使用两块微型钢板。