Suppr超能文献

紧急救护车出诊通常提供初级护理。

[Emergency ambulance call-outs often provide primary care].

作者信息

Smits Marleen, Francissen Oscar, Weerts Marleen, Janssen Karlijn, van Grunsven Pierre, Giesen Paul

机构信息

Radboudumc, afd. Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Nijmegen.

出版信息

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2014;158:A7863.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine patient and care characteristics of emergency ambulance call-outs and to determine how many of them were, in retrospect, effectively providing primary care.

DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

METHOD

We charted patient and care characteristics of 598 emergency ambulance call-outs in the Zuid-Gelderland region in the east of the Netherlands by applying a retrospective dossier analysis method. Three reviewers independently retrospectively determined what the required care was: primary or secondary care. This judgment was compared with the actual care given to the patient: treatment-on-the-spot or transfer to hospital.

RESULTS

A1 care was provided in 74.1% and A2 care in 25.9% of the ambulance call-outs. Mean patient age was 49.2 years and 53.3% of the patients were male. The probability diagnoses 'becoming unwell' (11.5%) and 'trauma to extremity' (11.2%) were the most common. In retrospect, the patient could have been treated in primary care, or self-treated, in 42.3% of the ambulance call-outs. The percentage of primary care was higher during office hours than out of hours (49 vs 39). In 91.7% of cases the required care as determined by the reviewers was the same as the actual follow-up care given to the patient by paramedics.

CONCLUSION

Almost half of emergency ambulance call-outs effectively provide primary care. This finding reinforces the need for research into cooperation between ambulance services, primary care practices and out-of-hours primary care cooperatives.

摘要

目的

研究紧急救护车出诊的患者及护理特征,并确定其中有多少在回顾时实际上提供了初级护理。

设计

回顾性横断面研究。

方法

我们通过应用回顾性档案分析方法,梳理了荷兰东部南格尔德兰地区598次紧急救护车出诊的患者及护理特征。三名评审员独立回顾性确定所需护理级别:初级护理或二级护理。将这一判断结果与给予患者的实际护理情况进行比较:现场治疗或转送至医院。

结果

74.1%的救护车出诊提供了A1级护理,25.9%提供了A2级护理。患者平均年龄为49.2岁,53.3%的患者为男性。最常见的可能诊断为“身体不适”(11.5%)和“肢体创伤”(11.2%)。回顾来看,42.3%的救护车出诊患者本可在初级护理机构接受治疗或自我治疗。办公时间内初级护理的比例高于非办公时间(49%对39%)。在91.7%的病例中,评审员确定的所需护理与护理人员给予患者的实际后续护理一致。

结论

几乎一半的紧急救护车出诊有效地提供了初级护理。这一发现强化了对救护车服务、初级护理机构和非办公时间初级护理合作社之间合作进行研究的必要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验