• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与机器人骶骨阴道固定术的姿势人体工程学比较:一项初步研究。

Comparison of postural ergonomics between laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy: a pilot study.

作者信息

Tarr Megan E, Brancato Sam J, Cunkelman Jacqueline A, Polcari Anthony, Nutter Benjamin, Kenton Kimberly

机构信息

Division of Female Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Departments of Obstetrics/Gynecology and Urology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio; Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.

Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.

出版信息

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Feb;22(2):234-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.10.004. Epub 2014 Oct 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2014.10.004
PMID:25315401
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare resident, fellow, and attending urologic and gynecologic surgeons' musculoskeletal and mental strain during laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).

SETTING

Academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Patients who underwent robotic or laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy from October 2009 to January 2011.

INTERVENTIONS

The Body Part Discomfort (BPD) survey was completed before cases, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index and BPD survey were completed after cases. Higher scores on BPD and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index indicate greater musculoskeletal discomfort and mental strain. BPD scores were averaged over the following body regions: head/neck, back, hand/wrist, arms, and knees/ankles/feet. Changes in body region-specific discomfort scores were the primary outcomes.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Multivariable analysis was performed using mixed-effects linear regression with surgeon as a random effect. Sixteen surgeons participated (53% fellows, 34% residents, and 13% attendings). Thirty-three robotic and 53 laparoscopic cases were analyzed, with a median surgical time of 231 minutes (interquartile range, 204-293 minutes) versus 227 minutes (interquartile range, 203-272 minutes; p = .31), a median estimated blood loss of 100 mL (interquartile range, 50-175 mL) versus 150 mL (interquartile range, 50-200 mL; p = .22), and a mean patient body mass index of 27 ± 4 versus 26 ± 4 kg/m(2) (p = .26), respectively. Robotic surgeries were associated with lower neck/shoulder (-0.19 [interquartile range, -0.32 to -0.01], T = -2.49) and back discomfort scores (-0.35 [interquartile range, -0.58 to 0], T = -2.38) than laparoscopic surgeries. Knee/ankle/foot and arm discomfort increased with case length (0.18 [interquartile range, 0.02-0.3], T = 2.81) and (0.07 [interquartile range, 0.01-0.14], p = .03), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Surgeons performing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy experienced less neck, shoulder, and back discomfort when surgery was performed robotically.

摘要

研究目的

比较住院医师、专科住院医师以及泌尿外科和妇科主治医师在腹腔镜和机器人辅助骶骨阴道固定术中的肌肉骨骼及精神紧张程度。

设计

前瞻性队列研究(加拿大工作组分类II-2)。

地点

学术医疗中心。

患者

2009年10月至2011年1月期间接受机器人辅助或腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术的患者。

干预措施

术前完成身体部位不适(BPD)调查,术后完成美国国家航空航天局任务负荷指数和BPD调查。BPD和美国国家航空航天局任务负荷指数得分越高表明肌肉骨骼不适和精神紧张程度越高。BPD得分按以下身体部位进行平均:头/颈、背部、手/腕、手臂以及膝/踝/足。特定身体部位不适得分的变化为主要结局。

测量指标及主要结果

采用以外科医生为随机效应的混合效应线性回归进行多变量分析。16名外科医生参与研究(53%为专科住院医师,34%为住院医师,13%为主治医师)。分析了33例机器人辅助手术和53例腹腔镜手术,中位手术时间分别为231分钟(四分位间距,204 - 293分钟)和227分钟(四分位间距,203 - 272分钟;p = 0.31),中位估计失血量分别为100 mL(四分位间距,50 - 175 mL)和150 mL(四分位间距,50 - 200 mL;p = 0.22),患者平均体重指数分别为27±4和26±4 kg/m²(p = 0.26)。与腹腔镜手术相比,机器人辅助手术患者的颈部/肩部(-0.19[四分位间距,-0.32至-0.01],T = -2.49)和背部不适得分更低(-0.35[四分位间距,-0.58至0],T = -2.38)。膝/踝/足和手臂不适分别随手术时长增加(0.18[四分位间距,0.02 - 0.3],T = 2.81)和(0.07[四分位间距,0.01 - 0.14],p = 0.03)。

结论

进行微创骶骨阴道固定术时,机器人辅助手术的外科医生颈部、肩部和背部不适程度较低。

相似文献

1
Comparison of postural ergonomics between laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy: a pilot study.腹腔镜与机器人骶骨阴道固定术的姿势人体工程学比较:一项初步研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Feb;22(2):234-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.10.004. Epub 2014 Oct 12.
2
Effect of chair types on work-related musculoskeletal discomfort during vaginal surgery.椅子类型对阴道手术期间与工作相关的肌肉骨骼不适的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;215(5):648.e1-648.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.016. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
3
Robotic Assistance Confers Ambidexterity to Laparoscopic Surgeons.机器人辅助赋予腹腔镜医师双手操作能力。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Jan;25(1):76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.07.010. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
4
Bariatric Surgeon Ergonomics: A Comparison of Laparoscopy and Robotics.减重外科医生工效学:腹腔镜与机器人的比较。
J Surg Res. 2024 Mar;295:864-873. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.08.045. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
5
Ergonomic Robotic Console Configuration in Gynecologic Surgery: An Interventional Study.妇科手术中的人机工程学机器人控制台配置:一项干预性研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Apr;28(4):850-859. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.07.017. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
6
Cosmetic Appearance of Port-site Scars 1 Year After Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: A Supplementary Study of the ACCESS Clinical Trial.腹腔镜与机器人骶骨阴道固定术后1年腹部穿刺孔瘢痕的外观:ACCESS临床试验的补充研究
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Sep-Oct;23(6):917-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.05.001. Epub 2016 May 12.
7
A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic ergonomic risk.腹腔镜与机器人手术的人机工程学风险比较。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Nov;36(11):8397-8402. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09105-0. Epub 2022 Feb 19.
8
Intraoperative musculoskeletal discomfort and risk for surgeons during open and laparoscopic surgery.术中肌肉骨骼不适和开放与腹腔镜手术中外科医生的风险。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Nov;35(11):6335-6343. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08085-3. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
9
Postural ergonomics during robotic and laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: a pilot project.机器人辅助和腹腔镜胃旁路手术中的姿势人体工程学:一个试点项目。
J Robot Surg. 2007;1(1):61-7. doi: 10.1007/s11701-007-0016-z. Epub 2007 Feb 10.
10
Intraoperative workload in robotic surgery assessed by wearable motion tracking sensors and questionnaires.通过可穿戴运动跟踪传感器和问卷调查评估机器人手术中的术中工作量。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Feb;31(2):877-886. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5047-y. Epub 2016 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the ergonomic aspects of laparoscopic energy devices: combination of a survey and a kinesiologic experiment.评估腹腔镜能量设备的人体工程学方面:一项调查与一项运动学实验的结合
Surg Endosc. 2025 Sep 9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12082-9.
2
Feasibility and Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy Using Autologous Round Ligament Grafts: A Novel Non-Mesh Surgical Approach for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.使用自体圆韧带移植物的机器人辅助骶骨阴道固定术的可行性和临床结果:一种用于盆腔器官脱垂的新型无网片手术方法
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jul 9;61(7):1242. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071242.
3
Advancing Ergonomics in Minimally Invasive Bariatric Surgery: a Proposed Unified Ergonomic Checklist for Minimally Invasive Surgeries in Obesity (UEC-MISO).
推进微创减肥手术中的人体工程学:肥胖症微创手术人体工程学统一检查表(UEC-MISO)提案
Obes Surg. 2025 Jul 17. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-08084-0.
4
Optimising ergonomics in minimally invasive gynaecological surgery: a comprehensive review and practice recommendations.优化微创妇科手术中的人体工程学:全面综述与实践建议。
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2025 Jun 27;17(2):180-191. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.2025.12. Epub 2025 Jun 24.
5
The Safety of Robot-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Treatment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.机器人辅助骶骨阴道固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的安全性:系统评价与荟萃分析
Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Jul;36(7):1355-1372. doi: 10.1007/s00192-025-06158-2. Epub 2025 Jun 12.
6
A systematic review of ergonomic and muscular strain in surgeons comparing robotic to laparoscopic approaches.一项关于外科医生中人体工程学和肌肉劳损的系统评价,比较机器人手术与腹腔镜手术方法。
J Robot Surg. 2025 May 31;19(1):252. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02401-6.
7
Very long-term outcomes of robotic mesh sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse repair.机器人网状物骶骨阴道固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂修复的极长期结果。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Dec 13;19(1):25. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02185-1.
8
The evidence behind robot-assisted abdominopelvic surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.机器人辅助腹盆腔手术的证据:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 May;38(5):2371-2382. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10773-3. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
9
The rise of robotic colorectal surgery: better for patients and better for surgeons.机器人结直肠手术的兴起:对患者和外科医生都更好。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Feb 8;18(1):69. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01822-z.
10
Impact of preferred surgical modality on surgeon wellness: a survey of workload, physical pain/discomfort, and neuromusculoskeletal disorders.手术方式偏好对外科医生健康的影响:一项关于工作量、身体疼痛/不适和神经肌肉骨骼疾病的调查。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Dec;37(12):9244-9254. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10485-0. Epub 2023 Oct 23.