Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 16, Jichang Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, 510405, Guangdong Province, China.
The First Clinical School, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510405, China.
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 13;11(1):20333. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99716-9.
Levosimendan and dobutamine are extensively used to treat sepsis-associated cardiovascular failure in ICU. Nevertheless, the role and mechanism of levosimendan in patients with sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy remains unclear. Moreover, previous studies on whether levosimendan is superior to dobutamine are still controversial. More importantly, these studies did not take changes (before-after comparison to the baseline) in quantitative parameters such as ejection fraction into account with the baseline level. Here, we aimed to determine the pros and cons of the two medicines by assessing the changes in cardiac function and blood lactate, mortality, with the standardized mean difference used as a summary statistic. Relevant studies were obtained by a thorough and disciplined literature search in several notable academic databases, including Google Scholar, PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase until November 2020. Outcomes included changes in cardiac function, lactic acid, mortality and length of hospital stay. A total of 6 randomized controlled trials were included in this study, including 192 patients. Compared with dobutamine, patients treated with levosimendan had a greater improvement of cardiac index (ΔCI) (random effects, SMD = 0.90 [0.20,1.60]; I = 76%, P < 0.01) and left ventricular stroke work index (ΔLVSWI) (random effects, SMD = 1.56 [0.90,2.21]; I = 65%, P = 0.04), a significant decrease of blood lactate (Δblood lactate) (random effects, MD = - 0.79 [- 1.33, - 0.25]; I = 68%, P < 0.01) at 24-h after drug intervention, respectively. There was no significant difference between levosimendan and dobutamine on all-cause mortality in ICU (fixed effect, OR = 0.72 [0.39,1.33]; I = 0%, P = 0.99). We combine effect sizes related to different measurement parameters to evaluate cardiac function, which implied that septic patients with myocardial dysfunction might have a better improvement of cardiac function by levosimendan than dobutamine (random effects, SMD = 1.05 [0.69,1.41]; I = 67%, P < 0.01). This study suggested a significant improvement of CI, LVSWI, and decrease of blood lactate in septic patients with myocardial dysfunction in ICU after 24-h administration of levosimendan than dobutamine. However, the administration of levosimendan has neither an impact on mortality nor LVEF. Septic patients with myocardial dysfunction may partly benefit from levosimendan than dobutamine, mainly embodied in cardiac function improvement.
左西孟旦和多巴酚丁胺被广泛用于治疗 ICU 中脓毒症相关的心血管衰竭。然而,左西孟旦在脓毒症性心肌病患者中的作用和机制仍不清楚。此外,关于左西孟旦是否优于多巴酚丁胺的先前研究仍存在争议。更重要的是,这些研究没有考虑到射血分数等定量参数的变化(与基线相比的前后比较),而基线水平是一个重要的参考指标。在这里,我们旨在通过评估心功能和血乳酸、死亡率的变化,使用标准化均数差作为汇总统计量来确定这两种药物的优缺点。通过对几个著名的学术数据库(包括 Google Scholar、PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆和 Embase)进行全面而有纪律的文献搜索,获得了相关研究,截至 2020 年 11 月。研究结果包括心功能、乳酸、死亡率和住院时间的变化。本研究共纳入 6 项随机对照试验,包括 192 名患者。与多巴酚丁胺相比,接受左西孟旦治疗的患者心指数(ΔCI)(随机效应,SMD=0.90[0.20,1.60];I=76%,P<0.01)和左心室每搏功指数(ΔLVSWI)(随机效应,SMD=1.56[0.90,2.21];I=65%,P=0.04)改善更大,血乳酸(Δblood lactate)(随机效应,MD= -0.79[-1.33,−0.25];I=68%,P<0.01)在药物干预后 24 小时分别显著降低。左西孟旦和多巴酚丁胺在 ICU 全因死亡率方面无显著差异(固定效应,OR=0.72[0.39,1.33];I=0%,P=0.99)。我们结合了与不同测量参数相关的效应大小来评估心功能,这表明左西孟旦可能比多巴酚丁胺更能改善心肌功能障碍的脓毒症患者的心功能(随机效应,SMD=1.05[0.69,1.41];I=67%,P<0.01)。这项研究表明,在给予左西孟旦 24 小时后,心肌功能障碍的脓毒症患者的 CI、LVSWI 显著改善,血乳酸水平降低。然而,左西孟旦的使用对死亡率和 LVEF 没有影响。心肌功能障碍的脓毒症患者可能会从左西孟旦中部分获益,主要表现在心功能的改善。