• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

III 期研究比较奥沙利铂加 S-1 与顺铂加 S-1 治疗初治晚期胃癌患者的疗效。

Phase III study comparing oxaliplatin plus S-1 with cisplatin plus S-1 in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced gastric cancer.

机构信息

Gastrointestinal Oncology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo.

Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University East Hospital, Sagamihara.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2015 Jan;26(1):141-148. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu472. Epub 2014 Oct 14.

DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdu472
PMID:25316259
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) as an alternative to cisplatin plus S-1 (CS) in first-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this randomized, open-label, multicenter phase III study, patients were randomly assigned to receive SOX (80-120 mg/day S-1 for 2 weeks with 100 mg/m(2) oxaliplatin on day 1, every 3 weeks) or CS (S-1 for 3 weeks with 60 mg/m(2) cisplatin on day 8, every 5 weeks). The primary end points were noninferiority in progression-free survival (PFS) and relative efficacy in overall survival (OS) for SOX using adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with stratification factors; performance status and unresectable or recurrent (+adjuvant chemotherapy) disease.

RESULTS

Overall, 685 patients were randomized from January 2010 to October 2011. In per-protocol population, SOX (n = 318) was noninferior to CS (n = 324) in PFS [median, 5.5 versus 5.4 months; HR 1.004, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.840-1.199; predefined noninferiority margin 1.30]. The median OS for SOX and CS were 14.1 and 13.1 months, respectively (HR 0.958 with 95% CI 0.803-1.142). In the intention-to-treat population (SOX, n = 339; CS, n = 337), the HRs in PFS and OS were 0.979 (95% CI 0.821-1.167) and 0.934 (95% CI 0.786-1.108), respectively. The most common ≥grade 3 adverse events (SOX versus CS) were neutropenia (19.5% versus 41.8%), anemia (15.1% versus 32.5%), hyponatremia (4.4% versus 13.4%), febrile neutropenia (0.9% versus 6.9%), and sensory neuropathy (4.7% versus 0%).

CONCLUSION

SOX is as effective as CS for AGC with favorable safety profile, therefore SOX can replace CS.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

JapicCTI-101021.

摘要

背景

我们评估了 S-1 加奥沙利铂(SOX)作为一线化疗治疗晚期胃癌(AGC)中顺铂加 S-1(CS)替代方案的疗效和安全性。

患者和方法

在这项随机、开放标签、多中心 III 期研究中,患者被随机分配接受 SOX(S-1 80-120mg/天,连用 2 周,第 1 天给予 100mg/m2奥沙利铂,每 3 周 1 次)或 CS(S-1 连用 3 周,第 8 天给予 60mg/m2顺铂,每 5 周 1 次)。主要终点是使用分层因素调整后的风险比(HR)评估 SOX 的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的非劣效性;表现状态和不可切除或复发(+辅助化疗)疾病。

结果

2010 年 1 月至 2011 年 10 月,共有 685 例患者入组。在方案人群中,SOX(n=318)与 CS(n=324)的 PFS 非劣效[中位,5.5 个月比 5.4 个月;HR 1.004,95%置信区间(CI)0.840-1.199;预设非劣效性边界 1.30]。SOX 和 CS 的中位 OS 分别为 14.1 个月和 13.1 个月(HR 0.958,95%CI 0.803-1.142)。在意向治疗人群(SOX,n=339;CS,n=337)中,PFS 和 OS 的 HR 分别为 0.979(95%CI 0.821-1.167)和 0.934(95%CI 0.786-1.108)。最常见的≥3 级不良事件(SOX 与 CS)是中性粒细胞减少症(19.5%与 41.8%)、贫血(15.1%与 32.5%)、低钠血症(4.4%与 13.4%)、发热性中性粒细胞减少症(0.9%与 6.9%)和感觉神经病变(4.7%与 0%)。

结论

SOX 对 AGC 的疗效与 CS 相当,安全性良好,因此 SOX 可替代 CS。

临床试验注册号

JapicCTI-101021。

相似文献

1
Phase III study comparing oxaliplatin plus S-1 with cisplatin plus S-1 in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced gastric cancer.III 期研究比较奥沙利铂加 S-1 与顺铂加 S-1 治疗初治晚期胃癌患者的疗效。
Ann Oncol. 2015 Jan;26(1):141-148. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu472. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
2
Early tumor shrinkage and depth of response in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective analysis of a randomized phase III study of first-line S-1 plus oxaliplatin vs. S-1 plus cisplatin.晚期胃癌患者的早期肿瘤退缩和深度缓解:一线 S-1 加奥沙利铂与 S-1 加顺铂的随机 III 期研究的回顾性分析。
Gastric Cancer. 2019 Jan;22(1):138-146. doi: 10.1007/s10120-018-0845-7. Epub 2018 Jun 9.
3
Meta-analysis supporting noninferiority of oxaliplatin plus S-1 to cisplatin plus S-1 in first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (G-SOX study): indirect comparison with S-1 alone.支持奥沙利铂联合S-1与顺铂联合S-1用于晚期胃癌一线治疗非劣效性的Meta分析(G-SOX研究):与单独使用S-1的间接比较
Int J Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug;21(4):668-675. doi: 10.1007/s10147-015-0938-9. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
4
Multicenter phase III trial of S-1 and cisplatin versus S-1 and oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SOPP trial).多中心 III 期临床试验:替吉奥(S-1)联合顺铂与 S-1 联合奥沙利铂方案一线治疗晚期胃癌(SOPP 试验)
Gastric Cancer. 2021 Jan;24(1):156-167. doi: 10.1007/s10120-020-01101-4. Epub 2020 Jun 28.
5
A phase II study of biweekly oxaliplatin plus S-1 combination chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with metastatic or advanced gastric cancer in China.一项关于每两周一次奥沙利铂联合S-1方案化疗作为中国转移性或晚期胃癌患者一线治疗的II期研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 May;98(20):e15696. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015696.
6
Leucovorin, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab versus S-1 and oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (SOFT): an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised phase 3 trial.亚叶酸钙、氟尿嘧啶、奥沙利铂联合贝伐珠单抗与 S-1 和奥沙利铂联合贝伐珠单抗治疗转移性结直肠癌患者(SOFT):一项开放标签、非劣效性、随机 3 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Dec;14(13):1278-86. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70490-X. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
7
S-1 plus leucovorin versus S-1 plus leucovorin and oxaliplatin versus S-1 plus cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial.替吉奥胶囊联合亚叶酸钙对比替吉奥胶囊联合奥沙利铂对比替吉奥胶囊联合顺铂一线治疗晚期胃癌的随机、多中心、开放标签、Ⅱ期临床研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jan;17(1):99-108. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00410-6. Epub 2015 Nov 28.
8
S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial.S-1联合顺铂与单用S-1作为晚期胃癌一线治疗的疗效比较(SPIRITS试验):一项III期试验
Lancet Oncol. 2008 Mar;9(3):215-21. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70035-4. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
9
S-1 plus oxaliplatin versus capecitabine plus oxaliplatin for first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomised, non-inferiority phase 3 trial.S-1 联合奥沙利铂对比卡培他滨联合奥沙利铂一线治疗转移性结直肠癌患者的随机、非劣效性 3 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Nov;13(11):1125-32. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70363-7. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
10
Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Oxaliplatin-based Chemotherapy for Advanced Gastric Cancer.奥沙利铂为基础的化疗方案治疗晚期胃癌的疗效与安全性分析
Anticancer Res. 2017 May;37(5):2663-2671. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.11614.

引用本文的文献

1
Immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy in conversion therapy for stage IV gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.免疫检查点抑制剂联合化疗用于IV期胃癌转化治疗的多中心回顾性队列研究
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2025 Sep 11;74(10):302. doi: 10.1007/s00262-025-04161-6.
2
Potential Resistance to Oxaliplatin-Based Regimens in Gastric Cancer Patients with ERBB2 R678Q Mutation: Evidence from a National Genomic Database.携带ERBB2基因R678Q突变的胃癌患者对基于奥沙利铂方案的潜在耐药性:来自国家基因组数据库的证据
Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2025 Jun 6;47(6):430. doi: 10.3390/cimb47060430.
3
Emerging role of circular RNAs in gastric cancer: From basic biology to clinical applications (Review).
环状RNA在胃癌中的新兴作用:从基础生物学到临床应用(综述)
Mol Med Rep. 2025 Sep;32(3). doi: 10.3892/mmr.2025.13617. Epub 2025 Jul 11.
4
Conversion therapy with sintilimab combined with chemotherapy and apatinib in stage IV gastric cancer.信迪利单抗联合化疗及阿帕替尼用于IV期胃癌的转化治疗
Int J Cancer. 2025 Oct 15;157(8):1637-1647. doi: 10.1002/ijc.35511. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
5
Impact of cancer type differences on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) incidence in oxaliplatin-based regimens for gastric and colorectal cancer: a retrospective study.癌症类型差异对基于奥沙利铂的胃癌和结直肠癌化疗方案所致恶心和呕吐(CINV)发生率的影响:一项回顾性研究
Int J Clin Oncol. 2025 Jun 5. doi: 10.1007/s10147-025-02804-3.
6
Safety and efficacy of apatinib in combination treatment versus apatinib as second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer.阿帕替尼联合治疗与阿帕替尼作为晚期胃癌二线治疗的安全性和疗效
Front Oncol. 2025 Apr 30;15:1587069. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1587069. eCollection 2025.
7
Quadruple therapy with immunotherapy and chemotherapy as first-line conversion treatment for unresectable advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: A case report.免疫疗法联合化疗的四联疗法作为不可切除的晚期胃腺癌一线转化治疗:病例报告
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2025 Apr 15;17(4):102258. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i4.102258.
8
A phase I/II trial evaluating the safety of increased-dose S- 1 with oxaliplatin and nivolumab in HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer.一项评估增加剂量的S-1联合奥沙利铂和纳武单抗用于HER2阴性晚期胃癌安全性的I/II期试验。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Apr 12;25(1):675. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14084-1.
9
Impact of the SOX Regimen on Immune Function and Tumor Markers in Advanced Gastric Cancer.SOX方案对晚期胃癌免疫功能和肿瘤标志物的影响
Int J Gen Med. 2025 Mar 11;18:1415-1422. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S509902. eCollection 2025.
10
Comparison of PSOX (paclitaxel, oxaliplatin, S-1) and SOX (oxaliplatin, S-1) as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II-III gastric cancer.PSOX(紫杉醇、奥沙利铂、S-1)与SOX(奥沙利铂、S-1)作为II-III期胃癌术后辅助化疗的比较。
World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar 7;23(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03723-3.