Suppr超能文献

多中心 III 期临床试验:替吉奥(S-1)联合顺铂与 S-1 联合奥沙利铂方案一线治疗晚期胃癌(SOPP 试验)

Multicenter phase III trial of S-1 and cisplatin versus S-1 and oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SOPP trial).

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.

Department of Hematology-Oncology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Gastric Cancer. 2021 Jan;24(1):156-167. doi: 10.1007/s10120-020-01101-4. Epub 2020 Jun 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In East Asia, S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) is one of the standard first-line chemotherapy regimens for metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer (MRGC). Oxaliplatin is generally less toxic and more convenient to administer than cisplatin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a multicenter, phase III study assessing whether S-1/oxaliplatin (SOX) was non-inferior/superior to SP in terms of progression-free survival (PFS). Patients with MRGC were randomized 1:1 to receive either SOX (S-1 80 mg/m/day on days 1-14; oxaliplatin 130 mg/m on day 1; every 3 weeks) or SP (S-1 80 mg/m/day on days 1-14; cisplatin 60 mg/m on day 1; every 3 weeks [SP3]).

RESULTS

Between October 2012 and October 2014, 338 patients were randomized. The median age was 56 years, and 51% of patients had measurable lesions. SOX was significantly non-inferior but not superior to SP3 in terms of PFS [median 5.6 versus 5.7 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-1.07]. In patients with measurable disease, objective response rates were similar between SOX and SP3 (58% versus 60%). Overall, the survival in both groups did not differ (median 12.9 versus 11.4 months; HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.66-1.11). Treatment was well tolerated in both arms. Anemia, leucopenia, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and oral mucositis were more common with SP3. In contrast, thrombocytopenia, nausea, vomiting, and peripheral neuropathy were more common with SOX.

CONCLUSIONS

SOX was non-inferior to SP3. The two regimens were well tolerated with different toxicity profiles. The SOX regimen can be recommended as a first-line treatment for MRGC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01671449.

摘要

背景

在东亚,S-1 加顺铂(SP)是转移性或复发性胃癌(MRGC)的标准一线化疗方案之一。奥沙利铂通常比顺铂毒性更小,给药更方便。

患者和方法

这是一项多中心、III 期研究,旨在评估 S-1/奥沙利铂(SOX)在无进展生存期(PFS)方面是否不劣于/优于 SP。MRGC 患者按 1:1 随机接受 SOX(S-1 80mg/m/天,第 1-14 天;奥沙利铂 130mg/m,第 1 天;每 3 周)或 SP(S-1 80mg/m/天,第 1-14 天;顺铂 60mg/m,第 1 天;每 3 周[SP3])治疗。

结果

2012 年 10 月至 2014 年 10 月,338 名患者被随机分组。中位年龄为 56 岁,51%的患者有可测量病灶。SOX 在 PFS 方面显著不劣于但不优于 SP3[中位 5.6 与 5.7 个月;风险比(HR)0.85;95%置信区间(CI)0.67-1.07]。在有可测量疾病的患者中,SOX 和 SP3 的客观缓解率相似(58%与 60%)。总体而言,两组的生存情况无差异(中位 12.9 与 11.4 个月;HR 0.86;95%CI 0.66-1.11)。两组治疗均耐受良好。SP3 更常见贫血、白细胞减少、中性粒细胞减少、发热性中性粒细胞减少和口腔黏膜炎。相比之下,SOX 更常见血小板减少、恶心、呕吐和周围神经病变。

结论

SOX 不劣于 SP3。两种方案均耐受良好,毒性谱不同。SOX 方案可作为 MRGC 的一线治疗推荐。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT01671449。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验