Suppr超能文献

塔达公式与软件切片器的比较:一种用于评估脑内血肿体积的精确且低成本的方法。

Comparison of the Tada formula with software slicer: precise and low-cost method for volume assessment of intracerebral hematoma.

作者信息

Xu Xinghua, Chen Xiaolei, Zhang Jun, Zheng Yi, Sun Guochen, Yu Xinguang, Xu Bainan

机构信息

From the Department of Neurosurgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Stroke. 2014 Nov;45(11):3433-5. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007095. Epub 2014 Oct 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The Tada (ABC/2) formula has been used widely for volume assessment of intracerebral hematoma. However, the formula is crude for irregularly shaped hematoma. We aimed to compare the accuracy of the ABC/2 formula with open source software Slicer.

METHODS

Computed tomographic images of 294 patients with spontaneous intracerebral hematoma were collected. Hematoma volumes were assessed with the ABC/2 formula and calculated with software 3D Slicer. Results of these 2 methods were compared with regard to hematoma size and shape.

RESULTS

The estimated hematoma volume was 58.41±37.83 cm(3) using the ABC/2 formula, compared with 50.38±31.93 cm(3) with 3D Slicer (mean percentage deviation, 16.38±9.15%). When allocate patients into groups according to hematoma size, the mean estimation error were 3.24 cm(3) (17.72%), 5.85 cm(3) (13.72%), and 15.14 cm(3) (17.48%) for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. When divided by shape, estimation error was 3.33 cm(3) (9.76%), 7.19 cm(3) (18.37%), and 29.39 cm(3) (39.12%) for regular, irregular, and multilobular hematomas.

CONCLUSIONS

There is significant estimation error using the ABC/2 formula to calculate hematoma volume. Compared with hematoma size, estimation error is more significantly associated with hematoma shape.

摘要

背景与目的

塔达(ABC/2)公式已被广泛用于评估脑内血肿体积。然而,该公式对于形状不规则的血肿并不适用。我们旨在比较ABC/2公式与开源软件Slicer的准确性。

方法

收集了294例自发性脑内血肿患者的计算机断层扫描图像。使用ABC/2公式评估血肿体积,并通过3D Slicer软件进行计算。比较这两种方法在血肿大小和形状方面的结果。

结果

使用ABC/2公式估计的血肿体积为58.41±37.83 cm³,而3D Slicer计算的结果为50.38±31.93 cm³(平均百分比偏差为16.38±9.15%)。根据血肿大小将患者分组后,第1、2和3组的平均估计误差分别为3.24 cm³(17.72%)、5.85 cm³(13.72%)和15.14 cm³(17.48%)。按形状划分时,规则、不规则和多叶形血肿的估计误差分别为3.33 cm³(9.76%)、7.19 cm³(18.37%)和29.39 cm³(39.12%)。

结论

使用ABC/2公式计算血肿体积存在显著的估计误差。与血肿大小相比,估计误差与血肿形状的相关性更大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验