• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创治疗自发性高血压性脑出血(MISICH):一项多中心随机对照试验。

Minimally invasive surgeries for spontaneous hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (MISICH): a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China.

Department of Neurosurgery, Jingzhou Central Hospital, Hubei, China.

出版信息

BMC Med. 2024 Jun 13;22(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03468-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12916-024-03468-y
PMID:38867192
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11170771/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a common stroke type with high morbidity and mortality. There are mainly three surgical methods for treating ICH. Unfortunately, thus far, no specific surgical method has been proven to be the most effective. We carried out this study to investigate whether minimally invasive surgeries with endoscopic surgery or stereotactic aspiration (frameless navigated aspiration) will improve functional outcomes in patients with supratentorial ICH compared with small-bone flap craniotomy.

METHODS

In this parallel-group multicenter randomized controlled trial conducted at 16 centers, patients with supratentorial hypertensive ICH were randomized to receive endoscopic surgery, stereotactic aspiration, or craniotomy at a 1:1:1 ratio from July 2016 to June 2022. The follow-up duration was 6 months. Patients were randomized to receive endoscopic evacuation, stereotactic aspiration, or small-bone flap craniotomy. The primary outcome was favorable functional outcome, defined as the proportion of patients who achieved a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0-2 at the 6-month follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 733 patients were randomly allocated to three groups: 243 to the endoscopy group, 247 to the aspiration group, and 243 to the craniotomy group. Finally, 721 patients (239 in the endoscopy group, 246 in the aspiration group, and 236 in the craniotomy group) received treatment and were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Primary efficacy analysis revealed that 73 of 219 (33.3%) in the endoscopy group, 72 of 220 (32.7%) in the aspiration group, and 47 of 212 (22.2%) in the craniotomy group achieved favorable functional outcome at the 6-month follow-up (P = .017). We got similar results in subgroup analysis of deep hemorrhages, while in lobar hemorrhages the prognostic outcome was similar among three groups. Old age, deep hematoma location, large hematoma volume, low preoperative GCS score, craniotomy, and intracranial infection were associated with greater odds of unfavorable outcomes. The mean hospitalization expenses were ¥92,420 in the endoscopy group, ¥77,351 in the aspiration group, and ¥100,947 in the craniotomy group (P = .000).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with small bone flap craniotomy, endoscopic surgery and stereotactic aspiration improved the long-term outcome of hypertensive ICH, especially deep hemorrhages.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02811614.

摘要

背景

脑出血(ICH)是一种常见的脑卒中类型,具有高发病率和死亡率。目前主要有三种手术方法可用于治疗 ICH。遗憾的是,迄今为止,尚无特定的手术方法被证明是最有效的。我们开展这项研究旨在探讨与小骨瓣开颅术相比,内镜手术或立体定向抽吸(无框架导航抽吸)的微创手术是否会改善幕上 ICH 患者的功能预后。

方法

本项平行分组多中心随机对照试验在 16 家中心进行,纳入了 2016 年 7 月至 2022 年 6 月间患有幕上高血压性 ICH 的患者,按 1:1:1 的比例随机分配至内镜手术组、立体定向抽吸组或小骨瓣开颅术组。随访时间为 6 个月。患者随机分配至内镜清除术、立体定向抽吸或小骨瓣开颅术。主要结局为有利的功能预后,定义为在 6 个月随访时达到改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)评分 0-2 的患者比例。

结果

共纳入 733 例患者,按 3 组随机分配:内镜组 243 例,抽吸组 247 例,开颅组 243 例。最终,721 例患者(内镜组 239 例,抽吸组 246 例,开颅组 236 例)接受了治疗并纳入意向治疗分析。主要疗效分析显示,内镜组 219 例患者中 73 例(33.3%)、抽吸组 220 例患者中 72 例(32.7%)和开颅组 212 例患者中 47 例(22.2%)在 6 个月随访时达到了有利的功能预后(P=0.017)。我们在深部出血的亚组分析中得到了相似的结果,而在脑叶出血中,三组的预后结果相似。高龄、深部血肿位置、较大的血肿体积、术前 GCS 评分较低、开颅术和颅内感染与不良结局的可能性更大相关。内镜组的平均住院费用为 92420 元,抽吸组为 77351 元,开颅组为 100947 元(P=0.000)。

结论

与小骨瓣开颅术相比,内镜手术和立体定向抽吸术改善了高血压性 ICH 的长期预后,特别是深部出血患者的预后。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02811614。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3dc/11170771/835f97ac8ac4/12916_2024_3468_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3dc/11170771/ea38900724fb/12916_2024_3468_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3dc/11170771/835f97ac8ac4/12916_2024_3468_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3dc/11170771/ea38900724fb/12916_2024_3468_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3dc/11170771/835f97ac8ac4/12916_2024_3468_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Minimally invasive surgeries for spontaneous hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (MISICH): a multicenter randomized controlled trial.微创治疗自发性高血压性脑出血(MISICH):一项多中心随机对照试验。
BMC Med. 2024 Jun 13;22(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03468-y.
2
Comparison of endoscopic evacuation, stereotactic aspiration and craniotomy for the treatment of supratentorial hypertensive intracerebral haemorrhage: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.内镜下血肿清除术、立体定向血肿抽吸术与开颅手术治疗幕上高血压性脑出血的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Jun 28;18(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2041-1.
3
Effectiveness of endoscopic surgery for supratentorial hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage: a comparison with craniotomy.内镜手术治疗幕上高血压性脑出血的效果:与开颅术的比较。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Feb;128(2):553-559. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.JNS161589. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
4
Surgical Evacuation of Spontaneous Supratentorial Lobar Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Stereotactic Aspiration, Endoscopic Surgery, and Craniotomy.自发性幕上脑叶脑出血的手术清除:立体定向抽吸术、内镜手术和开颅手术的安全性与疗效比较
World Neurosurg. 2017 Sep;105:332-340. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.05.134. Epub 2017 May 31.
5
Intraoperative CT and cone-beam CT imaging for minimally invasive evacuation of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.术中 CT 和锥形束 CT 成像在自发性脑出血微创清除术中的应用。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Dec;162(12):3167-3177. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04284-y. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
6
Treatment outcomes between endoscopic surgery and conventional craniotomy for spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage: a randomized controlled trial.内镜手术与传统开颅手术治疗自发性幕上脑内出血的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验。
Neurosurg Rev. 2023 Jun 6;46(1):136. doi: 10.1007/s10143-023-02035-y.
7
Minimally invasive surgery treatment for the patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage (MISTICH): protocol of a multi-center randomized controlled trial.自发性幕上脑出血患者的微创手术治疗(MISTICH):一项多中心随机对照试验方案
BMC Neurol. 2014 Oct 10;14:206. doi: 10.1186/s12883-014-0206-z.
8
Endoscopic surgery for spontaneous basal ganglia hemorrhage: comparing endoscopic surgery, stereotactic aspiration, and craniotomy in noncomatose patients.自发性基底节区脑出血的内镜手术:非昏迷患者内镜手术、立体定向抽吸术和开颅手术的比较
Surg Neurol. 2006 Jun;65(6):547-55; discussion 555-6. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2005.09.032.
9
Outcomes After Endoscopic Evacuation Versus Evacuation Using Craniotomy or Stereotactic Aspiration for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Analysis Using a Japanese Nationwide Database.内镜清除术与开颅术或立体定向抽吸术治疗自发性脑出血的结局比较:利用日本全国数据库进行的分析。
Neurocrit Care. 2023 Jun;38(3):667-675. doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01634-9. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
10
Minimally Invasive Surgery for Patients with Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage with Large Hematoma Volume: A Retrospective Study.微创外科手术治疗大血肿量高血压性脑出血患者的回顾性研究
World Neurosurg. 2017 Sep;105:348-358. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.05.158. Epub 2017 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Neuroendoscopy versus Craniotomy for Spontaneous Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhage: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Non-Randomized Studies.神经内镜与开颅手术治疗自发性幕上脑出血的疗效与安全性:随机和非随机研究的最新荟萃分析
Brain Behav. 2025 Sep;15(9):e70581. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70581.
2
Value of the spot sign combined with the blend sign for predicting the outcome of patients with intracerebral hemorrhage who have undergone stereotactic minimally invasive surgery.斑点征联合融合征对预测接受立体定向微创手术的脑出血患者预后的价值。
Front Neurol. 2025 Aug 6;16:1577675. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1577675. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Chinese multidisciplinary guideline for management of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.《中国高血压性脑出血管理多学科指南》
Chin Med J (Engl). 2022 Oct 5;135(19):2269-2271. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001976.
2
Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage.自发性脑出血
N Engl J Med. 2022 Oct 27;387(17):1589-1596. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2201449.
3
Smartphone navigated endoscopic port surgery of hypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhage.智能手机导航下高血压性基底节脑出血的内镜端口手术
Minimally invasive surgery for bilateral large basal ganglia hemorrhage: a rare case report and insights from literature.
双侧基底节区大量出血的微创手术:1例罕见病例报告及文献见解
AME Case Rep. 2025 Jul 15;9:103. doi: 10.21037/acr-25-17. eCollection 2025.
4
Comparative analysis of the efficacy of neuro-endoscopy versus conventional surgery in the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.神经内镜与传统手术治疗高血压性脑出血疗效的对比分析
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Jul 12;48(1):563. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03720-w.
5
Safety and Efficacy of Stereotactic Aspiration with Fibrinolysis for Supratentorial Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhages: A Single-Center Experience.立体定向抽吸联合纤溶治疗幕上自发性脑出血的安全性和有效性:单中心经验
J Clin Med. 2025 May 22;14(11):3636. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113636.
6
Minimally Invasive Surgery Versus Conventional Neurosurgical Treatments for Patients with Subcortical Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Nationwide Study of Real-World Data from 2016 to 2022.微创外科手术与传统神经外科治疗方法治疗幕上皮质下脑出血患者的比较:一项基于2016年至2022年全国真实世界数据的研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 May 23;15(11):1308. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15111308.
7
Effectiveness of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Aspiration with Catheter Insertion: Impact on Hematoma Volume and Symptom Improvement.导管插入式脑出血抽吸术的有效性:对血肿体积及症状改善的影响
Brain Sci. 2025 Apr 26;15(5):455. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15050455.
8
Outcomes, neurological function, and inflammation indices following minimally invasive hematoma removal in hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage patients.高血压脑出血患者微创血肿清除术后的结局、神经功能及炎症指标
Am J Transl Res. 2025 Feb 25;17(2):1510-1521. doi: 10.62347/NQYU7306. eCollection 2025.
9
Minimally Invasive Surgery for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Review.自发性脑出血的微创手术:综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 11;14(4):1155. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041155.
10
Long-term efficacy and safety of endoscopic surgery versus small bone window craniotomy for spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.内镜手术与小骨窗开颅术治疗自发性幕上脑出血的长期疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析和试验序贯分析
BMC Neurol. 2025 Feb 8;25(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12883-025-04023-9.
J Clin Neurosci. 2022 Jul;101:193-197. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.05.012. Epub 2022 May 21.
4
2022 Guideline for the Management of Patients With Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.2022年自发性脑出血患者管理指南:美国心脏协会/美国中风协会指南
Stroke. 2022 Jul;53(7):e282-e361. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000407. Epub 2022 May 17.
5
Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.1990—2019年全球、区域和国家的卒中负担及其风险因素:全球疾病负担研究2019的系统分析
Lancet Neurol. 2021 Oct;20(10):795-820. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00252-0. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
6
Intracerebral Hemorrhage Volume Reduction and Timing of Intervention Versus Functional Benefit and Survival in the MISTIE III and STICH Trials.颅内出血体积减少与干预时机对 MISTIE III 和 STICH 试验的功能获益和生存的影响。
Neurosurgery. 2021 Apr 15;88(5):961-970. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa572.
7
Minimally invasive puncture versus conventional craniotomy for spontaneous supratentorial hemorrhage: A meta-analysis.微创穿刺术与传统开颅手术治疗自发性幕上脑出血的Meta分析
Neurochirurgie. 2021 Jul;67(4):375-382. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2020.11.004. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
8
Burden of Neurological Disorders Across the US From 1990-2017: A Global Burden of Disease Study.《1990-2017 年美国神经障碍疾病负担:全球疾病负担研究》
JAMA Neurol. 2021 Feb 1;78(2):165-176. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.4152.
9
Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.204 个国家和地区 1990-2019 年 369 种疾病和伤害导致的全球负担:2019 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1204-1222. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9.
10
Decompressive Craniectomy in Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Comparison with Standard Craniotomy Using Propensity-Matched Analysis.自发性脑出血的减压性颅骨切除术:使用倾向评分匹配分析与标准开颅手术的比较
World Neurosurg. 2020 Dec;144:e622-e630. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.09.016. Epub 2020 Sep 8.