Yeo Khung Keong, Maddox Thomas M, Carey Evan, Low Reginald I, Shunk Kendrick A
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California; Department of Cardiology, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Cardiology Section, Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver, Colorado; Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado.
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Dec 1;114(11):1758-62. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.08.047. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
The rate of concurrent right-heart catheterization (RHC) in patients undergoing left-heart catheterization (LHC) for coronary artery disease (CAD) indications or bilateral heart catheterization (BHC) is recommended as a measure of hospital quality, with higher rates suggesting over utilization. Our aim was to describe the prevalence of BHC and abnormal RHC findings in patients undergoing BHC with a primary indication for LHC. A retrospective analysis was performed for patients undergoing cardiac catheterization for CAD indications using the Department of Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking Program. Patients undergoing catheterization from October 2007 to September 2011 in 76 Veterans Affairs hospitals were included. Among 95,656 patients undergoing catheterization for CAD, 6,611 (6.9%) underwent BHC and 88,929 (93.0%) LHC. Among the patients undergoing BHC, 61.3% had at least 1 of the following abnormal RHC values: mean pulmonary artery (PA) pressure >25 mm Hg, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) >15 mm Hg, or pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) >3 Woods units. A total of 37.5% of patients had mean PA pressures of 26 to 40 mm Hg and 11.1% had mean PA pressures >40 mm Hg. A total of 34.4% of patients had mean PCWP of 16 to 25 mm Hg and 13.6% had mean PAWP >25 mm Hg. A total of 16.5% of patients had PVR between 3 and 6 WU and 2.9% had PVR >6 WU. A total of 4.3% of patients met formal criteria for pulmonary arterial hypertension (defined as the combination of PA mean >25 mm Hg, PCWP ≤15 mm Hg, and PVR >3). In conclusion, these findings suggest that most BHC were performed for appropriate clinical reasons. Future studies should further explore BHC rate as an effective quality indicator.
对于因冠状动脉疾病(CAD)适应证接受左心导管检查(LHC)或双侧心导管检查(BHC)的患者,推荐使用同步右心导管检查(RHC)的比率作为衡量医院质量的一项指标,比率越高表明存在过度使用的情况。我们的目的是描述以LHC作为主要适应证接受BHC的患者中BHC的患病率以及RHC异常结果。使用退伍军人事务部临床评估报告与跟踪项目,对因CAD适应证接受心导管检查的患者进行了回顾性分析。纳入了2007年10月至2011年9月期间在76家退伍军人事务医院接受导管检查的患者。在95,656例因CAD接受导管检查的患者中,6,611例(6.9%)接受了BHC,88,929例(93.0%)接受了LHC。在接受BHC的患者中,61.3%至少有以下一项RHC异常值:平均肺动脉(PA)压>25 mmHg、肺毛细血管楔压(PCWP)>15 mmHg或肺血管阻力(PVR)>3伍兹单位。共有37.5%的患者平均PA压为26至40 mmHg且11.1%的患者平均PA压>40 mmHg。共有34.4%的患者平均PCWP为16至25 mmHg且13.6%的患者平均PAWP>25 mmHg。共有16.5%的患者PVR在3至6 WU之间且2.9%的患者PVR>6 WU。共有4.3%的患者符合肺动脉高压的正式标准(定义为PA平均压>25 mmHg、PCWP≤15 mmHg和PVR>3)。总之,这些结果表明大多数BHC是出于适当的临床原因进行的。未来的研究应进一步探讨BHC比率作为一项有效的质量指标。