• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内沙布尔孕妇再次剖宫产偏好的相关因素。

Factors associated with preference for repeat cesarean in neyshabur pregnant women.

作者信息

Gholami Ali, Faraji Zahra, Lotfabadi Pegah, Foroozanfar Zohre, Rezaof Mitra, Rajabi Abdolhalim

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences, Neyshabur, Iran ; Department of Epidemiology, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Library and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Int J Prev Med. 2014 Sep;5(9):1192-8.

PMID:25317304
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4192783/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cesarean delivery is a surgery for deliver a baby. Women with previous cesarean delivery (CD) must often choose between a vaginal delivery (VD) and repeat CD. Our aim of this study was to investigate factors associated with preference for CD in Neyshabur pregnant women with previous CD.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted on all pregnant women (who had previous caesarean delivery) from February 20, 2011 to March 20, 2011 in Northeast of Iran (Neyshabur). Logistic regression model was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

The mean age of pregnant women was 29.95 ± 4.94 years. In this study of the 292 pregnant women, 235 (80.5%) said they prefer CD. There was a statistically significant relation between preference for CD and the following variables: pregnant women's educational level (P < 0.001; OR = 3.86; 95% CI = 1.85-8.05) and doctor's advice (P = 0.021; OR = 3.55; 95% CI = 1.21-10.43). The pregnant women with a previous CD presented four-fold upper chance of choosing CD.

CONCLUSIONS

As observed in this study, most pregnant women with previous caesarean delivery prefer repeated caesarean delivery rather than VD in their subsequent pregnancy and educational level of pregnant women and doctor's advice were important factors that influenced this preference. This subject suggests the need to counsel pregnant women with an obstetrician before select delivery type.

摘要

背景

剖宫产是一种分娩手术。有过剖宫产史的女性在经阴道分娩(VD)和再次剖宫产之间常常需要做出选择。本研究的目的是调查伊朗东北部内沙布尔有过剖宫产史的孕妇中与剖宫产偏好相关的因素。

方法

2011年2月20日至2011年3月20日,对伊朗东北部(内沙布尔)所有有过剖宫产史的孕妇进行了一项横断面研究。采用逻辑回归模型估计比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

孕妇的平均年龄为29.95±4.94岁。在这项对292名孕妇的研究中,235名(80.5%)表示她们更倾向于剖宫产。剖宫产偏好与以下变量之间存在统计学显著关系:孕妇的教育水平(P<0.001;OR = 3.86;95%CI = 1.85 - 8.05)和医生的建议(P = 0.021;OR = 3.55;95%CI = 1.21 - 10.43)。有过剖宫产史的孕妇选择剖宫产的可能性高出四倍。

结论

如本研究中所观察到的,大多数有过剖宫产史的孕妇在随后的妊娠中更倾向于再次剖宫产而非经阴道分娩,孕妇的教育水平和医生的建议是影响这种偏好的重要因素。这一情况表明在选择分娩方式之前需要产科医生为孕妇提供咨询。

相似文献

1
Factors associated with preference for repeat cesarean in neyshabur pregnant women.内沙布尔孕妇再次剖宫产偏好的相关因素。
Int J Prev Med. 2014 Sep;5(9):1192-8.
2
Why do some pregnant women prefer cesarean delivery in first pregnancy?为什么有些孕妇在首次怀孕时更倾向于剖宫产?
Iran J Reprod Med. 2013 Apr;11(4):301-8.
3
Trial of labour or elective repeat caesarean delivery:are women making an informed decision at Kenyatta national hospital?试产或选择性重复剖宫产术:肯雅塔国家医院的女性是否做出了知情决策?
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Aug 15;17(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1440-3.
4
Prior childbirth experience and attitude towards subsequent vaginal birth after one caesarean delivery in Lagos, Nigeria: a cross-sectional study.尼日利亚拉各斯首次剖宫产术后再次经阴道分娩的既往分娩经历和态度:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Jan 30;23(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05348-4.
5
Deciding on the mode of birth after a previous caesarean section - An online survey investigating women's preferences in Western Switzerland.既往剖宫产术后分娩方式的选择——一项调查瑞士西部女性偏好的在线调查
Midwifery. 2017 Jul;50:219-227. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
6
Preference of cesarean delivery and its associated factors among pregnant women attending ante natal care at public health facilities of Debrebrehan City, Ethiopia: Cross-sectional study.在埃塞俄比亚德布雷伯汉市的公共卫生机构接受产前护理的孕妇对剖宫产的偏好及其相关因素:横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 31;19(1):e0296990. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296990. eCollection 2024.
7
Delivery Mode Preference and Associated Factors among Pregnant Mothers in Harar Regional State, Eastern Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study.埃塞俄比亚东部哈拉尔州孕妇的分娩方式偏好及相关因素:一项横断面研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 May 10;2021:1751578. doi: 10.1155/2021/1751578. eCollection 2021.
8
Factors Influencing Polish Women's Preference for the Mode of Delivery and Shared-Decision Making: Has Anything Changed over the Last Decade?影响波兰妇女生育方式偏好和共同决策的因素:过去十年有变化吗?
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Dec 3;58(12):1782. doi: 10.3390/medicina58121782.
9
Chilean women's preferences regarding mode of delivery: which do they prefer and why?智利女性对分娩方式的偏好:她们更喜欢哪种方式以及原因是什么?
BJOG. 2006 Nov;113(11):1253-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01069.x. Epub 2006 Oct 2.
10
Mode of Delivery Preference Among Pregnant Nulliparous Women.分娩方式偏好:初产妇。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 Jun;28(6):874-884. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.6989. Epub 2018 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors influencing decision-making to accept elective caesarean section: A descriptive cross-sectional study.影响接受择期剖宫产决策的因素:一项描述性横断面研究。
Heliyon. 2021 Aug 11;7(8):e07755. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07755. eCollection 2021 Aug.
2
Prevalence of and reasons for women's, family members', and health professionals' preferences for cesarean section in Iran: a mixed-methods systematic review.伊朗妇女、家庭成员和卫生专业人员选择剖宫产的流行情况及原因:一项混合方法系统评价。
Reprod Health. 2021 Jan 2;18(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-01047-x.
3
Non-Clinical Variables Influencing Cesarean Section Rate According to Robson Classification.根据罗伯逊分类法,影响剖宫产率的非临床变量。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Apr 15;56(4):180. doi: 10.3390/medicina56040180.
4
Risk factors for C-section delivery and population attributable risk for C-section risk factors in Southwest of Iran: a prospective cohort study.伊朗西南部剖宫产分娩的危险因素及剖宫产危险因素的人群归因风险:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2015 Nov 16;29:294. eCollection 2015.

本文引用的文献

1
Interventions for supporting pregnant women's decision-making about mode of birth after a caesarean.支持剖宫产术后孕妇做出分娩方式决策的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 30;2013(7):CD010041. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010041.pub2.
2
Elective cesarean delivery on maternal request.产妇要求选择性剖宫产术。
JAMA. 2013 May 8;309(18):1930-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.3982.
3
Why women request cesarean section without medical indication?为何女性会在无医学指征的情况下要求剖宫产?
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011 Sep;24(9):1133-7. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2010.531327. Epub 2011 Jun 13.
4
Recent trends and patterns in cesarean and vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) deliveries in the United States.美国剖宫产和剖宫产后阴道分娩(VBAC)的最新趋势和模式。
Clin Perinatol. 2011 Jun;38(2):179-92. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2011.03.007.
5
Why do some pregnant women prefer cesarean? The influence of parity, delivery experiences, and fear.为什么有些孕妇更喜欢剖宫产?产次、分娩经历和恐惧的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;205(1):45.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.03.043. Epub 2011 Mar 26.
6
Women's preference for caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.女性对剖宫产的偏好:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BJOG. 2011 Mar;118(4):391-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02793.x. Epub 2010 Dec 7.
7
Delivery after previous cesarean: short-term perinatal outcomes.前次剖宫产术后分娩:近期围生期结局。
Semin Perinatol. 2010 Aug;34(4):272-80. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2010.03.007.
8
Behind the myth--few women prefer caesarean section in the absence of medical or obstetrical factors.背后的真相——在不存在医学或产科因素的情况下,很少有女性选择剖宫产。
Midwifery. 2011 Oct;27(5):620-7. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.05.005. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
9
Women's preference for cesarean delivery and differences between Taiwanese women undergoing different modes of delivery.妇女对剖宫产的偏好及不同分娩方式的台湾妇女之间的差异。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 May 26;10:138. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-138.
10
Birth after caesarean section: changes over a nine-year period in one Australian state.剖宫产术后分娩:澳大利亚一个州九年期间的变化。
Midwifery. 2011 Apr;27(2):165-9. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2009.04.009. Epub 2009 Sep 20.