Bonzon Magali, Gross Mechthild M, Karch André, Grylka-Baeschlin Susanne
Midwifery Research and Education Unit, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany.
Department of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research (HZI), Inhoffenstr. 7, D-38124 Braunschweig, Germany.
Midwifery. 2017 Jul;50:219-227. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
promoting vaginal births after caesarean section (VBAC) for eligible women and increasing rates of successful VBACs are the best strategies to reduce the number of repeat caesarean sections (CS). Knowledge of factors that are associated with women's decision-making around mode of birth after CS is important when developing strategies to promote VBAC. This study assessed which factors are associated with women's preferences for VBAC versus elective repeat caesarean section (ERCS) in a new pregnancy after one previous caesarean in Switzerland.
cross-sectional web-survey.
Western Switzerland.
French-speaking women living in Western Switzerland, with one previous CS who gave birth subsequently to a child after a complication-free pregnancy were eligible to participate in the survey. Of 393 women who started the survey in November/December 2014, 349 were included: 227 who planned a VBAC and 122 who planned an ERCS at term.
univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted to describe and compare women who had planned a VBAC with women who had planned an ERCS in a pregnancy following a CS. Logistic regression modelling was used to investigate predictors that were associated with a preference for a VBAC at term. Analyses were performed with SPSS 22 and Stata 13.
of the women planning a VBAC, 62.6% VBAC gave birth vaginally. Predictors which were significantly associated with increased odds of women choosing a VBAC: duration since previous birth in years (OR=1.11 95% CI [1.03-1.20], p=0.010), having had midwifery care during pregnancy (OR=2.09, 95% CI [1.08-4.05], p=0.029), being advised by their healthcare provider to attempt a VBAC (OR=4.20, 95% CI [1.75-10.09], p=0.001), preference for VBAC during the third trimester of their pregnancy (OR=3.98, 95% CI [1.77-8.93], p=0.001), and wishing to let the child choose the moment of birth (OR=1.46, 95% CI[1.22-1.74], p<0.001). The importance of safety for the mother decreased the odds of women preferring a VBAC (OR=0.74, 95% CI [0.60-0.90], p=0.003) while a motivation for more immediate bonding with the baby after birth increased the odds of preferring a VBAC at term (OR=1.25, 95% CI [1.06-1.46], p=0.007).
caregivers' recommendations about mode of birth after CS, women's preferences during the third trimester and midwifery care during pregnancy were found to be the most important predictors for preferring a VBAC at term. These results indicate that midwifery antenatal care might be a key factor for fostering women's preference for a VBAC.
women with a history of CS who feel ambivalent about the mode of birth are likely to benefit from access to midwifery support.
对于符合条件的女性,促进剖宫产术后经阴道分娩(VBAC)并提高VBAC成功率是减少再次剖宫产(CS)数量的最佳策略。在制定促进VBAC的策略时,了解与女性剖宫产术后分娩方式决策相关的因素非常重要。本研究评估了在瑞士,既往有一次剖宫产史的女性在再次妊娠时,哪些因素与她们选择VBAC而非选择性再次剖宫产(ERCS)的偏好相关。
横断面网络调查。
瑞士西部。
居住在瑞士西部、既往有一次剖宫产史且在无并发症妊娠后分娩的法语女性有资格参与调查。在2014年11月/12月开始调查的393名女性中,349名被纳入研究:227名计划VBAC,122名计划足月ERCS。
进行单变量和多变量分析,以描述和比较既往剖宫产史女性中计划VBAC的女性与计划ERCS的女性。采用逻辑回归模型研究与足月时偏好VBAC相关的预测因素。使用SPSS 22和Stata 13进行分析。
计划VBAC的女性中,62.6%经阴道分娩。与女性选择VBAC几率增加显著相关的预测因素有:自上次分娩以来的年数(OR=1.11,95%CI[1.03 - 1.20],p = 0.010)、孕期接受过助产护理(OR = 2.09,95%CI[1.08 - 4.05],p = 0.029)、医疗保健提供者建议尝试VBAC(OR = 4.20,95%CI[1.75 - 10.09],p = 0.001)、孕期第三个月偏好VBAC(OR = 3.98,95%CI[1.77 - 8.93],p = 0.001)以及希望让孩子选择出生时刻(OR = 1.46,95%CI[1.22 - 1.74],p < 0.001)。母亲安全的重要性降低了女性选择VBAC的几率(OR = 0.74,95%CI[0.60 - 0.90],p = 0.003),而产后更直接与婴儿建立亲密关系的动机增加了足月时偏好VBAC的几率(OR = 1.25,95%CI[1.06 - 1.46],p = 0.007)。
发现医护人员关于剖宫产术后分娩方式的建议、女性孕期第三个月的偏好以及孕期助产护理是足月时偏好VBAC的最重要预测因素。这些结果表明,产前助产护理可能是促进女性偏好VBAC的关键因素。
对分娩方式犹豫不决的有剖宫产史女性可能会从获得助产支持中受益。