Ionescu Dawn F, Niciu Mark J, Richards Erica M, Zarate Carlos A
Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2014;16(3). doi: 10.4088/PCC.13r01621. Epub 2014 May 29.
To review the pharmacologic treatment of dimensionally defined anxious depression.
English-language, adult human research articles published between 1949 and February 2013 were identified via PUBMED and EMBASE. The search term was treatment of anxious depression.
We identified and reviewed 304 original articles. Of these, 31 studies of patients with anxious depression, who were treated with an antidepressant or antipsychotic, are included in this review.
All studies explicitly used a dimensional definition of anxious depression. All patients were treated with either antidepressants or antipsychotic medications.
Of the 31 relevant psychopharmacologic studies identified, 7 examined patients receiving only 1 medication, 2 studied cotherapeutic strategies, 1 examined antipsychotic augmentation, and 21 compared multiple medications. Eleven were pooled analyses from several studies. All studies were of adults (18-92 years old). The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Anxiety/Somatization Factor Score was used to define anxious depression in 71% of the studies, and 77.4% were post hoc analyses of previous datasets. Seventeen studies found selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), and/or tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) to be useful for successfully treating anxious depression. However, patients with anxious depression were less likely to experience sustained response or remission. Furthermore, baseline anxious depression puts patients at greater risk for side effect burden.
Despite achieving response with SSRIs, SNRIs, and TCAs, patients with dimensionally defined anxious depression do not maintain response or remission and often report a larger burden of side effects compared to nonanxious depressive patients, suggesting that it is a harder-to-treat subtype of major depressive disorder.
综述维度明确的焦虑性抑郁的药物治疗。
通过PUBMED和EMBASE检索1949年至2013年2月发表的英文成人人体研究文章。检索词为焦虑性抑郁的治疗。
我们识别并综述了304篇原创文章。其中,本综述纳入了31项关于焦虑性抑郁患者接受抗抑郁药或抗精神病药治疗的研究。
所有研究均明确使用了焦虑性抑郁的维度定义。所有患者均接受抗抑郁药或抗精神病药治疗。
在识别出的31项相关精神药理学研究中,7项研究了仅接受1种药物治疗的患者,2项研究了联合治疗策略,1项研究了抗精神病药增效治疗,21项比较了多种药物。11项是多项研究的汇总分析。所有研究均针对成年人(18 - 92岁)。71%的研究使用汉密尔顿抑郁量表焦虑/躯体化因子评分来定义焦虑性抑郁,77.4%是对先前数据集的事后分析。17项研究发现选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)、5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRI)和/或三环类抗抑郁药(TCA)对成功治疗焦虑性抑郁有用。然而,焦虑性抑郁患者持续缓解或病情缓解的可能性较小。此外,基线焦虑性抑郁使患者出现副作用负担的风险更高。
尽管使用SSRI、SNRI和TCA可取得疗效,但维度明确的焦虑性抑郁患者与非焦虑性抑郁患者相比,不能维持缓解状态,且常报告有更大的副作用负担,这表明它是重度抑郁症中较难治疗的亚型。