Tollefson G D, Holman S L, Sayler M E, Potvin J H
Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Ind. 46285.
J Clin Psychiatry. 1994 Feb;55(2):50-9.
The presence or absence of anxiety has traditionally determined choice of an antidepressant ("activating" or "sedating"); however, there is little scientific support for the construct. We conducted a meta-analysis to determine whether comorbid anxiety affected efficacy or predisposed patients to specific adverse events.
Data were evaluated from 19 randomized, double-blind clinical trials comparing fluoxetine with placebo or a tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) or both in 3,183 patients with major depression (Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel, Mantel-Haenszel incidence difference, analysis of variance, and Pearson's chi-square methods). On the basis of the anxiety/somatization factor within the 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D21), patients were characterized as anxious (score > or = 7) or nonanxious (score < 7).
Fluoxetine was significantly (p < or = .05) more effective than placebo in treating both anxious and nonanxious major depression (mean improvement in HAM-D21 total score, 11.0 versus 8.1 and 8.1 versus 5.5, respectively). Fluoxetine was also statistically significantly more effective than placebo in reducing the HAM-D21 anxiety/somatization factor score (anxious, all patients). The efficacy of fluoxetine and TCAs was comparable (all measures, all groups). Discontinuations for adverse events were statistically significantly higher with fluoxetine than placebo (anxious, 15.2% versus 3.8%; nonanxious, 13.2% versus 6.7%) and with TCAs than fluoxetine (anxious, 28.9% versus 15.5%; nonanxious, 34.1% versus 19.0%). Among events suggestive of "activation" or "sedation," incidence rates ranged from 0.0% to 32.9%; discontinuation rates were low (0.0% to 4.1%), except for somnolence with TCAs (9.4% to 13.2%).
Anxiety in major depression does not appear to affect response to an antidepressant. Therefore, antidepressant selection should be determined by an agent's overall risk:benefit ratio, not the presence or absence of anxiety.
传统上,焦虑的存在与否决定了抗抑郁药的选择(“激活型”或“镇静型”);然而,这一概念几乎没有科学依据。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以确定共病焦虑是否会影响疗效或使患者易发生特定不良事件。
对19项随机、双盲临床试验的数据进行评估,这些试验在3183例重度抑郁症患者中比较了氟西汀与安慰剂或三环类抗抑郁药(TCA)或两者( Cochr an-Mantel-Haenszel法、Mantel-Haenszel发病率差异法、方差分析法和Pearson卡方检验法)。根据21项汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAM-D21)中的焦虑/躯体化因子,将患者分为焦虑组(得分≥7)或非焦虑组(得分<7)。
在治疗焦虑和非焦虑的重度抑郁症方面,氟西汀比安慰剂显著更有效(p≤0.05)(HAM-D21总分的平均改善分别为11.0对8.1和8.1对5.5)。在降低HAM-D21焦虑/躯体化因子得分方面,氟西汀也比安慰剂在统计学上显著更有效(焦虑组,所有患者)。氟西汀和TCA的疗效相当(所有测量指标,所有组)。因不良事件停药的比例,氟西汀比安慰剂在统计学上显著更高(焦虑组,15.2%对3.8%;非焦虑组,13.2%对6.7%),TCA比氟西汀更高(焦虑组,28.9%对15.5%;非焦虑组,34.1%对19.0%)。在提示“激活”或“镇静”的事件中,发生率从0.0%到32.9%不等;停药率较低(0.0%到4.1%),三环类抗抑郁药导致的嗜睡除外(9.4%到13.2%)。
重度抑郁症中的焦虑似乎不影响对抗抑郁药的反应。因此,抗抑郁药的选择应根据药物的总体风险效益比来决定,而不是焦虑的存在与否。