• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于开放性腹部手术后疼痛管理的舒芬太尼舌下片系统:一项随机、安慰剂对照研究。

Sufentanil sublingual tablet system for the management of postoperative pain following open abdominal surgery: a randomized, placebo-controlled study.

作者信息

Ringold Forrest G, Minkowitz Harold S, Gan Tong Joo, Aqua Keith A, Chiang Yu-Kun, Evashenk Mark A, Palmer Pamela P

机构信息

From the *Mobile Infirmary Medical Center, Mobile, AL; †Memorial Hermann-Memorial City Medical Center, Houston, TX; ‡Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; §Visions Clinical Research, Boyton Beach, FL; ║Essence Sciences, San Jose, CA; and **AcelRx Pharmaceuticals, Redwood City, CA.

出版信息

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jan-Feb;40(1):22-30. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000152.

DOI:10.1097/AAP.0000000000000152
PMID:25318408
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4272222/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of a sufentanil sublingual tablet system (SSTS) for the management of postoperative pain following open abdominal surgery.

METHODS

At 13 hospital sites in the United States, patients following surgery with pain intensity of greater than 4 on an 11-point numerical rating scale were randomized to receive SSTS dispensing a 15-μg sufentanil tablet sublingually with a 20-minute lockout or an identical system dispensing a placebo tablet sublingually. Pain intensity scores were recorded at baseline and for up to 72 hours after starting study drug. The primary end point was time-weighted summed pain intensity difference (SPID) over 48 hours. Secondary end points included SPID and total pain relief (TOTPAR) for up to 72 hours and patient and health care provider global assessments of the method of pain control.

RESULTS

Summed pain intensity difference over 48 hours was significantly higher in the SSTS group than in the placebo group (least squares mean [SEM], 105.60 [10.14] vs 55.58 [13.11]; P = 0.001). Mean SPID and TOTPAR scores were significantly higher in the SSTS group at all time points from 1 hour (SPID) or 2 hours (TOTPAR) until 72 hours (P < 0.05). In the SSTS group, patient global assessment and health care provider global assessment ratings of good or excellent were greater than placebo at all time points (P < 0.01). Safety parameters, including adverse events and vital signs, were similar for SSTS and placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that SSTS is effective and safe for the management of postoperative pain in patients following open abdominal surgery.

摘要

背景与目的

本研究评估了舒芬太尼舌下片系统(SSTS)用于开放性腹部手术后疼痛管理的有效性和安全性。

方法

在美国的13个医院站点,将手术疼痛强度在11分数字评分量表上大于4分的患者随机分组,分别接受舌下含服15μg舒芬太尼片且锁定时间为20分钟的SSTS,或接受舌下含服安慰剂片的相同系统。在基线以及开始研究药物后长达72小时记录疼痛强度评分。主要终点是48小时内的时间加权疼痛强度总和差值(SPID)。次要终点包括长达72小时的SPID和完全缓解疼痛(TOTPAR),以及患者和医护人员对疼痛控制方法的总体评估。

结果

SSTS组48小时内的疼痛强度总和差值显著高于安慰剂组(最小二乘均值[SEM],105.60[10.14]对55.58[13.11];P = 0.001)。从1小时(SPID)或2小时(TOTPAR)直至72小时的所有时间点,SSTS组的平均SPID和TOTPAR评分均显著更高(P < 0.05)。在SSTS组中,所有时间点患者总体评估和医护人员总体评估为良好或优秀的比例均高于安慰剂组(P < 0.01)。包括不良事件和生命体征在内的安全性参数,SSTS组和安慰剂组相似。

结论

这些结果表明,SSTS用于开放性腹部手术后患者的疼痛管理有效且安全。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/061e/4272222/8337fa0f7665/aap-40-22-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/061e/4272222/c4a90070b043/aap-40-22-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/061e/4272222/0d82cdb93464/aap-40-22-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/061e/4272222/fd56568e7159/aap-40-22-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/061e/4272222/5a0a2eaf16a0/aap-40-22-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/061e/4272222/8337fa0f7665/aap-40-22-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/061e/4272222/c4a90070b043/aap-40-22-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/061e/4272222/0d82cdb93464/aap-40-22-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/061e/4272222/fd56568e7159/aap-40-22-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/061e/4272222/5a0a2eaf16a0/aap-40-22-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/061e/4272222/8337fa0f7665/aap-40-22-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Sufentanil sublingual tablet system for the management of postoperative pain following open abdominal surgery: a randomized, placebo-controlled study.用于开放性腹部手术后疼痛管理的舒芬太尼舌下片系统:一项随机、安慰剂对照研究。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jan-Feb;40(1):22-30. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000152.
2
Sufentanil Sublingual Tablet 30 mcg for the Management of Pain Following Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase-3 Study.用于腹部手术后疼痛管理的30微克舒芬太尼舌下片:一项随机、安慰剂对照的3期研究。
Pain Pract. 2017 Sep;17(7):848-858. doi: 10.1111/papr.12531. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
3
Sufentanil Sublingual Tablet System for the Management of Postoperative Pain after Knee or Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study.舒芬太尼舌下片系统用于膝关节或髋关节置换术后的疼痛管理:一项随机、安慰剂对照研究。
Anesthesiology. 2015 Aug;123(2):434-43. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000746.
4
Pharmacokinetics of sublingual sufentanil tablets and efficacy and safety in the management of postoperative pain.舌下含服舒芬太尼片剂的药代动力学及其在术后疼痛管理中的疗效和安全性。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Mar-Apr;38(2):131-9. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3182791157.
5
Sufentanil sublingual tablet system vs. intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with morphine for postoperative pain control: a randomized, active-comparator trial.舒芬太尼舌下片系统与静脉注射吗啡患者自控镇痛用于术后疼痛控制的比较:一项随机、活性对照试验。
Pain Pract. 2014 Nov;14(8):679-88. doi: 10.1111/papr.12238. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
6
Real-world use of the sufentanil sublingual tablet system for patient-controlled management of acute postoperative pain: a prospective noninterventional study.舒芬太尼舌下片系统用于患者自控管理急性术后疼痛的真实世界应用:一项前瞻性非干预性研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2020 Feb;36(2):277-284. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1681133. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
7
Sublingual sufentanil tablet system for postoperative analgesia after gynecological surgery.经阴道给药舒芬太尼术后镇痛系统用于妇科手术后。
Minerva Med. 2019 Jun;110(3):209-215. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4806.19.05992-5.
8
Sublingual, transdermal and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for acute post-operative pain: systematic literature review and mixed treatment comparison.舌下、经皮及静脉自控镇痛用于急性术后疼痛:系统文献综述与混合治疗比较
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 May;33(5):899-910. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1294559. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
9
A review of sufentanil and the sufentanil sublingual tablet system for acute moderate to severe pain.舒芬太尼及舒芬太尼舌下片系统用于急性中重度疼痛的综述。
Pain Manag. 2015;5(4):237-50. doi: 10.2217/pmt.15.22. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
10
Pharmacokinetic properties of single- and repeated-dose sufentanil sublingual tablets in healthy volunteers.健康志愿者单次及重复给药舒芬太尼舌下片的药代动力学特性。
Clin Ther. 2015 Jan 1;37(1):145-55. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.11.001. Epub 2014 Dec 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of 4-hydroxy-2-methyl-N-(5-methyl-2-thiazolyl)-2H-1, 2-benzothiazin-3-carboxamide 1,1-dioxide, a rapid-acting meloxicam formulation, for analgesia after orthopaedic surgery under general anaesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.4-羟基-2-甲基-N-(5-甲基-2-噻唑基)-2H-1,2-苯并噻嗪-3-甲酰胺 1,1-二氧化物(一种快速起效的美洛昔康制剂)用于全身麻醉下骨科手术后镇痛的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验。
Inflammopharmacology. 2024 Dec;32(6):3799-3808. doi: 10.1007/s10787-024-01575-z. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
2
Evolution of Patient-Controlled Analgesia: From Intravenous to Sublingual Treatment.患者自控镇痛的演变:从静脉给药到舌下给药治疗
Hosp Pharm. 2016 Mar;51(3):214-229. doi: 10.1310/hpj5103-214. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Pharmacokinetics of sublingual sufentanil tablets and efficacy and safety in the management of postoperative pain.舌下含服舒芬太尼片剂的药代动力学及其在术后疼痛管理中的疗效和安全性。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Mar-Apr;38(2):131-9. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3182791157.
2
Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters.外周静脉导管的临床指征性更换与常规更换
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17(3):CD007798. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007798.pub2.
3
Development and validation of a new instrument to evaluate the ease of use of patient-controlled analgesic modalities for postoperative patients.
Sufentanil Sublingual Tablet System vs. Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia with Morphine: Postoperative Pain Control and Its Impact in Quality of Recovery.
舒芬太尼舌下片系统与静脉注射吗啡患者自控镇痛的比较:术后疼痛控制及其对恢复质量的影响。
Cureus. 2023 Oct 19;15(10):e47302. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47302. eCollection 2023 Oct.
4
Preemptive QP001, a fast-acting meloxicam formulation, provides analgesia and reduces opioid consumption following abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial.快速起效美洛昔康 QP001 用于腹部手术后镇痛:一项随机对照试验
Inflammopharmacology. 2023 Oct;31(5):2401-2410. doi: 10.1007/s10787-023-01322-w. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
5
Analgesic Modalities in Patients Undergoing Open Pancreatoduodenectomy-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.接受开放性胰十二指肠切除术患者的镇痛方式——一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 14;12(14):4682. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144682.
6
Sublingual Sufentanil versus Standard-of-Care (Patient-Controlled Analgesia with Epidural Ropivacaine/Sufentanil or Intravenous Morphine) for Postoperative Pain Following Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Randomized Trial.胰十二指肠切除术后疼痛的舌下含服舒芬太尼与标准治疗(硬膜外罗哌卡因/舒芬太尼患者自控镇痛或静脉注射吗啡)的随机对照试验
J Pain Res. 2022 Jun 22;15:1775-1786. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S363545. eCollection 2022.
7
Safety and Efficacy of Perioperative Intravenous Meloxicam for Moderate-to-Severe Pain Management in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial.静脉注射美洛昔康用于全膝关节置换术围手术期中重度疼痛管理的安全性和有效性:一项随机临床试验。
Pain Med. 2021 Jun 4;22(6):1261-1271. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab016.
8
Sufentanil sublingual tablet system versus oral oxycodone for management of postoperative pain in enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled study.舒芬太尼舌下片系统与口服羟考酮用于全膝关节置换术术后加速康复途径中术后疼痛管理的随机对照研究。
J Exp Orthop. 2020 Nov 20;7(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s40634-020-00306-x.
9
Sufentanil Sublingual for Acute Post-Operative Pain: A Systematic Literature Review Focused on Pain Intensity, Adverse Events, and Patient Satisfaction.用于急性术后疼痛的舌下含服舒芬太尼:一项聚焦于疼痛强度、不良事件和患者满意度的系统文献综述
Pain Ther. 2020 Jun;9(1):217-230. doi: 10.1007/s40122-020-00166-4. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
10
Meta-analysis of epidural analgesia in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy.硬膜外镇痛在胰十二指肠切除术患者中的荟萃分析。
BJS Open. 2019 Apr 29;3(5):559-571. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50171. eCollection 2019 Oct.
开发和验证一种新的工具,用于评估术后患者使用患者自控镇痛模式的易用性。
J Med Econ. 2010 Mar;13(1):42-54. doi: 10.3111/13696990903484637.
4
Medication errors involving patient-controlled analgesia.涉及患者自控镇痛的用药错误。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008 Mar 1;65(5):429-40. doi: 10.2146/ajhp070194.
5
System-related events and analgesic gaps during postoperative pain management with the fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system and morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia.使用芬太尼离子导入透皮系统和吗啡静脉自控镇痛进行术后疼痛管理期间的系统相关事件和镇痛间隙。
Anesth Analg. 2007 Nov;105(5):1437-41, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000281442.36582.81.
6
Ease of care with patient controlled analgesia systems: questionnaire development and validation.患者自控镇痛系统的护理便利性:问卷的编制与验证
J Adv Nurs. 2007 Sep;59(5):530-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04284.x.
7
Patient controlled opioid analgesia versus conventional opioid analgesia for postoperative pain.患者自控阿片类镇痛与传统阿片类镇痛用于术后疼痛的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18(4):CD003348. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003348.pub2.
8
Validation of a verbally administered numerical rating scale of acute pain for use in the emergency department.用于急诊科的急性疼痛口头数字评定量表的验证
Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Apr;10(4):390-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb01355.x.
9
The transfer half-life of morphine-6-glucuronide from plasma to effect site assessed by pupil size measurement in healthy volunteers.通过测量健康志愿者的瞳孔大小评估吗啡 - 6 - 葡萄糖醛酸苷从血浆到作用部位的转运半衰期。
Anesthesiology. 2001 Dec;95(6):1329-38. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200112000-00009.
10
Postoperative patient-controlled analgesia: meta-analyses of initial randomized control trials.术后患者自控镇痛:初始随机对照试验的荟萃分析
J Clin Anesth. 1993 May-Jun;5(3):182-93. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(93)90013-5.