• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用芬太尼离子导入透皮系统和吗啡静脉自控镇痛进行术后疼痛管理期间的系统相关事件和镇痛间隙。

System-related events and analgesic gaps during postoperative pain management with the fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system and morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia.

作者信息

Panchal Sunil J, Damaraju C V, Nelson Winnie W, Hewitt David J, Schein Jeff R

机构信息

Coalition for Pain Education Foundation, Tampa, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2007 Nov;105(5):1437-41, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000281442.36582.81.

DOI:10.1213/01.ane.0000281442.36582.81
PMID:17959979
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Analgesic gaps (interruptions in analgesic delivery) contribute to ineffective postoperative pain management. In this analysis, we evaluated the incidence of analgesic gaps resulting from system-related events (SREs) for patients using the fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system (ITS), a noninvasive patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) system, or morphine IV PCA for postoperative pain management.

METHODS

Data were pooled from two open-label, randomized, active-controlled trials that evaluated the efficacy and safety of fentanyl ITS and morphine IV PCA after total hip replacement, abdominal, or pelvic surgery. The incidence and duration of analgesic gaps resulting from SREs were assessed, along with SRE resolution times.

RESULTS

A total of 1305 patients received fentanyl ITS (n = 647) or morphine IV PCA (n = 658). Fentanyl ITS was associated with a significantly lower incidence of analgesic gaps per 100 patients compared with morphine IV PCA (5.87 vs 12.01, respectively; P < 0.001). Compared with patients receiving morphine IV PCA, patients receiving fentanyl ITS had both a numerically lower median total analgesic gap time (15.0 min vs 20.0 min) and a numerically lower median total SRE resolution time (11.0 min vs 20.0 min). Most fentanyl ITS SREs were resolved by applying a new system, whereas many different SRE resolution methods were used for morphine IV PCA.

CONCLUSIONS

Fentanyl ITS was associated with a significantly lower incidence of analgesic gaps relative to morphine IV PCA. Fentanyl ITS may provide patients with fewer interruptions and more continuous analgesic delivery.

摘要

背景

镇痛间隙(镇痛给药中断)会导致术后疼痛管理效果不佳。在本分析中,我们评估了使用芬太尼离子导入透皮系统(ITS)、一种无创患者自控镇痛(PCA)系统或吗啡静脉PCA进行术后疼痛管理的患者中,由系统相关事件(SREs)导致的镇痛间隙发生率。

方法

数据汇总自两项开放标签、随机、活性对照试验,这些试验评估了芬太尼ITS和吗啡静脉PCA在全髋关节置换术、腹部或盆腔手术后的疗效和安全性。评估了由SREs导致的镇痛间隙的发生率和持续时间,以及SRE解决时间。

结果

共有1305例患者接受了芬太尼ITS(n = 647)或吗啡静脉PCA(n = 658)。与吗啡静脉PCA相比,芬太尼ITS每100例患者的镇痛间隙发生率显著更低(分别为5.87和12.01;P < 0.001)。与接受吗啡静脉PCA的患者相比,接受芬太尼ITS的患者的总镇痛间隙时间中位数在数值上更低(15.0分钟对20.0分钟),总SRE解决时间中位数在数值上也更低(11.0分钟对20.0分钟)。大多数芬太尼ITS的SREs通过应用新系统得以解决,而吗啡静脉PCA则使用了许多不同的SRE解决方法。

结论

相对于吗啡静脉PCA,芬太尼ITS的镇痛间隙发生率显著更低。芬太尼ITS可能为患者提供更少的中断和更持续的镇痛给药。

相似文献

1
System-related events and analgesic gaps during postoperative pain management with the fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system and morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia.使用芬太尼离子导入透皮系统和吗啡静脉自控镇痛进行术后疼痛管理期间的系统相关事件和镇痛间隙。
Anesth Analg. 2007 Nov;105(5):1437-41, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000281442.36582.81.
2
Efficacy and safety of the fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system (ITS) and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) with morphine for pain management following abdominal or pelvic surgery.芬太尼离子导入透皮系统(ITS)与静脉自控镇痛(IV PCA)联合吗啡用于腹部或盆腔手术后疼痛管理的疗效和安全性。
Pain Med. 2007 Nov-Dec;8(8):657-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2006.00257.x.
3
The safety and efficacy of fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system compared with morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain management: an analysis of pooled data from three randomized, active-controlled clinical studies.芬太尼离子导入透皮系统与吗啡静脉自控镇痛用于术后疼痛管理的安全性和有效性:三项随机、活性对照临床研究的汇总数据分析
Anesth Analg. 2007 Nov;105(5):1428-36, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000281913.28623.fd.
4
Patients' assessment of the convenience of fentanyl HCl iontophoretic transdermal system (ITS) versus morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) in the management of postoperative pain after major surgery.患者对盐酸芬太尼离子导入透皮系统(ITS)与吗啡静脉自控镇痛(IV PCA)用于大手术后疼痛管理的便利性评估。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2009 Sep;10(3):124-33. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2007.09.001. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
5
Comparison of postoperative pain management using two patient-controlled analgesia methods: nursing perspective.两种患者自控镇痛方法用于术后疼痛管理的比较:护理视角
J Adv Nurs. 2009 Jul;65(7):1370-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.04991.x. Epub 2009 May 9.
6
Efficacy and safety of fentanyl HCl iontophoretic transdermal system compared with morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain management for patient subgroups.芬太尼 HCl 离子电渗经皮贴剂与吗啡静脉患者自控镇痛用于术后疼痛管理的疗效和安全性:患者亚组比较。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 May;27(5):433-40. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283349d82.
7
Intrathecal morphine combined with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia is an effective and safe method for immediate postoperative pain control in live liver donors.鞘内注射吗啡联合静脉自控镇痛是活体肝供者术后即刻疼痛控制的一种有效且安全的方法。
Liver Transpl. 2009 Apr;15(4):381-9. doi: 10.1002/lt.21625.
8
Fentanyl HCl iontophoretic transdermal system versus intravenous morphine pump after gynecologic surgery.妇科手术后芬太尼盐酸盐离子导入透皮系统与静脉注射吗啡泵的比较
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2007 Sep;276(3):251-8. doi: 10.1007/s00404-007-0339-z. Epub 2007 Mar 22.
9
Physical therapists' perceptions of ease of care in patients receiving 2 forms of analgesia after total hip arthroplasty.物理治疗师对全髋关节置换术后接受 2 种镇痛形式的患者的护理便利性的看法。
Phys Ther. 2010 May;90(5):707-13. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080323. Epub 2010 Mar 18.
10
An iontophoretic fentanyl patient-activated analgesic delivery system for postoperative pain: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.一种用于术后疼痛的离子电渗芬太尼患者自控镇痛给药系统:一项双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Anesth Analg. 2006 Jan;102(1):188-94. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000183649.58483.77.

引用本文的文献

1
Sublingual sufentanil for patient-controlled analgesia during labor induction for pregnancy termination: an effective and well-tolerated approach.舌下含服舒芬太尼用于妊娠终止引产时的患者自控镇痛:一种有效且耐受性良好的方法。
J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2024 Jul 8;4(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s44158-024-00177-z.
2
Evolution of Patient-Controlled Analgesia: From Intravenous to Sublingual Treatment.患者自控镇痛的演变:从静脉给药到舌下给药治疗
Hosp Pharm. 2016 Mar;51(3):214-229. doi: 10.1310/hpj5103-214. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
3
Sublingual Sufentanil Tablet System (SSTS-Zalviso) for Postoperative Analgesia after Orthopedic Surgery: A Retrospective Study.
舌下含服舒芬太尼片剂系统(SSTS-Zalviso)用于骨科手术后的镇痛:一项回顾性研究。
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 21;11(22):6864. doi: 10.3390/jcm11226864.
4
Medication errors involving intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: results from the 2005-2015 MEDMARX database.涉及静脉自控镇痛的用药差错:来自2005 - 2015年MEDMARX数据库的结果
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2018 Apr 26;9(8):389-404. doi: 10.1177/2042098618773013. eCollection 2018 Aug.
5
Sublingual sufentanil tablet system Zalviso® for postoperative analgesia after knee replacement in fast track surgery: a pilot observational study.用于快速康复外科膝关节置换术后镇痛的舌下含服舒芬太尼片剂系统Zalviso®:一项前瞻性观察研究。
J Exp Orthop. 2018 Mar 20;5(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40634-018-0123-y.
6
Newer drug delivery systems in anesthesia.麻醉领域的新型药物递送系统。
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Apr-Jun;33(2):157-163. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_63_16.
7
Fentanyl Formulations in the Management of Pain: An Update.芬太尼制剂在疼痛管理中的应用:更新。
Drugs. 2017 May;77(7):747-763. doi: 10.1007/s40265-017-0727-z.
8
Sublingual Sufentanil: A Review in Acute Postoperative Pain.舌下舒芬太尼:急性术后疼痛的综述。
Drugs. 2016 Apr;76(6):719-29. doi: 10.1007/s40265-016-0571-6.
9
Sufentanil sublingual tablet system for the management of postoperative pain following open abdominal surgery: a randomized, placebo-controlled study.用于开放性腹部手术后疼痛管理的舒芬太尼舌下片系统:一项随机、安慰剂对照研究。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jan-Feb;40(1):22-30. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000152.
10
Sufentanil sublingual tablet system vs. intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with morphine for postoperative pain control: a randomized, active-comparator trial.舒芬太尼舌下片系统与静脉注射吗啡患者自控镇痛用于术后疼痛控制的比较:一项随机、活性对照试验。
Pain Pract. 2014 Nov;14(8):679-88. doi: 10.1111/papr.12238. Epub 2014 Aug 25.