Kurhanewicz Nicole, McIntosh-Kastrinsky Rachel, Tong Haiyan, Walsh Leon, Farraj Aimen K, Hazari Mehdi S
Curriculum in Toxicology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Part Fibre Toxicol. 2014 Oct 16;11:54. doi: 10.1186/s12989-014-0054-4.
Studies have shown a relationship between air pollution and increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Due to the complexity of ambient air pollution composition, recent studies have examined the effects of co-exposure, particularly particulate matter (PM) and gas, to determine whether pollutant interactions alter (e.g. synergistically, antagonistically) the health response. This study examines the independent effects of fine (FCAPs) and ultrafine (UFCAPs) concentrated ambient particles on cardiac function, and determine the impact of ozone (O₃) co-exposure on the response. We hypothesized that UFCAPs would cause greater decrement in mechanical function and electrical dysfunction than FCAPs, and that O₃ co-exposure would enhance the effects of both particle-types.
Conscious/unrestrained radiotelemetered mice were exposed once whole-body to either 190 μg/m³ FCAPs or 140 μg/m³ UFCAPs with/without 0.3 ppm O₃; separate groups were exposed to either filtered air (FA) or O₃ alone. Heart rate (HR) and electrocardiogram (ECG) were recorded continuously before, during and after exposure, and cardiac mechanical function was assessed using a Langendorff perfusion preparation 24 hrs post-exposure.
FCAPs alone caused a significant decrease in baseline left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP) and contractility, whereas UFCAPs did not; neither FCAPs nor UFCAPs alone caused any ECG changes. O₃ co-exposure with FCAPs caused a significant decrease in heart rate variability when compared to FA but also blocked the decrement in cardiac function. On the other hand, O₃ co-exposure with UFCAPs significantly increased QRS-interval, QTc and non-conducted P-wave arrhythmias, and decreased LVDP, rate of contractility and relaxation when compared to controls.
These data suggest that particle size and gaseous interactions may play a role in cardiac function decrements one day after exposure. Although FCAPs + O₃ only altered autonomic balance, UFCAPs + O₃ appeared to be more serious by increasing cardiac arrhythmias and causing mechanical decrements. As such, O₃ appears to interact differently with FCAPs and UFCAPs, resulting in varied cardiac changes, which suggests that the cardiovascular effects of particle-gas co-exposures are not simply additive or even generalizable. Additionally, the mode of toxicity underlying this effect may be subtle given none of the exposures described here impaired post-ischemia recovery.
研究表明空气污染与心血管疾病发病率和死亡率增加之间存在关联。由于环境空气污染成分复杂,近期研究已考察了共同暴露的影响,尤其是颗粒物(PM)和气体,以确定污染物相互作用是否会改变(如协同、拮抗)健康反应。本研究考察了细颗粒物(FCAPs)和超细颗粒物(UFCAPs)对心脏功能的独立影响,并确定臭氧(O₃)共同暴露对该反应的影响。我们假设UFCAPs比FCAPs会导致更大程度的机械功能下降和电功能障碍,并且O₃共同暴露会增强这两种颗粒物类型的影响。
对清醒/不受束缚的无线电遥测小鼠进行全身一次性暴露,使其暴露于190μg/m³ FCAPs或140μg/m³ UFCAPs,同时伴有或不伴有0.3ppm O₃;将单独的组暴露于过滤空气(FA)或仅O₃中。在暴露前、暴露期间和暴露后连续记录心率(HR)和心电图(ECG),并在暴露后24小时使用Langendorff灌注制剂评估心脏机械功能。
单独的FCAPs导致基线左心室舒张末压(LVDP)和收缩性显著降低,而UFCAPs则没有;单独的FCAPs和UFCAPs均未引起任何ECG变化。与FA相比,FCAPs与O₃共同暴露导致心率变异性显著降低,但也阻止了心脏功能的下降。另一方面,与对照组相比,UFCAPs与O₃共同暴露显著增加了QRS间期、QTc和未传导P波心律失常,并降低了LVDP、收缩率和舒张率。
这些数据表明,颗粒大小和气态相互作用可能在暴露后一天的心脏功能下降中起作用。虽然FCAPs + O₃仅改变了自主神经平衡,但UFCAPs + O₃似乎更严重,因为它增加了心律失常并导致机械功能下降。因此,O₃与FCAPs和UFCAPs的相互作用似乎不同,导致了不同的心脏变化,这表明颗粒 - 气体共同暴露对心血管的影响并非简单的相加,甚至也不具有普遍性。此外,鉴于此处描述的任何暴露均未损害缺血后恢复,这种效应背后的毒性模式可能很微妙。