Department of Pharmacology (K.L.W., H.Z., D.E.N., B.L.R.), Department of Neurology (J.E.R., J.F.D., C.J.M.), and Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies (J.E.R., C.J.M.), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; and Department of BioMolecular Sciences, Division of Pharmacognosy, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi (P.R.P., J.K.Z.).
Department of Pharmacology (K.L.W., H.Z., D.E.N., B.L.R.), Department of Neurology (J.E.R., J.F.D., C.J.M.), and Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies (J.E.R., C.J.M.), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; and Department of BioMolecular Sciences, Division of Pharmacognosy, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi (P.R.P., J.K.Z.)
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2015 Jan;352(1):98-109. doi: 10.1124/jpet.114.216820. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
The hypothesis that functionally selective G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) agonists may have enhanced therapeutic benefits has revitalized interest for many GPCR targets. In particular, although κ-opioid receptor (KOR) agonists are analgesic with a low risk of dependence and abuse, their use is limited by a propensity to induce sedation, motor incoordination, hallucinations, and dysphoria-like states. Several laboratories have produced a body of work suggesting that G protein-biased KOR agonists might be analgesic with fewer side effects. Although that has been an intriguing hypothesis, suitable KOR-selective and G protein-biased agonists have not been available to test this idea. Here we provide data using a G protein-biased agonist, RB-64 (22-thiocyanatosalvinorin A), which suggests that KOR-mediated G protein signaling induces analgesia and aversion, whereas β-arrestin-2 signaling may be associated with motor incoordination. Additionally, unlike unbiased KOR agonists, the G protein-biased ligand RB-64 does not induce sedation and does not have anhedonia-like actions, suggesting that a mechanism other than G protein signaling mediates these effects. Our findings provide the first evidence for a highly selective and G protein-biased tool compound for which many, but not all, of the negative side effects of KOR agonists can be minimized by creating G protein-biased KOR agonists.
功能选择性 G 蛋白偶联受体(GPCR)激动剂可能具有增强治疗效果的假设,重新激发了许多 GPCR 靶点的研究兴趣。特别是,κ-阿片受体(KOR)激动剂具有镇痛作用,且成瘾和滥用风险低,但由于易引起镇静、运动不协调、幻觉和类似抑郁的状态,其应用受到限制。许多实验室已经做了大量工作,表明 G 蛋白偏向性 KOR 激动剂可能具有较少的副作用和更好的镇痛效果。尽管这是一个有趣的假设,但还没有合适的 KOR 选择性和 G 蛋白偏向性激动剂来验证这一想法。在这里,我们使用 G 蛋白偏向性激动剂 RB-64(22-硫氰酸萨尔文林 A)提供了数据,该数据表明 KOR 介导的 G 蛋白信号转导可引起镇痛和厌恶,而β-arrestin-2 信号可能与运动不协调有关。此外,与非偏向性 KOR 激动剂不同,G 蛋白偏向性配体 RB-64 不会引起镇静,也不会产生类似快感缺失的作用,这表明介导这些作用的机制不是 G 蛋白信号转导。我们的发现为高度选择性和 G 蛋白偏向性的工具化合物提供了首个证据,通过创建 G 蛋白偏向性 KOR 激动剂,可以最大限度地减少 KOR 激动剂的许多(但不是全部)负面副作用。