• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无结倒刺缝线在妇科手术中的作用:系统评价与Meta分析

The Role of Knotless Barbed Suture in Gynecologic Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Iavazzo Christos, Mamais Ioannis, Gkegkes Ioannis D

机构信息

IASO Maternity Hospital, Athens, Greece

University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Surg Innov. 2015 Oct;22(5):528-39. doi: 10.1177/1553350614554235. Epub 2014 Oct 15.

DOI:10.1177/1553350614554235
PMID:25320107
Abstract

Knotless barbed sutures are an innovative suturing material that can facilitate laparoendoscopic operations. The purpose of this study is to examine the available evidence on the application of barbed sutures on both laparoscopic and robotic operations in the field of gynecologic surgery. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases. In total, 1991 patients were included in the study. The duration of closure with knotless suture ranged from 3.9 to 13 minutes, which was less than the use of conventional suture in every study. The duration of suturing was significantly less in the barbed suture group during hysterectomy, the mean difference between the observed groups was 2.41 minutes per operation (95% confidence interval, 1.23-3.59) whereas in myomectomy there was no statistically significant difference between compared groups. Concerning the estimated blood loss and the presence of major bleeding in hysterectomy, no statistical difference between the 2 groups was observed, while the estimated blood loss in myomectomy was found to be statistically significant (P = .04). Regarding the dehiscence of vaginal cuff in hysterectomy, no statistically significant difference was observed (1031 patients, odds ratio = 1.63; 95% confidence interval = 0.37-7.25). The complete absence of knots, the even distribution of tissue strength along the wound, and the reduction of operation time are the main advantages of this type of sutures. Additional clinical trials of higher methodological quality are necessary to further clarify suturing advantages and postoperative outcomes of the barbed sutures.

摘要

免打结倒刺缝线是一种创新的缝合材料,可促进腹腔镜手术操作。本研究的目的是考察倒刺缝线在妇科手术领域腹腔镜和机器人手术应用方面的现有证据。我们在PubMed、Scopus和Cochrane数据库中进行了系统检索。该研究共纳入了1991例患者。使用免打结缝线的闭合时间为3.9至13分钟,在每项研究中均短于使用传统缝线的时间。在子宫切除术中,倒刺缝线组的缝合时间显著更短,观察组之间的平均差异为每次手术2.41分钟(95%置信区间,1.23 - 3.59),而在子宫肌瘤切除术中,比较组之间无统计学显著差异。关于子宫切除术中估计的失血量和大出血情况,两组之间未观察到统计学差异,而子宫肌瘤切除术中估计的失血量具有统计学显著性(P = 0.04)。关于子宫切除术中阴道断端裂开情况,未观察到统计学显著差异(1031例患者,比值比 = 1.63;95%置信区间 = 0.37 - 7.25)。这种缝线的主要优点是完全没有结、组织强度沿伤口均匀分布以及手术时间缩短。需要开展更多方法学质量更高的临床试验,以进一步阐明倒刺缝线的缝合优势和术后结局。

相似文献

1
The Role of Knotless Barbed Suture in Gynecologic Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.无结倒刺缝线在妇科手术中的作用:系统评价与Meta分析
Surg Innov. 2015 Oct;22(5):528-39. doi: 10.1177/1553350614554235. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
2
Efficacy and safety of V-Loc barbed sutures versus conventional suture techniques in gynecological surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.V-Loc 倒刺缝线与传统缝合技术在妇科手术中的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Apr;309(4):1249-1265. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07291-3. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
3
Barbed suture in minimally invasive hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.微创子宫切除术中的倒刺缝线:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Sep;292(3):489-97. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3653-x. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
4
Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications.用于预防切口疝及其他伤口并发症的剖腹手术切口闭合方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 3;11(11):CD005661. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005661.pub2.
5
Effectiveness and safety of knotless barbed sutures in cosmetic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.无痕缝合线在美容外科中的有效性和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023 Dec;87:416-429. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.10.084. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
6
Tissue adhesives for closure of surgical incisions.用于手术切口闭合的组织粘合剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12(5):CD004287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004287.pub3.
7
Knotless Barbed versus Conventional Suture for Closure of the Uterine Incision at Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.无结倒刺缝线与传统缝线用于剖宫产子宫切口缝合的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022 Jul;29(7):832-839. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2022.05.001. Epub 2022 May 7.
8
Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse.阴道顶端脱垂妇女的手术治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 26;7(7):CD012376. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012376.pub2.
9
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
10
Barbed Versus Conventional Suture for Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.脊柱手术中倒刺缝线与传统缝线的比较:系统评价与荟萃分析
World Neurosurg. 2025 Jan;193:241-255. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.117. Epub 2024 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidence and outcome characteristics of adverse event in surgery: an assessment based on systematic reviews of barbed suture.手术中不良事件的发生率及结局特征:基于倒刺缝线系统评价的评估
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02607-0.
2
Comparison of Polyglactin 910 With Barbed Sutures for Vaginal Cuff Closure Time in Patients Undergoing Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.全腹腔镜子宫切除术患者中聚乙醇酸910与倒刺缝线用于阴道残端闭合时间的比较。
Cureus. 2025 May 8;17(5):e83708. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83708. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Barbed and Non-Barbed Suture Materials for Ventral Hernia Repair: An Experimental Study.
用于腹疝修补的带倒刺和不带倒刺缝合材料:一项实验研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 May 1;14(9):3139. doi: 10.3390/jcm14093139.
4
Incidence and Prevention of Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence After Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy in Benign Conditions: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.良性疾病腹腔镜及机器人辅助子宫切除术后阴道残端裂开的发生率及预防:一项更新的系统评价和Meta分析
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Apr 1;61(4):647. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040647.
5
Assessment of a novel unidirectional mid-term absorbable barbed suture versus a competitor barbed suture for vaginal cuff closure after gynaecology surgery, study protocol of a randomized controlled trial - BARHYSTER.一项关于新型单向中期可吸收倒刺缝线与一种对照倒刺缝线用于妇科手术后阴道残端闭合的评估——随机对照试验BARHYSTER的研究方案
BMC Surg. 2025 Jan 14;25(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02700-z.
6
Efficacy and safety of V-Loc barbed sutures versus conventional suture techniques in gynecological surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.V-Loc 倒刺缝线与传统缝合技术在妇科手术中的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Apr;309(4):1249-1265. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07291-3. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
7
Early Gastric Outlet Obstruction Caused by the Free End of Barbed Sutures Following Laparoscopic Gastric Resection with Roux-en-Y Reconstruction.腹腔镜胃切除术后 Roux-en-Y 重建时,带倒刺缝线游离端导致早期胃输出道梗阻。
Am J Case Rep. 2023 Oct 9;24:e940661. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.940661.
8
The value of mesenteric closure after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a scoping review.腹腔镜右半结肠切除术系膜关闭的价值:范围综述。
BMC Surg. 2023 May 17;23(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02033-3.
9
Clinical Relevance of Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence after Minimally Invasive versus Open Hysterectomy.微创与开放子宫切除术后阴道残端裂开的临床相关性
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 20;12(8):3001. doi: 10.3390/jcm12083001.
10
Non-absorbable Barbed Sutures for Primary Fascial Closure in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair.用于腹腔镜腹疝修补术中初次筋膜缝合的不可吸收倒刺缝线
Cureus. 2022 Feb 23;14(2):e22523. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22523. eCollection 2022 Feb.