G Mahendra, Maski Preethi, K Subbappa, Babu Ramesh
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, B.G Nagara, IND.
Cureus. 2025 May 8;17(5):e83708. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83708. eCollection 2025 May.
Background Total hysterectomy is among the most performed gynecological surgeries globally, with a significant shift toward laparoscopic approaches for benign uterine conditions. While laparoscopic hysterectomy offers several benefits, such as reduced pain, shorter recovery, and fewer complications, challenges in laparoscopic suturing of the vaginal cuff remains. The introduction of barbed sutures, which eliminate the need for knotting, has been proposed as an effective alternative to traditional suturing. Methods A prospective, two-arm, randomized, single-center study was conducted at Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Karnataka, India, from May to October 2024. Sixty adult women, aged 30-75 years, scheduled for total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) due to benign uterine pathologies were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups using a pre-sealed envelope: the unidirectional barbed suture group with a triangular end stopper and a black needle or the polyglactin 910 suture group with a black needle. Primary and secondary outcomes included comparison of vault closure time, total operative time, postoperative pain (measured by the visual analog scale), intraoperative handling of sutures, and vaginal cuff-related complications. Results The barbed suture group had a significantly shorter mean vault closure time (6.94 ± 3.39 minutes vs 11.75 ± 4.59 minutes; p = 0.00002) and total operative time (102.27 ± 22.27 minutes vs 131.10 ± 24.99 minutes; p = 0.000015) as compared to the polyglactin 910 suture group. Postoperative pain levels and intraoperative handling properties of the sutures were comparable between the two groups. No vaginal cuff-related complications were observed in either group. Conclusion The barbed suture significantly reduced vault closure time and total operative time compared to the polyglactin 910 suture, suggesting that it may enhance the efficiency of laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure. However, both suture types demonstrated comparable postoperative pain and complication rates. These findings support the use of both sutures as safe and effective options for TLH, with the barbed suture offering advantages in vault closure time and overall surgical time.
全子宫切除术是全球实施最为广泛的妇科手术之一,对于良性子宫疾病的治疗,手术方式已显著转向腹腔镜手术。虽然腹腔镜子宫切除术具有诸多益处,如疼痛减轻、恢复时间缩短和并发症减少等,但阴道残端的腹腔镜缝合仍存在挑战。倒刺缝线的引入消除了打结的需要,已被提议作为传统缝合的有效替代方法。
2024年5月至10月,在印度卡纳塔克邦的阿迪昌纳吉里医学科学研究所进行了一项前瞻性、双臂、随机、单中心研究。纳入60名年龄在30 - 75岁之间、因良性子宫病变计划接受全腹腔镜子宫切除术(TLH)的成年女性。使用预先密封的信封将参与者随机分配到两组之一:带有三角形末端挡块和黑色针的单向倒刺缝线组或带有黑色针的聚乙醇酸910缝线组。主要和次要结局包括阴道穹窿闭合时间、总手术时间、术后疼痛(通过视觉模拟量表测量)、术中缝线操作以及与阴道残端相关的并发症的比较。
与聚乙醇酸910缝线组相比,倒刺缝线组的平均阴道穹窿闭合时间显著缩短(分别为6.94 ± 3.39分钟和11.75 ± 4.59分钟;p = 0.00002),总手术时间也显著缩短(分别为102.27 ± 22.27分钟和131.10 ± 24.99分钟;p = 0.000015)。两组术后疼痛水平和术中缝线操作特性相当。两组均未观察到与阴道残端相关的并发症。
与聚乙醇酸910缝线相比,倒刺缝线显著缩短了阴道穹窿闭合时间和总手术时间,表明它可能提高腹腔镜阴道残端闭合的效率。然而,两种缝线类型的术后疼痛和并发症发生率相当。这些发现支持将两种缝线都作为TLH安全有效的选择,倒刺缝线在阴道穹窿闭合时间和总体手术时间方面具有优势。