• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Ecological variation in wealth-fertility relationships in Mongolia: the 'central theoretical problem of sociobiology' not a problem after all?蒙古国财富与生育率关系中的生态变异:“社会生物学的核心理论问题”终究并非问题?
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Dec 7;281(1796):20141733. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1733.
2
Black America in the 1980s.20世纪80年代的美国黑人。
Popul Bull. 1982 Dec;37(4):1-39.
3
Association between socioeconomic status and fertility among adolescents aged 15 to 19: an analysis of the 2013/2014 Zambia Demographic Health Survey (ZDHS).青少年(15-19 岁)的社会经济地位与生育力之间的关系:对 2013/2014 年赞比亚人口健康调查(ZDHS)的分析。
Reprod Health. 2021 Sep 10;18(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01230-8.
4
Fertility decline and the changing dynamics of wealth, status and inequality.生育率下降以及财富、地位和不平等状况的动态变化。
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 May 7;282(1806):20150287. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.0287.
5
Ethnic models of fertility behaviour in Sri Lanka.斯里兰卡生育行为的种族模式。
Asia Pac Popul J. 1987 Dec;2(4):29-42.
6
[Socioeconomic aspects of fertility in an urban African setting: Abidjan].[非洲城市环境中生育的社会经济方面:阿比让]
CIRES Cah Ivoir Rech Econ Soc. 1981 Mar-Jun(28-29):3-35.
7
Analyzing the correlation between educational attainment and fertility.分析教育程度与生育率之间的相关性。
Chin J Popul Sci. 1995;7(2):135-48.
8
Determinants of fertility in urban and rural Kenya: estimates and a simulation of the impact of education policy.肯尼亚城乡地区生育的决定因素:估计及教育政策影响的模拟
Environ Plan A. 1993 Mar;25(3):371-82. doi: 10.1068/a250371.
9
Fertility differentials in rural Sierra Leone: demographic and socioeconomic effects.塞拉利昂农村地区的生育差异:人口和社会经济影响
Genus. 1991 Jul-Dec;47(3-4):171-82.
10
An economic analysis of female work participation, education, and fertility: theory and empirical evidence for the Federal Republic of Germany.女性劳动参与、教育与生育的经济分析:德意志联邦共和国的理论与实证证据
J Labor Econ. 1985 Jan;3(1 Part 2):S218-34. doi: 10.1086/298082.

引用本文的文献

1
Life Satisfaction among Older Adults in Rural and Urban Mongolia: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.蒙古国城乡老年人的生活满意度:一项横断面调查研究。
Biomed Hub. 2023 Oct 25;8(1):79-87. doi: 10.1159/000533917. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
2
Disentangling wealth effects on fertility in 64 low- and middle-income countries.解析64个低收入和中等收入国家财富对生育率的影响
Evol Hum Sci. 2020 Nov 23;2:e58. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2020.62. eCollection 2020.
3
Life-history tradeoffs in a historical population (1896-1939) undergoing rapid fertility decline: Costs of reproduction?经历快速生育率下降的历史人口(1896 - 1939年)中的生活史权衡:繁殖成本?
Evol Hum Sci. 2022 Feb 21;4. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2022.2.
4
The Reproductive Ecology of Industrial Societies, Part II : The Association between Wealth and Fertility.工业社会的生殖生态学,第二部分:财富与生育率之间的关联。
Hum Nat. 2016 Dec;27(4):445-470. doi: 10.1007/s12110-016-9272-9.
5
The Reproductive Ecology of Industrial Societies, Part I : Why Measuring Fertility Matters.工业社会的生殖生态学,第一部分:为何测量生育率至关重要。
Hum Nat. 2016 Dec;27(4):422-444. doi: 10.1007/s12110-016-9269-4.
6
Parents face quantity-quality trade-offs between reproduction and investment in offspring in Iceland.冰岛的父母在生育后代与对后代的投入之间面临着数量与质量的权衡。
R Soc Open Sci. 2016 May 18;3(5):160087. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160087. eCollection 2016 May.
7
Does Sexual Conflict between Mother and Father Lead to Fertility Decline? : A Questionnaire Survey in a Modern Developed Society.父母间的性冲突会导致生育能力下降吗?:现代发达社会中的一项问卷调查
Hum Nat. 2016 Jun;27(2):201-19. doi: 10.1007/s12110-016-9254-y.
8
Wealth, fertility and adaptive behaviour in industrial populations.工业人口中的财富、生育能力与适应性行为。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Apr 19;371(1692):20150153. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0153.
9
Fertility decline and the changing dynamics of wealth, status and inequality.生育率下降以及财富、地位和不平等状况的动态变化。
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 May 7;282(1806):20150287. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.0287.

本文引用的文献

1
Education, HIV, and Early Fertility: Experimental Evidence from Kenya.教育、艾滋病毒与早育:来自肯尼亚的实验证据
Am Econ Rev. 2015 Sep;105(9):2757-97. doi: 10.1257/aer.20121607.
2
A synthetic biosocial model of fertility transition: testing the relative contribution of embodied capital theory, changing cultural norms, and women's labor force participation.生育转变的综合生物社会模型:检验具身资本理论、不断变化的文化规范以及女性劳动力参与率的相对贡献。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2014 Jul;154(3):322-33. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.22512. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
3
Does observed fertility maximize fitness among New Mexican men? : A test of an optimality model and a new theory of parental investment in the embodied capital of offspring.新墨西哥男性的生育力是否达到了最优?:对一个最优模型和一个新的后代有形资本亲投资理论的检验。
Hum Nat. 1995 Dec;6(4):325-60. doi: 10.1007/BF02734205.
4
The life-history trade-off between fertility and child survival.生育力与儿童存活率之间的生活史权衡。
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Dec 7;279(1748):4755-64. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1635. Epub 2012 Oct 3.
5
Low fertility increases descendant socioeconomic position but reduces long-term fitness in a modern post-industrial society.低生育率会增加后代的社会经济地位,但会降低现代后工业化社会的长期适应能力。
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Nov 7;279(1746):4342-51. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1415. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
6
Fertility postponement is largely due to rising educational enrolment.生育推迟在很大程度上是由于受教育程度的提高。
Popul Stud (Camb). 2012 Nov;66(3):311-27. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2012.697569. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
7
Why do people postpone parenthood? Reasons and social policy incentives.为什么人们会推迟生育?原因和社会政策激励措施。
Hum Reprod Update. 2011 Nov-Dec;17(6):848-60. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmr026. Epub 2011 Jun 7.
8
The demographic transition: are we any closer to an evolutionary explanation?人口转变:我们是否更接近于进化解释了?
Trends Ecol Evol. 1998 Jul 1;13(7):266-70. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01357-3.
9
Parental investment and the optimization of human family size.父母投资与人类家庭规模的最优化。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Feb 12;366(1563):333-43. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0297.
10
Why do men seek status? Fitness payoffs to dominance and prestige.男性为何追求地位?支配和威望带来的健康回报。
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Jul 22;278(1715):2223-32. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2145. Epub 2010 Dec 8.

蒙古国财富与生育率关系中的生态变异:“社会生物学的核心理论问题”终究并非问题?

Ecological variation in wealth-fertility relationships in Mongolia: the 'central theoretical problem of sociobiology' not a problem after all?

作者信息

Alvergne Alexandra, Lummaa Virpi

机构信息

School of Anthropology and Museum Ethnography, Oxford University, Oxford OX2 6PE, UK Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK Harris Manchester College, Oxford OX1 3TD, UK

Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Dec 7;281(1796):20141733. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1733.

DOI:10.1098/rspb.2014.1733
PMID:25320175
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4213645/
Abstract

The negative wealth-fertility relationship brought about by market integration remains a puzzle to classic evolutionary models. Evolutionary ecologists have argued that this phenomenon results from both stronger trade-offs between reproductive and socioeconomic success in the highest social classes and the comparison of groups rather than individuals. Indeed, studies in contemporary low fertility settings have typically used aggregated samples that may mask positive wealth-fertility relationships. Furthermore, while much evidence attests to trade-offs between reproductive and socioeconomic success, few studies have explicitly tested the idea that such constraints are intensified by market integration. Using data from Mongolia, a post-socialist nation that underwent mass privatization, we examine wealth-fertility relationships over time and across a rural-urban gradient. Among post-reproductive women, reproductive fitness is the lowest in urban areas, but increases with wealth in all regions. After liberalization, a demographic-economic paradox emerges in urban areas: while educational attainment negatively impacts female fertility in all regions, education uniquely provides socioeconomic benefits in urban contexts. As market integration progresses, socio-economic returns to education increase and women who limit their reproduction to pursue education get wealthier. The results support the view that selection favoured mechanisms that respond to opportunities for status enhancement rather than fertility maximization.

摘要

市场一体化所带来的负财富-生育关系仍然是经典进化模型中的一个难题。进化生态学家认为,这种现象源于最高社会阶层在生殖与社会经济成功之间更强的权衡取舍,以及群体而非个体之间的比较。的确,当代低生育率环境下的研究通常使用汇总样本,这可能掩盖了正财富-生育关系。此外,虽然有大量证据证明生殖与社会经济成功之间存在权衡取舍,但很少有研究明确检验这种限制会因市场一体化而加剧这一观点。我们利用经历大规模私有化的后社会主义国家蒙古的数据,研究了不同时间和城乡梯度上的财富-生育关系。在已过生育期的女性中,生殖健康在城市地区最低,但在所有地区都随财富增加而提高。自由化之后,城市地区出现了人口经济悖论:虽然教育程度在所有地区都会对女性生育产生负面影响,但教育在城市环境中独特地提供社会经济利益。随着市场一体化的推进,教育的社会经济回报增加,那些为追求教育而限制生育的女性变得更加富有。研究结果支持了这样一种观点,即选择有利于那些对地位提升机会而非生育最大化机会做出反应的机制。