• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肩部不稳定的在线资源:患者在阅读什么?

Online resources for shoulder instability: what are patients reading?

作者信息

Garcia Grant H, Taylor Samuel A, Dy Christopher J, Christ Alexander, Patel Ronak M, Dines Joshua S

机构信息

Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021. E-mail address for G.H. Garcia:

University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX 77555.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Oct 15;96(20):e177. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01228.

DOI:10.2106/JBJS.M.01228
PMID:25320207
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evaluations of the medical literature suggest that many online sites provide poor-quality information. The purpose of our study was to investigate the value of online resources for patient education about shoulder instability.

METHODS

Three search terms ("shoulder instability," "loose shoulder," and "shoulder dislocation") were entered into three Internet search engines. Three orthopaedic residents independently gauged the quality and accuracy of the information with use of a set of predetermined scoring criteria, in addition to noting whether or not four potential surgery options were mentioned. The readability of the web sites was evaluated with use of the Flesch-Kincaid score.

RESULTS

Eighty-two unique web sites were evaluated. Quality and accuracy were significantly higher with use of the term "shoulder instability" compared with the term "loose shoulder" (quality, p < 0.001; accuracy, p = 0.001). However, the reading level was significantly more advanced for the "shoulder instability" web sites (p < 0.001). Quality was significantly higher on web sites with reading levels above the eighth grade level (p = 0.001) (88% of web sites). Only twenty-three sites (28%) mentioned surgical options for shoulder instability, and of these, only eight mentioned thermal capsulorrhaphy as a primary treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Online information regarding shoulder instability is often inaccurate and/or at an inappropriately high reading level. The quality of information is highly dependent on the specific search term used. Clinicians need to be aware of the information that is available online and should help direct patients to proper sites and guide Internet search terms.

摘要

背景

对医学文献的评估表明,许多在线网站提供的信息质量较差。我们研究的目的是调查在线资源对患者进行肩部不稳定教育的价值。

方法

在三个互联网搜索引擎中输入三个搜索词(“肩部不稳定”、“肩部松弛”和“肩关节脱位”)。三名骨科住院医师除了记录是否提及四种潜在的手术选择外,还使用一组预先确定的评分标准独立评估信息的质量和准确性。使用弗莱什-金凯德分数评估网站的可读性。

结果

共评估了82个独特的网站。与“肩部松弛”一词相比,使用“肩部不稳定”一词时,质量和准确性显著更高(质量,p < 0.001;准确性,p = 0.001)。然而,“肩部不稳定”网站的阅读水平明显更高(p < 0.001)。阅读水平高于八年级的网站质量显著更高(p = 0.001)(占网站的88%)。只有23个网站(28%)提到了肩部不稳定的手术选择,其中只有8个提到热囊缩术作为主要治疗方法。

结论

关于肩部不稳定的在线信息往往不准确和/或阅读水平过高。信息质量高度依赖于所使用的特定搜索词。临床医生需要了解在线可用的信息,并应帮助引导患者访问合适的网站并指导互联网搜索词。

相似文献

1
Online resources for shoulder instability: what are patients reading?肩部不稳定的在线资源:患者在阅读什么?
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Oct 15;96(20):e177. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01228.
2
The effect of search term on the quality and accuracy of online information regarding distal radius fractures.搜索词对桡骨远端骨折在线信息的质量和准确性的影响。
J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Sep;37(9):1881-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.05.021. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
3
Internet search term affects the quality and accuracy of online information about developmental hip dysplasia.互联网搜索词会影响有关发育性髋关节发育不良的在线信息的质量和准确性。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2013 Jun;33(4):361-5. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e31827d0dd2.
4
Evaluating the Quality, Accuracy, and Readability of Online Resources Pertaining to Hallux Valgus.评估与拇外翻相关的在线资源的质量、准确性和可读性。
Foot Ankle Spec. 2016 Feb;9(1):17-23. doi: 10.1177/1938640015592840. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
5
Quality and readability of online resources on chronic ankle instability.慢性踝关节不稳在线资源的质量和可读性。
Foot Ankle Surg. 2022 Apr;28(3):384-389. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2021.05.003. Epub 2021 May 19.
6
Internet resources for Tommy John injuries: what are patients reading?关于“汤米·约翰手术”损伤的网络资源:患者都在看些什么?
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Dec;25(12):e386-e393. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.07.073. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
7
Cauda equina syndrome: assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.马尾综合征:评估互联网上患者信息的可读性和质量。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 May 1;39(10):E645-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000282.
8
Evaluation of the Quality, Accuracy, and Readability of Online Patient Resources for the Management of Articular Cartilage Defects.评估用于关节软骨缺损管理的在线患者资源的质量、准确性和可读性。
Cartilage. 2017 Apr;8(2):112-118. doi: 10.1177/1947603516648737. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
9
Most American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons' online patient education material exceeds average patient reading level.美国矫形外科医师学会的大多数在线患者教育材料超过了普通患者的阅读水平。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Apr;473(4):1181-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4071-2. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
10
Readability, suitability, and health content assessment of web-based patient education materials on colorectal cancer screening.基于网络的结直肠癌筛查患者教育材料的可读性、适宜性和健康内容评估。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Aug;80(2):284-90. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.01.034. Epub 2014 Mar 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Perceptions of Social Media Use by Orthopaedic Surgeons: Comparing Responses Across the United States.患者对骨科医生使用社交媒体的看法:美国各地的回应比较
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2025 Jan 27;7(3):101097. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101097. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
The role of generative artificial intelligence in deciding fusion treatment of lumbar degeneration: a comparative analysis and narrative review.生成式人工智能在腰椎退变融合治疗决策中的作用:一项比较分析与叙述性综述
Eur Spine J. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09052-z.
3
Enhancing responses from large language models with role-playing prompts: a comparative study on answering frequently asked questions about total knee arthroplasty.
通过角色扮演提示增强大语言模型的回答:关于全膝关节置换术常见问题解答的比较研究
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 May 23;25(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03024-5.
4
[Internet resources on plantar fasciitis : German-language analysis of the information content of digital sourcess].[关于足底筋膜炎的网络资源:对数字资源信息内容的德语分析]
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2025 Jul;54(7):550-557. doi: 10.1007/s00132-025-04641-8. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
5
Evaluating the Quality and Readability of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Chatbot Responses in the Management of Achilles Tendon Rupture.评估生成式人工智能(AI)聊天机器人在跟腱断裂管理中的回复质量和可读性。
Cureus. 2025 Jan 31;17(1):e78313. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78313. eCollection 2025 Jan.
6
[Online resources for ankle sprains : A German language web analysis].[踝关节扭伤的在线资源:德语网络分析]
Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2025 Mar;128(3):201-208. doi: 10.1007/s00113-024-01526-x. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
7
Evaluation of Online Shoulder Instability-Related Patient Education Materials.在线肩部不稳定相关患者教育材料的评估
HSS J. 2025 May;21(2):158-165. doi: 10.1177/15563316241254056. Epub 2024 May 26.
8
Is ChatGPT a trusted source of information for total hip and knee arthroplasty patients?ChatGPT 对全髋关节和膝关节置换患者来说是可靠的信息来源吗?
Bone Jt Open. 2024 Feb 15;5(2):139-146. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.52.BJO-2023-0113.R1.
9
From quality to clarity: evaluating the effectiveness of online ınformation related to septic arthritis.从质量到清晰度:评估与脓毒性关节炎相关的在线信息的有效性。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Sep 15;18(1):689. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04181-x.
10
Republication of "Online Patient Resources for Ankle Instability: An Objective Analysis of Available Materials".《踝关节不稳的在线患者资源:可用材料的客观分析》再版
Foot Ankle Orthop. 2023 Aug 21;8(3):24730114231195334. doi: 10.1177/24730114231195334. eCollection 2023 Jul.