• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The "long tail" and public health: new thinking for addressing health disparities.“长尾”与公共卫生:解决健康差距的新思路。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Dec;104(12):2271-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302039. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
2
Small media and client reminders for colorectal cancer screening: current use and gap areas in CDC's Colorectal Cancer Control Program.小型媒体和客户端提醒在结直肠癌筛查中的应用:美国疾病预防控制中心结直肠癌控制项目中的当前使用和差距领域。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E131. doi: 10.5888/pcd9.110317. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
3
Effect of an equal-access military health system on racial disparities in colorectal cancer screening.均等化军医保体系对结直肠癌筛查中种族差异的影响。
Cancer. 2018 Sep 15;124(18):3724-3732. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31637. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
4
Strategies for expanding colorectal cancer screening at community health centers.在社区卫生中心扩大结直肠癌筛查的策略。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2013 Jul-Aug;63(4):221-31. doi: 10.3322/caac.21191.
5
Understanding the role of access in Hispanic cancer screening disparities.理解可及性在西班牙裔癌症筛查差异中的作用。
Cancer. 2023 May 15;129(10):1569-1578. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34696. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
6
Use of Evidence-Based Interventions to Address Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening.使用基于证据的干预措施来解决结直肠癌筛查中的差异。
MMWR Suppl. 2016 Feb 12;65(1):21-8. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.su6501a5.
7
What Is Organized Screening and What Is Its Value?什么是有组织的筛查,它有什么价值?
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2020 Jul;30(3):393-411. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2020.02.002. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
8
Exploring implications of Medicaid participation and wait times for colorectal screening on early detection efforts in Connecticut--a secret-shopper survey.探索医疗补助计划参与情况及结直肠癌筛查等待时间对康涅狄格州早期检测工作的影响——一项暗访调查
Conn Med. 2013 Apr;77(4):197-203.
9
Trends in colorectal cancer screening over time for persons with and without chronic disability.随着时间推移,有和没有慢性残疾的人群在结直肠癌筛查方面的趋势。
Disabil Health J. 2016 Jul;9(3):498-509. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
10
NIH state-of-the-science conference statement: Enhancing use and quality of colorectal cancer screening.美国国立卫生研究院科学现状会议声明:提高结直肠癌筛查的利用率和质量。
NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2010 Feb 4;27(1):1-31.

引用本文的文献

1
A critical analysis of online social support for young people experiencing chronic pain.对为遭受慢性疼痛的年轻人提供的在线社会支持的批判性分析。
Aust J Psychol. 2023 May 25;75(1):2216303. doi: 10.1080/00049530.2023.2216303. eCollection 2023.
2
Improving dissemination products and practices for community-based organisations serving LGBTQ+ communities in the USA: a thematic analysis.改善美国为 LGBTQ+ 社区服务的社区组织的传播产品与实践:一项主题分析。
BMJ Public Health. 2024 Nov 7;2(2):e001106. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001106. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
The Cost of Diversity: An Analysis of Representation and Cost Barriers in Stock Photo Libraries for Health Education Materials, 2021.多样性的代价:2021 年健康教育材料中股票照片库的代表性和成本障碍分析。
Health Promot Pract. 2024 May;25(3):346-357. doi: 10.1177/15248399221150788. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
4
Spatiotemporal Analysis of Online Purchase of HIV Self-testing Kits in China, 2015-2017: Longitudinal Observational Study.中国 2015-2017 年 HIV 自我检测试剂盒在线购买的时空分析:纵向观察研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Sep 27;8(9):e37922. doi: 10.2196/37922.
5
Defining a specialty through its literature: A bibliometric analysis of acute care surgery 2005 to 2020.通过文献界定一个专业领域:2005年至2020年急性护理手术的文献计量分析
Surg Open Sci. 2022 Jun 23;10:43-49. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2022.06.003. eCollection 2022 Oct.
6
How Do Social Needs Cluster Among Low-Income Individuals?社会需求在低收入人群中如何聚类?
Popul Health Manag. 2021 Jun;24(3):322-332. doi: 10.1089/pop.2020.0107. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
7
National Trends in the Prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease Among Racial/Ethnic and Socioeconomic Status Groups, 1988-2016.1988 年至 2016 年,不同种族/民族和社会经济地位群体中慢性肾脏病的流行趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e207932. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.7932.
8
Risk, Resilience, and Smoking in a National, Probability Sample of Sexual and Gender Minority Adults, 2017, USA.2017 年美国全国性少数群体成年人性行为和性别认同概率抽样调查中的风险、适应力和吸烟状况。
Health Educ Behav. 2020 Apr;47(2):272-283. doi: 10.1177/1090198119893374. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
9
'Social screens' and 'the mainstream': longitudinal competitors of non-organized physical activity in the transition from childhood to adolescence.“社交屏幕”和“主流媒体”:儿童向青少年过渡时期非组织性身体活动的纵向竞争者。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Jan 14;17(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0908-0.
10
Increasing gaps in health inequalities related to non-communicable diseases in South Australia; implications towards behavioural risk factor surveillance systems to provide evidence for action.南澳大利亚州与非传染性疾病相关的健康不平等差距日益扩大;对行为风险因素监测系统提出了影响,以提供采取行动的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jan 8;19(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6323-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Small media and client reminders for colorectal cancer screening: current use and gap areas in CDC's Colorectal Cancer Control Program.小型媒体和客户端提醒在结直肠癌筛查中的应用:美国疾病预防控制中心结直肠癌控制项目中的当前使用和差距领域。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E131. doi: 10.5888/pcd9.110317. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
2
Increasing information-seeking about human papillomavirus vaccination through community partnerships in African American and Hispanic communities.通过非裔美国人和西班牙裔社区的社区伙伴关系,增加对人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种的信息查询。
Fam Community Health. 2012 Jan-Mar;35(1):15-30. doi: 10.1097/FCH.0b013e3182385d13.
3
Colorectal cancer screening - United States, 2002, 2004, 2006, and 2008.2002年、2004年、2006年及2008年美国的结直肠癌筛查
MMWR Suppl. 2011 Jan 14;60(1):42-6.
4
The Colorectal Cancer Control Program: partnering to increase population level screening.结直肠癌控制项目:携手合作提高人群筛查水平。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Mar;73(3):429-34. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.12.027.
5
Cancer control planners' perceptions and use of evidence-based programs.癌症控制规划者对循证项目的认知和使用。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2010 May-Jun;16(3):E1-8. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181b3a3b1.
6
Client-directed interventions to increase community access to breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening a systematic review.以客户为导向的干预措施,以增加社区获得乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查的机会:一项系统评价
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Jul;35(1 Suppl):S56-66. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.04.001.
7
Recommendations for client- and provider-directed interventions to increase breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening.关于由客户和提供者主导的干预措施的建议,以增加乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查。
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Jul;35(1 Suppl):S21-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.04.004.
8
Transcending the known in public health practice: the inequality paradox: the population approach and vulnerable populations.超越公共卫生实践中的已知:不平等悖论:人群方法与弱势群体
Am J Public Health. 2008 Feb;98(2):216-21. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.114777. Epub 2008 Jan 2.
9
Sick individuals and sick populations.患病个体与患病群体。
Int J Epidemiol. 2001 Jun;30(3):427-32; discussion 433-4. doi: 10.1093/ije/30.3.427.
10
Cultural sensitivity and readability of breast and prostate printed cancer education materials targeting African Americans.针对非裔美国人的乳腺癌和前列腺癌印刷版癌症教育材料的文化敏感性和可读性。
J Natl Med Assoc. 1998 Mar;90(3):165-9.

“长尾”与公共卫生:解决健康差距的新思路。

The "long tail" and public health: new thinking for addressing health disparities.

作者信息

Kreuter Matthew W, Hovmand Peter, Pfeiffer Debbie J, Fairchild Maggie, Rath Suchitra, Golla Balaji, Casey Chris

机构信息

Matthew W. Kreuter, Debbie J. Pfeiffer, Maggie Fairchild, Suchitra Rath, Balaji Golla, and Chris Casey are with the Health Communication Research Laboratory, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO. Peter Hovmand is with The Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2014 Dec;104(12):2271-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302039. Epub 2014 Oct 16.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2014.302039
PMID:25322308
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4232172/
Abstract

The prevailing approach to improving population health focuses on shifting population means through a few targeted and universal interventions. The success of this approach for eliminating health disparities depends on an assumption about the distribution of demand for such interventions. We explored whether long tail thinking from business might yield greater progress in eliminating disparities. We examined 2011 to 2013 data from 513 state and local health agency representatives in 47 states who used an online system to create 4351 small media and client reminder products promoting colorectal cancer screening. Products in the long tail were more likely to target minority groups with higher rates of colorectal cancer and lower rates of screening than Whites. Long tail thinking could help improve the public's health and eliminate disparities.

摘要

改善人群健康的主流方法侧重于通过一些有针对性的普遍干预措施来改变人群的平均健康水平。这种消除健康差距的方法的成功取决于对这类干预措施需求分布的一种假设。我们探讨了商业领域的长尾思维是否能在消除差距方面取得更大进展。我们研究了2011年至2013年来自47个州的513名州和地方卫生机构代表的数据,这些代表使用一个在线系统创建了4351个促进结直肠癌筛查的小型媒体和客户提醒产品。长尾中的产品比针对白人的产品更有可能针对结直肠癌发病率较高且筛查率较低的少数群体。长尾思维有助于改善公众健康并消除差距。