East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Health Educ Behav. 2020 Apr;47(2):272-283. doi: 10.1177/1090198119893374. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
. There are well-documented inequities in smoking between sexual and gender minority (SGM; e.g., lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender [LGBT]) and straight and cisgender people. However, there is less information about risk for and resilience against smoking among SGM people. Such information is critical for understanding etiology and developing interventions. . To conduct a within-group assessment of risks and resiliencies relating to smoking status. In 2017, we conducted a cross-sectional telephone survey with a national, probability-based sample of SGM adults ( = 453). We assessed theory-informed risks (adverse childhood events, substance use-oriented social environment, mental distress, stigma, discrimination, social isolation, and identity concealment) and resiliencies (advertising skepticism, identity centrality, social support, and SGM community participation). We applied survey weights, standardized predictor variables, and fit logistic regression models predicting smoking status. We stratified by age and SGM identity. . Patterns of risk and resilience differ by age and identity. Effects were consistently in the same direction for all groups for participating in substance use-oriented social environments, pointing to a potential risk factor for all groups. Advertising skepticism and having people you can talk to about being LGBTQ were potential protective factors. . Intervention development should address risk and resilience that differs by SGM identity. Additionally, our findings suggest interventionists should consider theoretical frameworks beyond minority stress. . While much of the literature has focused on the role of stress from stigma and discrimination in tobacco use, addressing social norms and bolstering protective factors may also be important in SGM-targeted interventions.
. 性少数群体(例如女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别者)与异性恋和顺性别者之间的吸烟行为存在明显的不平等现象,这一点已有充分的文献记载。然而,关于性少数群体吸烟的风险和抵御能力的信息较少。这些信息对于了解病因学和制定干预措施至关重要。. 为了评估与吸烟状况相关的风险和抵御能力,我们在 2017 年进行了一项横断面电话调查,调查对象为全国性的、基于概率的性少数群体成年人样本(n=453)。我们评估了基于理论的风险因素(不良童年经历、以物质使用为导向的社会环境、精神困扰、污名化、歧视、社会孤立和身份隐瞒)和抵御能力(对广告的怀疑、身份认同、社会支持和参与性少数群体社区)。我们应用了调查权重、标准化预测变量,并拟合了预测吸烟状况的逻辑回归模型。我们按年龄和性少数群体身份进行了分层。. 风险和抵御能力的模式因年龄和身份而异。对于所有群体来说,参与以物质使用为导向的社会环境的影响方向一致,这可能是所有群体的一个潜在风险因素。对广告的怀疑和拥有可以谈论 LGBTQ 身份的人是潜在的保护因素。. 干预措施的制定应针对不同性少数群体身份的风险和抵御能力。此外,我们的研究结果表明,干预者应该考虑超越少数群体压力的理论框架。. 尽管大部分文献都集中在耻辱感和歧视所带来的压力对烟草使用的作用上,但解决社会规范和增强保护因素在性少数群体针对性干预中也可能很重要。