Buys David R, Howard Virginia J, McClure Leslie A, Buys Katie Crawford, Sawyer Patricia, Allman Richard M, Levitan Emily B
At the time of the study, David R. Buys and Richard M. Allman were and Patricia Sawyer is with the Division of Gerontology, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham. Virginia J. Howard and Emily B. Levitan are with the Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham. Leslie A. McClure is with the Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham. Katie Crawford Buys is with the Department of Community Health, Systems, and Outcomes, School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Am J Public Health. 2015 Jun;105(6):1181-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302048. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
We evaluated the effect of neighborhood disadvantage (ND) on older adults' prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension.
Data were from the University of Alabama at Birmingham Study of Aging, an observational study of 1000 community-dwelling Black and White Alabamians aged 65 years and older, in 1999 to 2001. We assessed hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control with blood pressure measurements and self-report data. We assessed ND with US Census data corresponding with participants' census tracts, created tertiles of ND, and fit models with generalized estimating equations via a logit link function with a binomial distribution. Adjusted models included variables assessing personal advantage and disadvantage, place-based factors, sociodemographics, comorbidities, and health behaviors.
Living in mid-ND (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.2, 2.1) and high-ND tertiles (AOR = 1.8; 95% CI = 1.3, 2.3) was associated with higher hypertension prevalence, and living in high-ND tertiles was associated with lower odds of controlled hypertension (AOR = 0.6; 95% CI = 0.4, 0.6). In adjusted models, ND was not associated with hypertension awareness or treatment.
These findings show that neighborhood environmental factors matter for hypertension outcomes and suggest the importance of ND for hypertension management in older adults.
我们评估了社区劣势(ND)对老年人高血压患病率、知晓率、治疗率和控制率的影响。
数据来自阿拉巴马大学伯明翰分校的衰老研究,这是一项对1000名居住在社区的65岁及以上阿拉巴马州黑人和白人进行的观察性研究,时间为1999年至2001年。我们通过血压测量和自我报告数据评估高血压患病率、知晓率、治疗率和控制率。我们使用与参与者普查区相对应的美国人口普查数据评估ND,创建ND三分位数,并通过具有二项分布的logit链接函数使用广义估计方程拟合模型。调整后的模型包括评估个人优势和劣势、基于地点的因素、社会人口统计学、合并症和健康行为的变量。
生活在中度ND(调整后的优势比[AOR]=1.6;95%置信区间[CI]=1.2,2.1)和高度ND三分位数(AOR=1.8;95%CI=1.3,2.3)与较高的高血压患病率相关,而生活在高度ND三分位数与较低的高血压控制几率相关(AOR=0.6;95%CI=0.4,0.6)。在调整后的模型中,ND与高血压知晓率或治疗率无关。
这些发现表明社区环境因素对高血压结局很重要,并提示ND对老年人高血压管理的重要性。