Suppr超能文献

收缩压的便捷测量:手动桡动脉脉搏压测量的可靠性和有效性

Convenient measurement of systolic pressure: the reliability and validity of manual radial pulse pressure measurement.

作者信息

Odagiri Takuya, Morita Tatsuya, Yamauchi Toshihiro, Imai Kengo, Tei You, Inoue Satoshi

机构信息

1 Seirei Hospice, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital , Shizuoka, Japan .

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2014 Nov;17(11):1226-30. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0665. Epub 2014 Oct 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is important to assess a patient's medical condition noninvasively, particularly in hospice care settings.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability of manually measuring the radial pulse pressure and its validity for predicting the systolic blood pressure.

DESIGN

An observational study consisting of two phases: a reliability study and a validity study.

SETTING/SUBJECTS: Patients admitted to a palliative care unit.

MEASUREMENTS

To assess the interrater reliability, the radial pulse pressure was prospectively measured independently by a physician and nurse using a three-level assessment (impalpable, weak, and normal) in 43 patients admitted to a palliative care unit. To assess the validity, we analyzed a total of 156 patients, consisting of the prospectively collected patients and 113 patients retrospectively recruited. Radial pulse and systolic blood pressures were recorded on admission. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of the radial pulse pressure to predict a systolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or more.

RESULTS

The κ coefficient of the physician and nurse was 0.788. The sensitivity and specificity to predict a systolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or more using the cutoff point of a normal versus weak/impalpable radial pulse pressure were 84% (95% confidence intervals, 77-89) and 82% (52-96), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Manually measuring the radial pulse pressure is reliable and can be used to indicate a systolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or more.

摘要

背景

以非侵入性方式评估患者的病情很重要,尤其是在临终关怀环境中。

目的

本研究旨在调查手动测量桡动脉脉搏压的可靠性及其预测收缩压的有效性。

设计

一项观察性研究,包括两个阶段:可靠性研究和有效性研究。

设置/对象:入住姑息治疗病房的患者。

测量

为评估评分者间信度,由一名医生和一名护士对入住姑息治疗病房的43例患者采用三级评估(触不到、微弱和正常)前瞻性独立测量桡动脉脉搏压。为评估有效性,我们共分析了156例患者,包括前瞻性收集的患者和113例回顾性招募的患者。入院时记录桡动脉脉搏和收缩压。我们计算了桡动脉脉搏压预测收缩压≥90mmHg的敏感性和特异性。

结果

医生和护士的κ系数为0.788。以正常桡动脉脉搏压与微弱/触不到的桡动脉脉搏压为界值预测收缩压≥90mmHg的敏感性和特异性分别为84%(95%置信区间,77-89)和82%(52-96)。

结论

手动测量桡动脉脉搏压是可靠的,可用于提示收缩压≥90mmHg。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验