Suppr超能文献

德国髋部骨折的发病率是否仍存在东西方差异?

Are there still east-to-west differences in the incidence of hip fractures in Germany?

作者信息

Defèr Alexander, Schober Hans-Christof, Möhrke Werner, Abendroth Klaus, Hofbauer Lorenz C

机构信息

Medical Office, Großenhainer Strasse 129, 01129, Dresden, Germany,

出版信息

Arch Osteoporos. 2014;9:195. doi: 10.1007/s11657-014-0195-y. Epub 2014 Oct 17.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

There are large regional differences in the incidence of hip fracture in Germany. These differences were unexpected and do not follow a north-to-south or an east-to-west gradient. But they are of high socioeconomic importance and cannot be explained by geographic location, the age structure of the population, and only to a small extent by the regulation of specific medication.

INTRODUCTION

The most important complications and the major cost factors of osteoporosis are fractures. In order to develop strategies for fracture prevention, knowledge about different incidence rates and possible causes is necessary.

METHODS

In order to detect persistent differences in the incidence of hip fractures between the former eastern and western states of Germany, structured diagnostic data of patients hospitalized between 2000 and 2011 were used to determine the regional incidence of hip fractures in the individual federal states of Germany. To account for error due to repeated admissions and double registrations, the frequency of fractures was corrected by a factor of 0.89.

RESULTS

Our analysis of the 10-year period from 2000 to 2011 did not confirm the difference between eastern and western Germany reported in the national literature, or the north-south gradient for Germany as reported in several European publications. We found significant differences in the incidence of fractures in adjacent territorial states such as Schleswig-Holstein and Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania or Saxony and Thuringia. Particularly, high incidence rates over the entire period were noted in the city-states of Hamburg, Berlin, and Bremen.

CONCLUSION

The reason for such differences is still unclear and, thus, the consequences of urbanization must be considered to explain diverse incidence rates. In general, the investigation of causes should be based on the use of a multivariate model that takes additional factors such as specific drug use, socioeconomic aspects, environmental aspects, education, and health care into account. There are large regional differences in the incidence of hip fracture in Germany. These differences were unexpected and do not follow a north-to-south or an east-to-west gradient. But they are of high socioeconomic importance and cannot be explained by geographic location, the age structure of the population and only to a small extent by the regulation of specific medication.

摘要

未标注

德国髋部骨折的发病率存在很大的地区差异。这些差异出乎意料,且并不遵循由北向南或由东向西的梯度变化。但它们具有很高的社会经济重要性,无法用地理位置、人口年龄结构来解释,仅在很小程度上可由特定药物的管控来解释。

引言

骨质疏松症最重要的并发症和主要成本因素是骨折。为了制定骨折预防策略,了解不同的发病率及可能的原因是必要的。

方法

为了检测德国前东部和西部各州之间髋部骨折发病率的持续差异,利用2000年至2011年期间住院患者的结构化诊断数据来确定德国各个联邦州髋部骨折的地区发病率。为了考虑因重复入院和重复登记导致的误差,骨折频率通过0.89的系数进行了校正。

结果

我们对2000年至2011年这十年期间的分析并未证实国内文献中报道的德国东部和西部之间的差异,也未证实一些欧洲出版物中报道的德国南北梯度差异。我们发现在相邻的州,如石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因州和梅克伦堡-前波美拉尼亚州或萨克森州和图林根州,骨折发病率存在显著差异。特别是,汉堡、柏林和不来梅这几个城市州在整个时期的发病率都很高。

结论

这种差异的原因仍不清楚,因此,必须考虑城市化的影响来解释不同的发病率。一般来说,病因调查应基于使用多变量模型,该模型要考虑特定药物使用、社会经济方面、环境方面、教育和医疗保健等其他因素。德国髋部骨折的发病率存在很大的地区差异。这些差异出乎意料,且并不遵循由北向南或由东向西的梯度变化。但它们具有很高的社会经济重要性,无法用地理位置、人口年龄结构来解释,仅在很小程度上可由特定药物的管控来解释。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验