Goodman Karyn A, Milgrom Sarah A, Herman Joseph M, Abdel-Wahab May, Azad Nilofer, Blackstock A William, Das Prajnan, Hong Theodore S, Jabbour Salma K, Jones William E, Konski Andre A, Koong Albert C, Kumar Rachit, Rodriguez-Bigas Miguel, Small William, Thomas Charles R, Suh W Warren
Oncology (Williston Park). 2014 Oct;28(10):867-71, 876, 878.
The management of rectal cancer in patients with metastatic disease at presentation is highly variable. There are no phase III trials addressing therapeutic approaches, and the optimal sequencing of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery remains unresolved. Although chemoradiation is standard for patients with stage II/III rectal cancer, its role in the metastatic setting is controversial. Omitting chemoradiation may not be appropriate in all stage IV patients, particularly those with symptomatic primary tumors. Moreover, outcomes in this setting are vastly different, as some treatments carry the potential for cure in selected patients, while others are purely palliative. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application, by the panel, of a well-established consensus methodology (Modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures. In instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used as the basis for recommending imaging or treatment.
初诊时患有转移性疾病的直肠癌患者的管理方式差异很大。目前尚无针对治疗方法的III期试验,化疗、放疗和手术的最佳顺序仍未确定。尽管放化疗是II/III期直肠癌患者的标准治疗方法,但其在转移性疾病中的作用仍存在争议。在所有IV期患者中省略放化疗可能并不合适,尤其是那些有症状的原发性肿瘤患者。此外,这种情况下的治疗结果差异很大,因为一些治疗方法有可能治愈部分患者,而另一些则纯粹是姑息性的。美国放射学会适宜性标准是针对特定临床情况的循证指南,由多学科专家小组每3年进行一次审查。指南的制定和审查包括对同行评审期刊上的当前医学文献进行广泛分析,以及专家小组应用成熟的共识方法(改良德尔菲法)对成像和治疗程序的适宜性进行评分。在缺乏证据或证据不明确的情况下,专家意见可作为推荐成像或治疗的依据。