• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗单纯性阑尾炎后短期住院的可行性。

Feasibility of the short hospital stays after laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis.

作者信息

Lee Jong Min, Jang Ji Young, Lee Seung Hwan, Shim Hongjin, Lee Jae Gil

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Surgery, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.

出版信息

Yonsei Med J. 2014 Nov;55(6):1606-10. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2014.55.6.1606.

DOI:10.3349/ymj.2014.55.6.1606
PMID:25323898
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4205701/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of short hospital stays after laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The records of 142 patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis from January 2010 to December 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were allocated to an early (<48 hours) or a late (>48 hours) group by postoperative hospital stay. Postoperative complications and readmission rates in the two groups were evaluated and compared.

RESULTS

Overall mean patient age was 50.1 (±16.0) years, and mean hospital stay was 3.8 (±2.8) days. Fifty-four patients (group E, 38.0%) were discharged within 48 hours of surgery, and 88 patients (group L, 62.0%) stayed more than 48 hours. Overall complication rates were similar in the two groups (14.8% vs. 21.6%, p=0.318), and wound complications (13.0% vs. 12.5%), postoperative bowel obstruction (1.9% vs. 2.3%), and abdominal pain (1.9% vs. 3.4%) were not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

Patients that undergo laparoscopic appendectomy due to uncomplicated appendicitis may be safely discharged within 48 hours. Further study should be conducted to determine the optimal length of hospital stay after laparoscopic appendectomy to reduce hospital costs.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估单纯性阑尾炎行腹腔镜阑尾切除术后短时间住院的可行性。

材料与方法

回顾性分析2010年1月至2012年12月期间142例行腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗单纯性阑尾炎患者的病历资料。根据术后住院时间将患者分为早期(<48小时)组和晚期(>48小时)组。对两组术后并发症及再入院率进行评估和比较。

结果

患者总体平均年龄为50.1(±16.0)岁,平均住院时间为3.8(±2.8)天。54例患者(E组,38.0%)在术后48小时内出院,88例患者(L组,62.0%)住院时间超过48小时。两组总体并发症发生率相似(14.8%对21.6%,p = 0.318),伤口并发症(13.0%对12.5%)、术后肠梗阻(1.9%对2.3%)及腹痛(1.9%对3.4%)差异均无统计学意义。

结论

因单纯性阑尾炎行腹腔镜阑尾切除术的患者可在48小时内安全出院。应进一步开展研究以确定腹腔镜阑尾切除术后的最佳住院时间,从而降低住院费用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6416/4205701/3a065c48ec2d/ymj-55-1606-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6416/4205701/3a065c48ec2d/ymj-55-1606-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6416/4205701/3a065c48ec2d/ymj-55-1606-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Feasibility of the short hospital stays after laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis.腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗单纯性阑尾炎后短期住院的可行性。
Yonsei Med J. 2014 Nov;55(6):1606-10. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2014.55.6.1606.
2
Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Complicated Acute Appendicitis in the Elderly: A Single-center Experience.老年复杂性急性阑尾炎的腹腔镜阑尾切除术:单中心经验
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Oct;27(5):366-368. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000447.
3
Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol allows ambulatory laparoscopic appendectomy in uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a prospective, randomized trial.术后康复方案允许在单纯性急性阑尾炎行腹腔镜阑尾切除术:一项前瞻性、随机试验。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Feb;33(2):429-436. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6315-9. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
4
Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy in management of uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗单纯性和复杂性阑尾炎的疗效比较。
Ann Surg. 2011 Dec;254(6):927-32. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31822aa8ea.
5
Impact of previous abdominal surgery on laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis.既往腹部手术对急性阑尾炎腹腔镜阑尾切除术的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2007 Apr;21(4):570-3. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9027-5. Epub 2006 Nov 14.
6
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jul;205(1):60-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.017.
7
Outcomes and cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis: 4-years experience in a district hospital.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的疗效及成本分析:一家区级医院的4年经验
BMC Surg. 2014 Mar 19;14:14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-14-14.
8
Factors affecting the length of hospital stay after laparoscopic appendectomy: A single center study.腹腔镜阑尾切除术住院时间的影响因素:单中心研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 9;15(12):e0243575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243575. eCollection 2020.
9
Single-incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Experiences From 1208 Cases of Single-incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy. Experiences From 1208 Cases of Single-incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy.单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术:1208例单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的经验。1208例单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的经验。
Ann Surg. 2015 Dec;262(6):1054-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001064.
10
Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Open Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis: A Prospective Comparative Study.腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的前瞻性对比研究
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2016;14(55):244-248.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility of single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy in a small hospital.小型医院单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的可行性
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2016 Aug;91(2):74-9. doi: 10.4174/astr.2016.91.2.74. Epub 2016 Jul 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcome comparison between laparoscopic and open appendectomy: evidence from a nationwide population-based study.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术的疗效比较:一项基于全国人群的研究证据。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 12;8(7):e68662. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068662. Print 2013.
2
Enteral and parenteral nutrition in the perioperative period: state of the art.围手术期的肠内和肠外营养:最新进展。
Nutrients. 2013 Feb 21;5(2):608-23. doi: 10.3390/nu5020608.
3
Randomized prospective study to compare laparoscopic appendectomy versus umbilical single-incision appendectomy.
随机前瞻性研究比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术与脐部单切口阑尾切除术。
Ann Surg. 2013 Mar;257(3):413-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318278d225.
4
A comparison of the periumbilical incision and the intraumbilical incision in laparoscopic appendectomy.腹腔镜阑尾切除术中脐周切口与脐内切口的比较。
J Korean Surg Soc. 2012 Dec;83(6):360-6. doi: 10.4174/jkss.2012.83.6.360. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
5
Safety and efficacy of antibiotics compared with appendicectomy for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.抗生素与阑尾切除术治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎的安全性和有效性比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2012 Apr 5;344:e2156. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2156.
6
Outpatient laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis.急性阑尾炎的门诊腹腔镜阑尾切除术
Am Surg. 2012 Feb;78(2):213-5.
7
Comparison of clinical outcomes and hospital cost between open appendectomy and laparoscopic appendectomy.开腹阑尾切除术与腹腔镜阑尾切除术的临床结局及住院费用比较。
J Korean Surg Soc. 2011 Nov;81(5):321-5. doi: 10.4174/jkss.2011.81.5.321. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
8
Short- and long-term results of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy.开腹与腹腔镜阑尾切除术的近期和远期疗效。
World J Surg. 2011 Jun;35(6):1221-6; discussion 1227-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1088-5.
9
Outpatient laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a new step ahead.门诊腹腔镜肾上腺切除术:新的一步。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Aug;25(8):2570-3. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1588-2. Epub 2011 Feb 27.
10
Impact of an outpatient appendectomy protocol on clinical outcomes and cost: a case-control study.门诊阑尾切除术方案对临床结果和成本的影响:一项病例对照研究。
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Dec;211(6):731-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.07.017. Epub 2010 Sep 16.