Department of Internal Medicine - Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen Tübingen, Germany ; Department of Psychology, Clemson University Clemson, SC, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine - Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen Tübingen, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2014 Oct 1;5:1079. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01079. eCollection 2014.
Predicting who responds to placebo treatment-and under which circumstances-has been a question of interest and investigation for generations. However, the literature is disparate and inconclusive. This review aims to identify publications that provide high quality data on the topic of placebo response (PR) prediction.
To identify studies concerned with PR prediction, independent searches were performed in an expert database (for all symptom modalities) and in PubMed (for pain only). Articles were selected when (a) they assessed putative predictors prior to placebo treatment and (b) an adequate control group was included when the associations of predictors and PRs were analyzed.
Twenty studies were identified, most with pain as dependent variable. Most predictors of PRs were psychological constructs related to actions, expected outcomes and the emotional valence attached to these events (goal-seeking, self-efficacy/-esteem, locus of control, optimism). Other predictors involved behavioral control (desire for control, eating restraint), personality variables (fun seeking, sensation seeking, neuroticism), or biological markers (sex, a single nucleotide polymorphism related to dopamine metabolism). Finally, suggestibility and beliefs in expectation biases, body consciousness, and baseline symptom severity were found to be predictive.
While results are heterogeneous, some congruence of predictors can be identified. PRs mainly appear to be moderated by expectations of how the symptom might change after treatment, or expectations of how symptom repetition can be coped with. It is suggested to include the listed constructs in future research. Furthermore, a closer look at variables moderating symptom change in control groups seems warranted.
预测哪些人对安慰剂治疗有反应,以及在何种情况下有反应,是几代人都感兴趣和研究的问题。然而,文献却各不相同,没有定论。本综述旨在确定提供关于安慰剂反应(PR)预测主题的高质量数据的出版物。
为了确定与 PR 预测相关的研究,在专家数据库(针对所有症状模态)和 PubMed(仅针对疼痛)中独立进行了搜索。当(a)在安慰剂治疗前评估假设的预测因子,以及(b)当分析预测因子和 PR 之间的关联时包括适当的对照组时,选择文章。
确定了 20 项研究,其中大多数以疼痛为因变量。PR 的大多数预测因子是与行为、预期结果和对这些事件的情感价值相关的心理构念(寻求目标、自我效能/自尊、控制源、乐观主义)。其他预测因子包括行为控制(控制欲、饮食克制)、人格变量(寻求乐趣、感觉寻求、神经质)或生物标志物(性别、与多巴胺代谢相关的单核苷酸多态性)。最后,发现暗示性和对期望偏差、身体意识和基线症状严重程度的信念具有预测性。
虽然结果存在异质性,但可以确定一些预测因子具有一致性。PR 主要似乎受到对治疗后症状可能如何变化的预期,或对如何应对症状重复的预期的调节。建议在未来的研究中纳入这些列出的构念。此外,似乎有必要更仔细地观察对照组中调节症状变化的变量。