Jordan Amy S, Cori Jennifer M, Dawson Andrew, Nicholas Christian L, O'Donoghue Fergal J, Catcheside Peter G, Eckert Danny J, McEvoy R Doug, Trinder John
University of Melbourne, Parkville VIC, Australia: Institute for Breathing and Sleep, Heidelberg VIC, Australia.
University of Melbourne, Parkville VIC, Australia: : Institute for Breathing and Sleep, Heidelberg VIC, Australia.
Sleep. 2015 Jan 1;38(1):53-9. doi: 10.5665/sleep.4324.
To compare changes in end-tidal CO2, genioglossus muscle activity and upper airway resistance following tone-induced arousal and the return to sleep in healthy individuals with small and large ventilatory responses to arousal.
Observational study.
Two sleep physiology laboratories.
35 men and 25 women with no medical or sleep disorders.
Auditory tones to induce 3-s to 15-s cortical arousals from sleep.
During arousal from sleep, subjects with large ventilatory responses to arousal had higher ventilation (by analytical design) and tidal volume, and more marked reductions in the partial pressure of end-tidal CO2 compared to subjects with small ventilatory responses to arousal. However, following the return to sleep, ventilation, genioglossus muscle activity, and upper airway resistance did not differ between high and low ventilatory response groups (Breath 1 on return to sleep: ventilation 6.7±0.4 and 5.5±0.3 L/min, peak genioglossus activity 3.4%±1.0% and 4.8%±1.0% maximum, upper airway resistance 4.7±0.7 and 5.5±1.0 cm H2O/L/s, respectively). Furthermore, dilator muscle activity did not fall below the pre-arousal sleeping level and upper airway resistance did not rise above the pre-arousal sleeping level in either group for 10 breaths following the return to sleep.
Regardless of the magnitude of the ventilatory response to arousal from sleep and subsequent reduction in PETCO2, healthy individuals did not develop reduced dilator muscle activity nor increased upper airway resistance, indicative of partial airway collapse, on the return to sleep. These findings challenge the commonly stated notion that arousals predispose to upper airway obstruction.
比较健康个体在对觉醒产生小通气反应和大通气反应时,潮气末二氧化碳、颏舌肌活动及上气道阻力在由音调诱发觉醒及恢复睡眠后的变化。
观察性研究。
两个睡眠生理实验室。
35名男性和25名女性,无医学或睡眠障碍。
听觉音调诱发从睡眠中3秒至15秒的皮层觉醒。
在从睡眠中觉醒期间,与对觉醒产生小通气反应的受试者相比,对觉醒产生大通气反应的受试者通气量(通过分析设计)和潮气量更高,潮气末二氧化碳分压降低更明显。然而,恢复睡眠后,高通气反应组和低通气反应组在通气、颏舌肌活动及上气道阻力方面并无差异(恢复睡眠时的第1次呼吸:通气量分别为6.7±0.4和5.5±0.3升/分钟,颏舌肌峰值活动分别为最大活动的3.4%±1.0%和4.8%±1.0%,上气道阻力分别为4.7±0.7和5.5±1.0厘米水柱/升/秒)。此外,恢复睡眠后两组在10次呼吸中,扩张肌活动均未降至觉醒前睡眠水平以下,上气道阻力也未升至觉醒前睡眠水平以上。
无论从睡眠中觉醒时通气反应的大小以及随后呼气末二氧化碳分压的降低情况如何,健康个体在恢复睡眠时均未出现扩张肌活动降低或上气道阻力增加,即未出现部分气道塌陷。这些发现挑战了普遍认为的觉醒易导致上气道阻塞的观点。