Joosten Simon A, Edwards Bradley A, Wellman Andrew, Turton Anthony, Skuza Elizabeth M, Berger Philip J, Hamilton Garun S
Monash Lung and Sleep, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Ritchie Centre, Monash Institute of Medical Research/Prince Henry Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Sleep. 2015 Sep 1;38(9):1469-78. doi: 10.5665/sleep.4992.
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) resolves in lateral sleep in 20% of patients. However, the effect of lateral positioning on factors contributing to OSA has not been studied. We aimed to measure the effect of lateral positioning on the key pathophysiological contributors to OSA including lung volume, passive airway anatomy/collapsibility, the ability of the airway to stiffen and dilate, ventilatory control instability (loop gain), and arousal threshold.
Non-randomized single arm observational study.
Sleep laboratory.
PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: 20 (15M, 5F) continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)-treated severe OSA patients.
Supine vs. lateral position.
CPAP dial-downs performed during sleep to measure: (i) Veupnea: asleep ventilatory requirement, (ii) passive V0: ventilation off CPAP when airway dilator muscles are quiescent, (iii) Varousal: ventilation at which respiratory arousals occur, (iv) active V0: ventilation off CPAP when airway dilator muscles are activated during sleep, (v) loop gain: the ratio of the ventilatory drive response to a disturbance in ventilation, (vi) arousal threshold: level of ventilatory drive which leads to arousal, (vii) upper airway gain (UAG): ability of airway muscles to restore ventilation in response to increases in ventilatory drive, and (viii) pharyngeal critical closing pressure (Pcrit). Awake functional residual capacity (FRC) was also recorded.
Lateral positioning significantly increased passive V0 (0.33 ± 0.76L/min vs. 3.56 ± 2.94L/min, P < 0.001), active V0 (1.10 ± 1.97L/min vs. 4.71 ± 3.08L/min, P < 0.001), and FRC (1.31 ± 0.56 L vs. 1.42 ± 0.62 L, P = 0.046), and significantly decreased Pcrit (2.02 ± 2.55 cm H2O vs. -1.92 ± 3.87 cm H2O, P < 0.001). Loop gain, arousal threshold, Varousal, and UAG were not significantly altered.
Lateral positioning significantly improves passive airway anatomy/collapsibility (passive V0, pharyngeal critical closing pressure), the ability of the airway to stiffen and dilate (active V0), and the awake functional residual capacity without improving loop gain or arousal threshold.
20%的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者在侧卧位睡眠时症状会缓解。然而,侧卧位对导致OSA的相关因素的影响尚未得到研究。我们旨在测量侧卧位对OSA关键病理生理因素的影响,这些因素包括肺容量、被动气道解剖结构/可塌陷性、气道变硬和扩张的能力、通气控制不稳定性(环路增益)以及觉醒阈值。
非随机单臂观察性研究。
睡眠实验室。
患者/参与者:20名(15名男性,5名女性)接受持续气道正压通气(CPAP)治疗的重度OSA患者。
仰卧位与侧卧位。
睡眠期间进行CPAP下调以测量:(i)Veupnea:睡眠时的通气需求;(ii)被动V0:气道扩张肌静止时停用CPAP时的通气量;(iii)Varousal:发生呼吸觉醒时的通气量;(iv)主动V0:睡眠期间气道扩张肌激活时停用CPAP时的通气量;(v)环路增益:通气驱动反应与通气干扰的比值;(vi)觉醒阈值:导致觉醒的通气驱动水平;(vii)上气道增益(UAG):气道肌肉响应通气驱动增加恢复通气的能力;(viii)咽部临界闭合压(Pcrit)。还记录了清醒时的功能残气量(FRC)。
侧卧位显著增加了被动V0(0.33±0.76L/分钟对3.56±2.94L/分钟,P<0.001)、主动V0(1.10±1.97L/分钟对4.71±3.08L/分钟,P<0.001)和FRC(1.31±0.56L对1.42±0.62L,P = 0.046),并显著降低了Pcrit(2.02±2.55cmH2O对-1.92±3.87cmH2O,P<0.001)。环路增益、觉醒阈值、Varousal和UAG没有显著改变。
侧卧位显著改善了被动气道解剖结构/可塌陷性(被动V0、咽部临界闭合压)、气道变硬和扩张的能力(主动V0)以及清醒时的功能残气量,而没有改善环路增益或觉醒阈值。