• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保护发布的基因:社交网络与 GINA 的局限性。

Protecting posted genes: social networking and the limits of GINA.

机构信息

a Stanford University.

出版信息

Am J Bioeth. 2014;14(11):32-44. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.957417.

DOI:10.1080/15265161.2014.957417
PMID:25325810
Abstract

The combination of decreased genotyping costs and prolific social media use is fueling a personal genetic testing industry in which consumers purchase and interact with genetic risk information online. Consumers and their genetic risk profiles are protected in some respects by the 2008 federal Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA), which forbids the discriminatory use of genetic information by employers and health insurers; however, practical and technical limitations undermine its enforceability, given the everyday practices of online social networking and its impact on the workplace. In the Web 2.0 era, employers in most states can legally search about job candidates and employees online, probing social networking sites for personal information that might bear on hiring and employment decisions. We examine GINA's protections for online sharing of genetic information as well as its limitations, and propose policy recommendations to address current gaps that leave employees' genetic information vulnerable in a Web-based world.

摘要

基因分型成本的降低和社交媒体的广泛应用,推动了个人基因检测行业的发展,消费者可以在网上购买和交流基因风险信息。《2008 年联邦遗传信息非歧视法案》(GINA)在一定程度上保护了消费者及其基因风险概况,该法案禁止雇主和健康保险公司歧视性地使用遗传信息;然而,鉴于在线社交网络的日常实践及其对工作场所的影响,该法案在执行方面存在实际和技术上的限制。在 Web 2.0 时代,大多数州的雇主都可以合法地在线搜索求职者和员工信息,在社交网站上探查可能影响雇佣和就业决策的个人信息。我们研究了 GINA 对在线共享基因信息的保护及其局限性,并提出了政策建议,以解决当前的差距问题,这些问题使得员工的基因信息在网络世界中变得脆弱。

相似文献

1
Protecting posted genes: social networking and the limits of GINA.保护发布的基因:社交网络与 GINA 的局限性。
Am J Bioeth. 2014;14(11):32-44. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.957417.
2
Sharing genetic information online: an exploration of GINA's 2.0 frontier.在线分享遗传信息:对《遗传信息非歧视法案》2.0前沿的探索。
Am J Bioeth. 2014;14(11):53-5. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.957620.
3
GINA's limits or something more? The need for greater protection of employee health-related information.《吉娜法案》的限制还是其他因素?加强对员工健康相关信息保护的必要性。
Am J Bioeth. 2014;14(11):45-8. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.957625.
4
Direct-to-consumer genomics companies should provide guidance to their customers on (not) sharing personal genomic information.直接面向消费者的基因检测公司应该就(是否)分享个人基因信息向其客户提供指导。
Am J Bioeth. 2014;14(11):55-7. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.959320.
5
Policy and the inevitability of sharing: GINA and social media.政策与信息共享的必然性:《基因信息非歧视法案》与社交媒体
Am J Bioeth. 2014;14(11):57-9. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.957422.
6
How political cultures affect governance efforts to protect "posted genes": insights from Germany.政治文化如何影响保护“植入基因”的治理努力:来自德国的见解
Am J Bioeth. 2014;14(11):50-3. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.957421.
7
The need to be aware and beware of the genetic information nondiscrimination act.需要了解并警惕《遗传信息非歧视法案》。
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2011 Jun;15(3):E34-41. doi: 10.1188/11.CJON.E34-E41.
8
Genetic discrimination, genetic privacy: rethinking employee protections for a brave new workplace.基因歧视、基因隐私:重新思考对全新工作场所中员工的保护措施。
Northwest Univ Law Rev. 2002 Summer;96(4):1497-551.
9
Beyond social media: inadvertent acquisition of genetic information in medical certifications.社交媒体之外:医疗认证中遗传信息的意外获取
Am J Bioeth. 2014;14(11):48-50. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.957624.
10
The social response to genetic conditions: beware of the antidiscrimination law.社会对基因疾病的反应:谨防反歧视法。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Sep-Oct;26(5):1249-52. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.5.1249.

引用本文的文献

1
Invited Expert Opinion- Bioinformatic and Limitation Directives to Help Adopt Genetic Addiction Risk Screening and Identify Preaddictive Reward Dysregulation: Required Analytic Evidence to Induce Dopamine Homeostatsis.特邀专家意见——生物信息学与局限性指令,以助力采用遗传成瘾风险筛查并识别预测性奖赏失调:诱导多巴胺稳态所需的分析证据
Med Res Arch. 2023 Sep 14;11(8). doi: 10.18103/mra.v11i8.4211.
2
Efficient Federated Kinship Relationship Identification.高效的联邦亲属关系识别
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2023 Jun 16;2023:534-543. eCollection 2023.
3
People with disability and privacy in precision medicine research: what's at stake?
残障人士与精准医学研究中的隐私:有何风险?
Trends Genet. 2023 May;39(5):335-337. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2023.01.001. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
4
Direct-to-consumer genetic testing in the news: a descriptive analysis.新闻中的直接面向消费者的基因检测:一项描述性分析。
J Community Genet. 2023 Feb;14(1):63-69. doi: 10.1007/s12687-022-00613-z. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
5
A content analysis of direct-to-consumer DNA testing on TikTok.TikTok上直接面向消费者的DNA检测的内容分析。
J Community Genet. 2021 Jul;12(3):489-492. doi: 10.1007/s12687-021-00526-3. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
6
Privacy challenges and research opportunities for genomic data sharing.基因组数据共享的隐私挑战和研究机会。
Nat Genet. 2020 Jul;52(7):646-654. doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-0651-0. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
7
Regulating Gamete Donation in the U.S.: Ethical, Legal and Social Implications.美国配子捐赠的监管:伦理、法律及社会影响
Laws. 2015 Sep;4(3):352-376. doi: 10.3390/laws4030352.
8
Confidentiality & the Risk of Genetic Discrimination: What Surgeons Need to Know.保密与基因歧视风险:外科医生需要了解的内容。
Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2015 Oct;24(4):667-81. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2015.06.004. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
9
Policy and the inevitability of sharing: GINA and social media.政策与信息共享的必然性:《基因信息非歧视法案》与社交媒体
Am J Bioeth. 2014;14(11):57-9. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.957422.