• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

TikTok上直接面向消费者的DNA检测的内容分析。

A content analysis of direct-to-consumer DNA testing on TikTok.

作者信息

Basch Corey H, Fera Joseph, Quinones Nasia

机构信息

Department of Public Health, William Paterson University, University Hall 366, Wayne, NJ, 07470, USA.

Department of Mathematics, Lehman College, City University of New York, 250 Bedford Park Blvd W, The Bronx, NY, 10468, USA.

出版信息

J Community Genet. 2021 Jul;12(3):489-492. doi: 10.1007/s12687-021-00526-3. Epub 2021 Apr 15.

DOI:10.1007/s12687-021-00526-3
PMID:33860464
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8241950/
Abstract

Despite the fact that the internet is a popular source of health information, limited research has been conducted on the ways in which direct-to-consumer (DTC) DNA testing has been discussed by consumers on the internet, and on social media platforms specifically. The purpose of this study was to describe the content of 100 videos that addressed DTC DNA testing on TikTok, a video-sharing social network. The 100 videos included had a combined 77,498 comments and 9,680,309 likes.The majority (> 50%) of videos reviewed mentioned using DTC DNA testing kits to find family roots (94%), included information on commercial DNA testing kits (67%), and featured a person taking or talking about taking a DNA test (92%). These videos also received a majority of the total comments/likes. Neither the use of music (p = .06 and p = .07) nor the mention of using DNA testing to locate family (p = .08 and p = .09) had a significant effect on a video's comments or likes, respectively. Genetic counselors, health care providers, and public health professionals should be aware that there is a need to present both benefits and disadvantages of DTC DNA testing on social media platforms. A greater presence of comprehensive information on social media platforms can increase the likelihood that one makes erudite decisions.

摘要

尽管互联网是健康信息的一个流行来源,但针对消费者在互联网上,特别是在社交媒体平台上讨论直接面向消费者(DTC)DNA检测的方式所开展的研究有限。本研究的目的是描述在视频分享社交网络TikTok上100个涉及DTC DNA检测的视频内容。所纳入的这100个视频共有77498条评论和9680309个赞。大多数(>50%)被审查的视频提到使用DTC DNA检测试剂盒寻找家族根源(94%),包含商业DNA检测试剂盒的信息(67%),并且有一个人进行或谈论进行DNA检测的内容(92%)。这些视频也获得了总评论数/点赞数的大部分。音乐的使用(p = 0.06和p = 0.07)以及提及使用DNA检测寻找家族成员(p = 0.08和p = 0.09)分别对视频的评论或点赞均无显著影响。遗传咨询师、医疗保健提供者和公共卫生专业人员应意识到有必要在社交媒体平台上呈现DTC DNA检测的利弊。社交媒体平台上更全面的信息呈现可以增加人们做出明智决策的可能性。

相似文献

1
A content analysis of direct-to-consumer DNA testing on TikTok.TikTok上直接面向消费者的DNA检测的内容分析。
J Community Genet. 2021 Jul;12(3):489-492. doi: 10.1007/s12687-021-00526-3. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
2
#Climate Change on TikTok: A Content Analysis of Videos.#TikTok 上的气候变化:视频内容分析。
J Community Health. 2022 Feb;47(1):163-167. doi: 10.1007/s10900-021-01031-x. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
3
Factors Driving Citizen Engagement With Government TikTok Accounts During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Model Development and Analysis.新冠疫情期间推动公民与政府 TikTok 账户互动的因素:模型开发与分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 4;23(2):e21463. doi: 10.2196/21463.
4
Community Mitigation of COVID-19 and Portrayal of Testing on TikTok: Descriptive Study.TikTok上新冠疫情的社区缓解措施及检测情况描述性研究
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Jun 10;7(6):e29528. doi: 10.2196/29528.
5
Investigating #covidnurse Messages on TikTok: Descriptive Study.调查TikTok上的#covidnurse信息:描述性研究。
JMIR Nurs. 2022 Jan 14;5(1):e35274. doi: 10.2196/35274.
6
Deconstructing TikTok Videos on Mental Health: Cross-sectional, Descriptive Content Analysis.剖析TikTok上关于心理健康的视频:横断面描述性内容分析
JMIR Form Res. 2022 May 19;6(5):e38340. doi: 10.2196/38340.
7
Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing on Social Media: Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis of YouTube Users' Comments.社交媒体上的直接面向消费者的基因检测:YouTube用户评论的主题建模与情感分析
JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Sep 15;2(2):e38749. doi: 10.2196/38749. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.
8
TikTok: An Opportunity for Antibiotic Education?抖音:抗生素教育的契机?
Innov Pharm. 2022 Dec 26;13(4). doi: 10.24926/iip.v13i4.4916. eCollection 2022.
9
Communicating COVID-19 information on TikTok: a content analysis of TikTok videos from official accounts featured in the COVID-19 information hub.在 TikTok 上传播 COVID-19 信息:对 COVID-19 信息中心特色官方账户 TikTok 视频的内容分析。
Health Educ Res. 2021 Jul 12;36(3):261-271. doi: 10.1093/her/cyab010.
10
TikTok as an Information Hodgepodge: Evaluation of the Quality and Reliability of Genitourinary Cancers Related Content.作为信息大杂烩的TikTok:泌尿生殖系统癌症相关内容的质量与可靠性评估
Front Oncol. 2022 Feb 15;12:789956. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.789956. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Policy Guidance for Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Services: Framework Development Study.面向消费者的基因检测服务政策指南:框架开发研究
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 17;26:e47389. doi: 10.2196/47389.
2
Wikipedia as an academic service-learning tool in science and technology: higher education case from Siberia.维基百科作为科技领域的学术服务学习工具:来自西伯利亚的高等教育案例
J Community Genet. 2024 Apr;15(2):147-161. doi: 10.1007/s12687-023-00692-6. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
3
Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing on Social Media: Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis of YouTube Users' Comments.社交媒体上的直接面向消费者的基因检测:YouTube用户评论的主题建模与情感分析
JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Sep 15;2(2):e38749. doi: 10.2196/38749. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.
4
Direct-to-consumer genetic testing in the news: a descriptive analysis.新闻中的直接面向消费者的基因检测:一项描述性分析。
J Community Genet. 2023 Feb;14(1):63-69. doi: 10.1007/s12687-022-00613-z. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
5
Using TikTok for public and youth mental health - A systematic review and content analysis.利用 TikTok 促进公众和青少年的精神健康:一项系统评价和内容分析。
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2023 Jan;28(1):279-306. doi: 10.1177/13591045221106608. Epub 2022 Jun 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Promoting Mask Use on TikTok: Descriptive, Cross-sectional Study.在 TikTok 上推广口罩使用:描述性、横断面研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Feb 12;7(2):e26392. doi: 10.2196/26392.
2
DNA testing information on YouTube: Inadequate advice can mislead and harm the public.YouTube 上的 DNA 检测信息:不充分的建议可能会误导和伤害公众。
J Genet Couns. 2021 Jun;30(3):785-792. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1375. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
3
Direct-to-consumer genetic testing.直接面向消费者的基因检测。
BMJ. 2019 Oct 16;367:l5688. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5688.
4
Using genetic genealogy databases in missing persons cases and to develop suspect leads in violent crimes.在失踪人员案件中使用遗传系谱数据库,并在暴力犯罪中寻找嫌疑人线索。
Forensic Sci Int. 2019 Aug;301:107-117. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.05.016. Epub 2019 May 14.
5
GINA at 10 years: the battle over 'genetic information' continues in court.《哮喘防治全球创议》发布10年之际:关于“基因信息”的争论仍在法庭上继续。
J Law Biosci. 2019 May 25;5(3):495-526. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsz002. eCollection 2018 Dec.
6
Genealogy databases and the future of criminal investigation.家谱数据库与刑事调查的未来。
Science. 2018 Jun 8;360(6393):1078-1079. doi: 10.1126/science.aau1083.
7
Protecting posted genes: social networking and the limits of GINA.保护发布的基因:社交网络与 GINA 的局限性。
Am J Bioeth. 2014;14(11):32-44. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2014.957417.
8
Direct-to-consumer genomics, social networking, and confidentiality.直接面向消费者的基因组学、社交网络与保密性。
Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):45-6. doi: 10.1080/15265160902893924.
9
Currents in contemporary ethics. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: is it the practice of medicine?当代伦理学中的思潮。直接面向消费者的基因检测:这是医疗行为吗?
J Law Med Ethics. 2009 Summer;37(2):369-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2009.00380.x.
10
DNA-testing for immigration cases: the risk of erroneous conclusions.移民案件中的DNA检测:得出错误结论的风险。
Forensic Sci Int. 2007 Oct 25;172(2-3):144-9. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.12.015. Epub 2007 Feb 20.