Suppr超能文献

影响脑血管反应性测定的因素。

Factors affecting the determination of cerebrovascular reactivity.

作者信息

Regan Rosemary E, Fisher Joseph A, Duffin James

机构信息

Department of Physiology, University of Toronto Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada.

Department of Physiology, University of Toronto Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada ; Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Toronto Toronto, ON, Canada ; University Health Network Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Brain Behav. 2014 Sep;4(5):775-88. doi: 10.1002/brb3.275. Epub 2014 Aug 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR), measures the ability of the cerebrovasculature to respond to vasoactive stimuli such as CO2. CVR is often expressed as the ratio of cerebral blood flow change to CO2 change. We examine several factors affecting this measurement: blood pressure, stimulus pattern, response analysis and subject position.

METHODS

Step and ramp increases in CO2 were implemented in nine subjects, seated and supine. Middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity (MCAv), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were determined breath-by-breath. Cerebrovascular conductance (MCAc) was estimated as MCAv/MAP. CVR was calculated from both the relative and absolute measures of MCAc and MCAv responses.

RESULTS

MAP increased with CO2 in some subjects so that relative CVR calculated from conductance responses were less than those calculated from CVR calculated from velocity responses. CVR measured from step responses were affected by the response dynamics, and were less than those calculated from CVR measured from ramp responses. Subject position did not affect CVR.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) MAP increases with CO2 and acts as a confounding factor for CVR measurement; (2) CVR depends on the stimulus pattern used; (3) CVR did not differ from the sitting versus supine in these experiments; (4) CVR calculated from absolute changes of MCAv was less than that calculated from relative changes.

摘要

背景与目的

脑血管反应性(CVR)用于衡量脑血管系统对诸如二氧化碳等血管活性刺激的反应能力。CVR通常表示为脑血流量变化与二氧化碳变化的比值。我们研究了影响该测量值的几个因素:血压、刺激模式、反应分析和受试者体位。

方法

对9名受试者分别在坐位和仰卧位时实施二氧化碳的阶梯式和斜坡式增加。逐次呼吸测定大脑中动脉血流速度(MCAv)和平均动脉压(MAP)。脑血管传导率(MCAc)通过MCAv/MAP估算。CVR根据MCAc和MCAv反应的相对和绝对测量值计算得出。

结果

部分受试者的MAP随二氧化碳增加,因此根据传导反应计算的相对CVR低于根据速度反应计算的CVR。从阶梯反应测得的CVR受反应动力学影响,低于从斜坡反应测得的CVR。受试者体位不影响CVR。

结论

(1)MAP随二氧化碳增加,是CVR测量的混杂因素;(2)CVR取决于所使用的刺激模式;(3)在这些实验中,坐位与仰卧位的CVR无差异;(4)根据MCAv的绝对变化计算的CVR低于根据相对变化计算的CVR。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21ac/4188369/bd2679aff620/brb30004-0775-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验